https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2307485
Bug ID: 2307485
Summary: perl-PDL-2.090 is available
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Status: NEW
Component: perl-PDL
Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged
Assignee: jplesnik(a)redhat.com
Reporter: upstream-release-monitoring(a)fedoraproject.org
QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org
CC: jplesnik(a)redhat.com, kasal(a)ucw.cz, lkundrak(a)v3.sk,
perl-devel(a)lists.fedoraproject.org,
rhughes(a)redhat.com, rstrode(a)redhat.com
Target Milestone: ---
Classification: Fedora
Releases retrieved: 2.090
Upstream release that is considered latest: 2.090
Current version/release in rawhide: 2.89.0-3.fc41
URL: https://metacpan.org/dist/PDL/
Please consult the package updates policy before you issue an update to a
stable branch: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/fesco/Updates_Policy/
More information about the service that created this bug can be found at:
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/package-maintainers/Upstream_Release_M…
Please keep in mind that with any upstream change, there may also be packaging
changes that need to be made. Specifically, please remember that it is your
responsibility to review the new version to ensure that the licensing is still
correct and that no non-free or legally problematic items have been added
upstream.
Based on the information from Anitya:
https://release-monitoring.org/project/3205/
To change the monitoring settings for the project, please visit:
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/perl-PDL
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2307485
Report this comment as SPAM: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla&format=report-sp…
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2308171
Bug ID: 2308171
Summary: Please branch and build perl-UNIVERSAL-isa for EPEL 10
Product: Fedora EPEL
Version: epel10
Status: NEW
Component: perl-UNIVERSAL-isa
Assignee: spotrh(a)gmail.com
Reporter: paul(a)city-fan.org
QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org
CC: iarnell(a)gmail.com, perl-devel(a)lists.fedoraproject.org,
spotrh(a)gmail.com
Target Milestone: ---
Classification: Fedora
Could you please branch and build perl-UNIVERSAL-isa for EPEL 10 ?
If you like you could add me (FAS: pghmcfc) as a committer to the package and
I'll do it myself.
This is for Perl::Critic; I'm also going to need perl-Lingua-EN-Inflect and
perl-Test-Object.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2308171
Report this comment as SPAM: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla&format=report-sp…
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2184301
Bug ID: 2184301
Summary: perl-Syntax-Feature-Loop-1.8.0-18.fc39 FTBFS:
t/01_basic.t and 3more test fail
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
URL: https://koschei.fedoraproject.org/package/perl-Syntax-
Feature-Loop
Status: NEW
Component: perl-Syntax-Feature-Loop
Assignee: jplesnik(a)redhat.com
Reporter: jplesnik(a)redhat.com
QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org
CC: jplesnik(a)redhat.com,
perl-devel(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
Target Milestone: ---
Link ID: CPAN 147485
Classification: Fedora
Description of problem:
Package perl-Syntax-Feature-Loop fails to build from source in Fedora Rawhide.
Bareword found where operator expected at t/01_basic.t line 20, near "loop"
(Missing semicolon on previous line?)
syntax error at t/01_basic.t line 19, near "; last "
Global symbol "$s" requires explicit package name (did you forget to declare
"my $s"?) at t/01_basic.t line 20.
Global symbol "$i" requires explicit package name (did you forget to declare
"my $i"?) at t/01_basic.t line 20.
Global symbol "$s" requires explicit package name (did you forget to declare
"my $s"?) at t/01_basic.t line 20.
Global symbol "$s" requires explicit package name (did you forget to declare
"my $s"?) at t/01_basic.t line 21.
syntax error at t/01_basic.t line 22, near "}"
Can't redeclare "my" in "my" at t/01_basic.t line 26, near "my"
syntax error at t/01_basic.t line 28, near "last if"
syntax error at t/01_basic.t line 36, near "}"
syntax error at t/01_basic.t line 38, near "}"
t/01_basic.t has too many errors.
# Looks like your test exited with 2 before it could output anything.
t/01_basic.t ............
Dubious, test returned 2 (wstat 512, 0x200)
Failed 4/4 subtests
Bareword found where operator expected at t/02_pragma_a.t line 28, near "is"
(Missing semicolon on previous line?)
syntax error at t/02_pragma_a.t line 27, near "; last"
BEGIN not safe after errors--compilation aborted at t/02_pragma_a.t line 31.
# Looks like your test exited with 2 before it could output anything.
t/02_pragma_a.t .........
Dubious, test returned 2 (wstat 512, 0x200)
Failed 6/6 subtests
Bareword found where operator expected at t/02_pragma_b.t line 28, near "is"
(Missing semicolon on previous line?)
syntax error at t/02_pragma_b.t line 27, near "; last"
BEGIN not safe after errors--compilation aborted at t/02_pragma_b.t line 31.
# Looks like your test exited with 2 before it could output anything.
t/02_pragma_b.t .........
Dubious, test returned 2 (wstat 512, 0x200)
Failed 6/6 subtests
Semicolon seems to be missing at t/03_line_numbers.t line 112.
syntax error at t/03_line_numbers.t line 102, near "is"
syntax error at t/03_line_numbers.t line 112, near "}"
Execution of t/03_line_numbers.t aborted due to compilation errors.
# Looks like your test exited with 255 before it could output anything.
t/03_line_numbers.t .....
Dubious, test returned 255 (wstat 65280, 0xff00)
Failed 5/5 subtests
A difference between passing and failing build root is at
https://koschei.fedoraproject.org/build/15176950. An update of perl-Lexical-Var
from 0.009-31.fc38 to 0.010-1.fc39 is suspicious.
Additional info:
This package is tracked by Koschei. See:
https://koschei.fedoraproject.org/package/perl-Syntax-Feature-Loop
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2184301