perl-devel July 2023

perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

4 participants
214 discussions

[Bug 2175807] New: perl-Git-Repository-1.325-7.fc39 FTBFS: t/20-simple.t fails EDITOR tests
by bugzilla＠redhat.com 09 Mar '24

09 Mar '24

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2175807 Bug ID: 2175807 Summary: perl-Git-Repository-1.325-7.fc39 FTBFS: t/20-simple.t fails EDITOR tests Product: Fedora Version: rawhide URL: https://koschei.fedoraproject.org/package/perl-Git-Rep ository?collection=f39 Status: NEW Component: perl-Git-Repository Assignee: jpazdziora(a)redhat.com Reporter: ppisar(a)redhat.com QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: iarnell(a)gmail.com, jpazdziora(a)redhat.com, perl-devel(a)lists.fedoraproject.org Blocks: 2168842 (F39FTBFS,RAWHIDEFTBFS) Target Milestone: --- Classification: Fedora perl-Git-Repository-1.325-7.fc39 fails to build in Fedora 39 because t/20-simple.t test fails: t/20-simple.t .............. 1/54 # Failed test 'git var GIT_EDITOR' # at t/20-simple.t line 88. # # Failed test 'Git complains about lack of smarts and editor' # at t/20-simple.t line 89. # # '' # doesn't match '(?^:^fatal: Terminal is dumb, but EDITOR unset )' # # Looks like you failed 2 tests of 54. t/20-simple.t .............. Dubious, test returned 2 (wstat 512, 0x200) Failed 2/54 subtests t/21-submodule.t ........... Cloning into '/tmp/TiMR_SSxRH/sub'... done. at t/21-submodule.t line 46. A difference between passing and failing build root is at <https://koschei.fedoraproject.org/build/15041670>. This is probably triggered by upgrading git from 2.39.2-1.fc39 to 2.40.0-0.1.rc1.fc39. Referenced Bugs: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2168842 [Bug 2168842] Fedora 39 FTBFS Tracker -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2175807

1 4

[Bug 2223392] New: perl-Test-Vars: FTBFS in Fedora Rawhide
by bugzilla＠redhat.com 05 Mar '24

05 Mar '24

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2223392 Bug ID: 2223392 Summary: perl-Test-Vars: FTBFS in Fedora Rawhide Product: Fedora Version: rawhide URL: https://koschei.fedoraproject.org/package/perl-Test-Va rs OS: Linux Status: NEW Component: perl-Test-Vars Severity: medium Assignee: paul(a)city-fan.org Reporter: jplesnik(a)redhat.com QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: paul(a)city-fan.org, perl-devel(a)lists.fedoraproject.org Target Milestone: --- Classification: Fedora Description of problem: Package perl-Test-Vars fails to build from source in Fedora Rawhide with new Perl 5.38. + ./Build test # Testing Test::Vars/0.015 t/00_load.t .............. ok t/01_all_vars_ok_self.t .. ok # Test::Vars ignores CompileError.pm because: Intentional compile error. # Test::Vars ignores ImplicitTopic.pm because: Can't use global $_ in "my" at t/lib/ImplicitTopic.pm line 6, near "my $_ " t/02_no_warnings.t ....... ok t/03_warned.t ............ ok t/04_ignores.t ........... ok t/05_test_vars.t ......... ok t/06_vars_ok_self.t ...... ok # Failed test 'got expected output from test_vars' # at t/07_stub_sub_bug.t line 25. # Structures begin differing at: # $got->[0][2][1][1] = '$x is used once in &StubSub::foo ' # $expected->[0][2][1][1] = '$x is used once in &StubSub::foo at t/lib/StubSub.pm line 13' # Looks like you failed 1 test of 2. t/07_stub_sub_bug.t ...... Dubious, test returned 1 (wstat 256, 0x100) Failed 1/2 subtests t/08_undef_aux_list.t .... ok t/09_array_slice.t ....... ok t/10_my_sub.t ............ ok Test Summary Report ------------------- t/07_stub_sub_bug.t (Wstat: 256 (exited 1) Tests: 2 Failed: 1) Failed test: 2 Non-zero exit status: 1 Files=11, Tests=71, 1 wallclock secs ( 0.04 usr 0.01 sys + 1.14 cusr 0.31 csys = 1.50 CPU) Result: FAIL Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): 0.015-9.fc39 Steps to Reproduce: koji build --scratch f39 perl-Test-Vars-0.015-9.fc39.src.rpm Additional info: This package is tracked by Koschei. See: https://koschei.fedoraproject.org/package/perl-Test-Vars Reproducible: Always -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2223392 Report this comment as SPAM: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla&format=report-sp…

1 11

[Bug 2222638] New: F39FailsToInstall: perl-Tk
by bugzilla＠redhat.com 05 Mar '24

05 Mar '24

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2222638 Bug ID: 2222638 Summary: F39FailsToInstall: perl-Tk Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Status: NEW Component: perl-Tk Assignee: xavier(a)bachelot.org Reporter: fti-bugs(a)fedoraproject.org QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: andreas.bierfert(a)lowlatency.de, perl-devel(a)lists.fedoraproject.org, xavier(a)bachelot.org Blocks: 2168845 (F39FailsToInstall,RAWHIDEFailsToInstall) Target Milestone: --- Classification: Fedora Hello, Please note that this comment was generated automatically by https://pagure.io/releng/blob/main/f/scripts/ftbfs-fti/follow-policy.py If you feel that this output has mistakes, please open an issue at https://pagure.io/releng/ Your package (perl-Tk) Fails To Install in Fedora 39: can't install perl-Tk: - nothing provides libperl.so.5.36()(64bit) needed by perl-Tk-804.036-9.fc39.x86_64 - nothing provides perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.36.0) needed by perl-Tk-804.036-9.fc39.x86_64 If you know about this problem and are planning on fixing it, please acknowledge so by setting the bug status to ASSIGNED. If you don't have time to maintain this package, consider orphaning it, so maintainers of dependent packages realize the problem. If you don't react accordingly to the policy for FTBFS/FTI bugs (https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/fesco/Fails_to_build_from_source_Fails…) your package may be orphaned in 8+ weeks. P.S. The data was generated solely from koji buildroot, so it might be newer than the latest compose or the content on mirrors. To reproduce, use the koji/local repo only, e.g. in mock: $ mock -r fedora-39-x86_64 --config-opts mirrored=False install perl-Tk P.P.S. If this bug has been reported in the middle of upgrading multiple dependent packages, please consider using side tags: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/fesco/Updates_Policy/#updating-inter-d… Thanks! Referenced Bugs: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2168845 [Bug 2168845] Fedora 39 Fails To install Tracker -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2222638 Report this comment as SPAM: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla&format=report-sp…

1 13

[Bug 2181971] New: perl-Glib-Object-Introspection-0.050 is available
by bugzilla＠redhat.com 18 Feb '24

18 Feb '24

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2181971 Bug ID: 2181971 Summary: perl-Glib-Object-Introspection-0.050 is available Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Status: NEW Component: perl-Glib-Object-Introspection Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged Assignee: berrange(a)redhat.com Reporter: upstream-release-monitoring(a)fedoraproject.org QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: berrange(a)redhat.com, perl-devel(a)lists.fedoraproject.org, sergio(a)serjux.com Target Milestone: --- Classification: Fedora Releases retrieved: 0.050 Upstream release that is considered latest: 0.050 Current version/release in rawhide: 0.049-11.fc38 URL: http://search.cpan.org/dist/Glib-Object-Introspection/ Please consult the package updates policy before you issue an update to a stable branch: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/fesco/Updates_Policy/ More information about the service that created this bug can be found at: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/package-maintainers/Upstream_Release_M… Please keep in mind that with any upstream change, there may also be packaging changes that need to be made. Specifically, please remember that it is your responsibility to review the new version to ensure that the licensing is still correct and that no non-free or legally problematic items have been added upstream. Based on the information from Anitya: https://release-monitoring.org/project/2924/ To change the monitoring settings for the project, please visit: https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/perl-Glib-Object-Introspection -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2181971

1 31

[Bug 1936241] New: Compiled @INC in 5.32 No longer Includes Suitable Path For Custom System-Wide Modules
by bugzilla＠redhat.com 31 Jan '24

31 Jan '24

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1936241 Bug ID: 1936241 Summary: Compiled @INC in 5.32 No longer Includes Suitable Path For Custom System-Wide Modules Product: Fedora Version: 33 Hardware: All OS: Linux Status: NEW Component: perl Severity: medium Assignee: jplesnik(a)redhat.com Reporter: claywj(a)gmail.com QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: caillon+fedoraproject(a)gmail.com, iarnell(a)gmail.com, jplesnik(a)redhat.com, kasal(a)ucw.cz, mmaslano(a)redhat.com, perl-devel(a)lists.fedoraproject.org, ppisar(a)redhat.com, psabata(a)redhat.com, rhughes(a)redhat.com, sandmann(a)redhat.com, spotrh(a)gmail.com Target Milestone: --- Classification: Fedora Description of problem: Removing /usr/local/share/perl5 for the version specific dir with 5.32 from the compiled @INC makes it difficult to maintain custom system wide modules apart from the standard rpm/CPAN locations when upgrading. As this is done during build, is it possible to get it added back in the next version? Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): 5.32 How reproducible: perl -e 'print "@INC\n"' Steps to Reproduce: 1. Using CVS/SCM software to update a custom module, it goes to the expected old location no longer part of @INC and the changes are not seen. Actual results: See above Expected results: The path would remain and the changes seen Additional info: Yes, CVS/SCM can be changed but in this case the update came across on "Thu 25 Feb 2021 04:46:53 PM CST" during updates. The installer did relocate the existing custom modules to ./5.32 but the change was not noticed until an update to one of the custom modules took place -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 3

[Bug 1731721] New: perl-Font-AFM depends on files/directories from non-standard locations
by bugzilla＠redhat.com 29 Jan '24

29 Jan '24

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1731721 Bug ID: 1731721 Summary: perl-Font-AFM depends on files/directories from non-standard locations Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Status: NEW Component: perl-Font-AFM Assignee: rc040203(a)freenet.de Reporter: i.gnatenko.brain(a)gmail.com QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: lxtnow(a)gmail.com, perl-devel(a)lists.fedoraproject.org, rc040203(a)freenet.de, rob.myers(a)gtri.gatech.edu, tcallawa(a)redhat.com, tremble(a)tremble.org.uk Blocks: 1731683 Target Milestone: --- Classification: Fedora Hello, Fedora Packaging Guidelines allow dependencies only on files/directories from /usr/bin, /usr/sbin and /etc directories[0]. Your package depends on files/directories outside of those. See below for more information about package/dependencies. --- perl-Font-AFM-1.20-30.fc31.src: - /usr/share/a2ps/afm/phvr.afm --- Please correct those or provide reason why is it correct. It is very important to not download huge filelists.xml just because few packages in distribution depend on non-standard paths. Thanks for cooperation! [0] https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/packaging-guidelines/#_file_and_direct… Referenced Bugs: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1731683 [Bug 1731683] Packages which are not following Packaging Guidelines -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 7

[Bug 1731700] New: rt depends on files/directories from non-standard locations
by bugzilla＠redhat.com 29 Jan '24

29 Jan '24

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1731700 Bug ID: 1731700 Summary: rt depends on files/directories from non-standard locations Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Status: NEW Component: rt Assignee: rc040203(a)freenet.de Reporter: i.gnatenko.brain(a)gmail.com QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: perl-devel(a)lists.fedoraproject.org, rc040203(a)freenet.de, tibbs(a)math.uh.edu Blocks: 1731683 Target Milestone: --- Classification: Fedora Hello, Fedora Packaging Guidelines allow dependencies only on files/directories from /usr/bin, /usr/sbin and /etc directories[0]. Your package depends on files/directories outside of those. See below for more information about package/dependencies. --- rt-4.4.4-2.fc31.noarch: - /usr/share/fonts/google-droid/DroidSansFallback.ttf - /usr/share/fonts/google-droid/DroidSans.ttf rt-4.4.4-2.fc31.src: - /usr/share/fonts/google-droid/DroidSansFallback.ttf - /usr/share/fonts/google-droid/DroidSans.ttf --- Please correct those or provide reason why is it correct. It is very important to not download huge filelists.xml just because few packages in distribution depend on non-standard paths. Thanks for cooperation! [0] https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/packaging-guidelines/#_file_and_direct… Referenced Bugs: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1731683 [Bug 1731683] Packages which are not following Packaging Guidelines -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 14

[Bug 1731718] New: perl-Convert-Color depends on files/directories from non-standard locations
by bugzilla＠redhat.com 27 Jan '24

27 Jan '24

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1731718 Bug ID: 1731718 Summary: perl-Convert-Color depends on files/directories from non-standard locations Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Status: NEW Component: perl-Convert-Color Assignee: rc040203(a)freenet.de Reporter: i.gnatenko.brain(a)gmail.com QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: perl-devel(a)lists.fedoraproject.org, rc040203(a)freenet.de Blocks: 1731683 Target Milestone: --- Classification: Fedora Hello, Fedora Packaging Guidelines allow dependencies only on files/directories from /usr/bin, /usr/sbin and /etc directories[0]. Your package depends on files/directories outside of those. See below for more information about package/dependencies. --- perl-Convert-Color-0.11-16.fc31.src: - /usr/share/X11/rgb.txt --- Please correct those or provide reason why is it correct. It is very important to not download huge filelists.xml just because few packages in distribution depend on non-standard paths. Thanks for cooperation! [0] https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/packaging-guidelines/#_file_and_direct… Referenced Bugs: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1731683 [Bug 1731683] Packages which are not following Packaging Guidelines -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 10

[Bug 2184280] New: Please upgrade perl-Lexical-Var to >= 0.010
by bugzilla＠redhat.com 26 Jan '24

26 Jan '24

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2184280 Bug ID: 2184280 Summary: Please upgrade perl-Lexical-Var to >= 0.010 Product: Fedora Version: 38 Status: NEW Component: perl-Lexical-Var Assignee: jplesnik(a)redhat.com Reporter: rc040203(a)freenet.de QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: jplesnik(a)redhat.com, paul(a)city-fan.org, perl-devel(a)lists.fedoraproject.org Target Milestone: --- Classification: Fedora Description of problem: Please upgrade perl-Lexical-Var to >= 0.010 on all Fedora releases < 39. perl-Lexical-Var >= 0.10 is required by perl-Sub-Exporter-Lexical-1.000 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2184280

1 3

[rpms/perl-Sys-Virt-TCK] PR #1: SELinux policy for Libvirt-TCK
by Nikola Knazekova 25 Jan '24

25 Jan '24

nknazeko opened a new pull-request against the project: `perl-Sys-Virt-TCK` that you are following: `` SELinux policy for Libvirt-TCK `` To reply, visit the link below https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/perl-Sys-Virt-TCK/pull-request/1

2 4

Jump to page:

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

2005

perl-devel July 2023