https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2053941
Bug ID: 2053941
Summary: The Fedora BuildRequires is missing an the license
files are listed as %doc
Product: Fedora
Version: 34
Status: NEW
Component: cpanspec
Assignee: psabata(a)redhat.com
Reporter: bugzilla(a)terrortux.de
QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org
CC: ktdreyer(a)ktdreyer.com,
perl-devel(a)lists.fedoraproject.org,
psabata(a)redhat.com, steve(a)silug.org,
strobert(a)strobe.net
Target Milestone: ---
Classification: Fedora
Description of problem:
In the generated spec file, this line is missing:
# needes by all perl packages
BuildRequires: perl-generators perl-interpreter perl-devel perl
And the license files of the generated spec file are marked as %doc instant of
%license
Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
cpanspec-1.78-39.fc34.noarch
How reproducible:
Every time
Steps to Reproduce:
1. Call cpanspec Sort::Versions for example
Actual results:
See above
Expected results:
Correct spec file
Additional info:
Also the old %setup macro is used.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2053941
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2218170
Bug ID: 2218170
Summary: Please consider removing/porting aspell dependency.
Aspell has been deprecated
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Status: NEW
Component: perl-Text-Aspell
Assignee: spotrh(a)gmail.com
Reporter: ljavorsk(a)redhat.com
QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org
CC: perl-devel(a)lists.fedoraproject.org, spotrh(a)gmail.com
Blocks: 2210277
Target Milestone: ---
Classification: Fedora
Aspell has been deprecated since Fedora 39.
Please consider removing dependency on aspell, or porting it to the variants
like hunspell or enchant/enchant2.
Change proposal is located here:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/AspellDeprecation
FESCo approval is located here: https://pagure.io/fesco/issue/3009
If your component has already removed/ported it's aspell dependency, or you
don't Require/BuildRequire any aspell subpackage, feel free to close this
Bugzilla.
This Bugzilla was created automatically and some issues might have occurred
along the way.
Referenced Bugs:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2210277
[Bug 2210277] Deprecation of aspell package
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2218170
Report this comment as SPAM: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla&format=report-sp…
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2184301
Bug ID: 2184301
Summary: perl-Syntax-Feature-Loop-1.8.0-18.fc39 FTBFS:
t/01_basic.t and 3more test fail
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
URL: https://koschei.fedoraproject.org/package/perl-Syntax-
Feature-Loop
Status: NEW
Component: perl-Syntax-Feature-Loop
Assignee: jplesnik(a)redhat.com
Reporter: jplesnik(a)redhat.com
QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org
CC: jplesnik(a)redhat.com,
perl-devel(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
Target Milestone: ---
Link ID: CPAN 147485
Classification: Fedora
Description of problem:
Package perl-Syntax-Feature-Loop fails to build from source in Fedora Rawhide.
Bareword found where operator expected at t/01_basic.t line 20, near "loop"
(Missing semicolon on previous line?)
syntax error at t/01_basic.t line 19, near "; last "
Global symbol "$s" requires explicit package name (did you forget to declare
"my $s"?) at t/01_basic.t line 20.
Global symbol "$i" requires explicit package name (did you forget to declare
"my $i"?) at t/01_basic.t line 20.
Global symbol "$s" requires explicit package name (did you forget to declare
"my $s"?) at t/01_basic.t line 20.
Global symbol "$s" requires explicit package name (did you forget to declare
"my $s"?) at t/01_basic.t line 21.
syntax error at t/01_basic.t line 22, near "}"
Can't redeclare "my" in "my" at t/01_basic.t line 26, near "my"
syntax error at t/01_basic.t line 28, near "last if"
syntax error at t/01_basic.t line 36, near "}"
syntax error at t/01_basic.t line 38, near "}"
t/01_basic.t has too many errors.
# Looks like your test exited with 2 before it could output anything.
t/01_basic.t ............
Dubious, test returned 2 (wstat 512, 0x200)
Failed 4/4 subtests
Bareword found where operator expected at t/02_pragma_a.t line 28, near "is"
(Missing semicolon on previous line?)
syntax error at t/02_pragma_a.t line 27, near "; last"
BEGIN not safe after errors--compilation aborted at t/02_pragma_a.t line 31.
# Looks like your test exited with 2 before it could output anything.
t/02_pragma_a.t .........
Dubious, test returned 2 (wstat 512, 0x200)
Failed 6/6 subtests
Bareword found where operator expected at t/02_pragma_b.t line 28, near "is"
(Missing semicolon on previous line?)
syntax error at t/02_pragma_b.t line 27, near "; last"
BEGIN not safe after errors--compilation aborted at t/02_pragma_b.t line 31.
# Looks like your test exited with 2 before it could output anything.
t/02_pragma_b.t .........
Dubious, test returned 2 (wstat 512, 0x200)
Failed 6/6 subtests
Semicolon seems to be missing at t/03_line_numbers.t line 112.
syntax error at t/03_line_numbers.t line 102, near "is"
syntax error at t/03_line_numbers.t line 112, near "}"
Execution of t/03_line_numbers.t aborted due to compilation errors.
# Looks like your test exited with 255 before it could output anything.
t/03_line_numbers.t .....
Dubious, test returned 255 (wstat 65280, 0xff00)
Failed 5/5 subtests
A difference between passing and failing build root is at
https://koschei.fedoraproject.org/build/15176950. An update of perl-Lexical-Var
from 0.009-31.fc38 to 0.010-1.fc39 is suspicious.
Additional info:
This package is tracked by Koschei. See:
https://koschei.fedoraproject.org/package/perl-Syntax-Feature-Loop
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2184301
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1803973
Bug ID: 1803973
Summary: CGI::Session is missing in epel8
Product: Fedora EPEL
Version: epel8
Status: NEW
Component: perl-CGI-Session
Assignee: andreas(a)bawue.net
Reporter: netwiz(a)crc.id.au
QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org
CC: andreas(a)bawue.net, perl-devel(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
Target Milestone: ---
Classification: Fedora
The perl-CGI-Session package is not available for EPEL8.
Please import & build for EPEL8.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2028353
Bug ID: 2028353
Summary: Request to update perl-CDB_File to 1.03 (or newer)
Product: Fedora EPEL
Version: epel8
Hardware: All
OS: Linux
Status: NEW
Component: perl-CDB_File
Severity: high
Assignee: mmckinst(a)umich.edu
Reporter: fhirtz(a)redhat.com
QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org
CC: mmckinst(a)umich.edu, perl-devel(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
Target Milestone: ---
Classification: Fedora
Description of problem:
Good morning,
I'm working with someone who's running into a significant issue with an
automation system that they use (quattor.org) due to a bug in the version of
perl-CDB_File that's currently available in EPEL.
The bug in question is:
https://github.com/toddr/CDB_File/commit/9147df2c426b6ef8530fbc501e030168e1…
This was addressed in version 1.03 and we were seeing if it might be possible
to either include the patch as a backport, or more likely rebase to 1.03 (or
newer)?
Thank you!
Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
perl-CDB_File-1.02
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2028353
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2037860
Bug ID: 2037860
Summary: Please branch and build perl-HTML-Element-Extended for
EPEL 9
Product: Fedora EPEL
Version: epel9
Status: NEW
Component: perl-HTML-Element-Extended
Assignee: notting(a)splat.cc
Reporter: paul(a)city-fan.org
QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org
CC: emmanuel(a)seyman.fr, notting(a)splat.cc,
perl-devel(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
Target Milestone: ---
Classification: Fedora
Could you please branch and build perl-HTML-Element-Extended for EPEL 9 ?
If you like you could add me (FAS: pghmcfc) as a committer to the package and
I'll do it myself.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2037860
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1835353
Bug ID: 1835353
Summary: rubygem-mail: Out of memory issue through nested MIME
parts
Product: Security Response
Hardware: All
OS: Linux
Status: NEW
Component: vulnerability
Keywords: Security
Severity: medium
Priority: medium
Assignee: security-response-team(a)redhat.com
Reporter: psampaio(a)redhat.com
CC: akarol(a)redhat.com, alexl(a)redhat.com,
bbuckingham(a)redhat.com, bcourt(a)redhat.com,
bkearney(a)redhat.com, btotty(a)redhat.com,
caillon+fedoraproject(a)gmail.com, caolanm(a)redhat.com,
dmetzger(a)redhat.com, gmccullo(a)redhat.com,
gnome-sig(a)lists.fedoraproject.org,
gtanzill(a)redhat.com, hhudgeon(a)redhat.com,
jfrey(a)redhat.com, jhardy(a)redhat.com,
john.j5live(a)gmail.com, jose.p.oliveira.oss(a)gmail.com,
lzap(a)redhat.com, mclasen(a)redhat.com,
mmccune(a)redhat.com, nmoumoul(a)redhat.com,
obarenbo(a)redhat.com, paul(a)city-fan.org,
perl-devel(a)lists.fedoraproject.org, rchan(a)redhat.com,
rhughes(a)redhat.com, rjerrido(a)redhat.com,
rob.myers(a)gtri.gatech.edu, roliveri(a)redhat.com,
rstrode(a)redhat.com, sandmann(a)redhat.com,
simaishi(a)redhat.com, smallamp(a)redhat.com,
sokeeffe(a)redhat.com, tbrisker(a)redhat.com,
tcallawa(a)redhat.com, vondruch(a)redhat.com,
walter.pete(a)yandex.com, xavier(a)bachelot.org
Target Milestone: ---
Classification: Other
A possible DoS issue may affect several MIME parsers. Messages with too many
tiny nested MIME parts can lead to memory exhaustion on split().
References:
https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=960064https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=960062https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=960159https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=960158
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1835355
Bug ID: 1835355
Summary: perl-Email-MIME-ContentType: rubygem-mail: Out of
memory issue through nested MIME parts [epel-all]
Product: Fedora EPEL
Version: epel7
Status: NEW
Component: perl-Email-MIME-ContentType
Keywords: Security, SecurityTracking
Severity: medium
Priority: medium
Assignee: tcallawa(a)redhat.com
Reporter: psampaio(a)redhat.com
QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org
CC: jose.p.oliveira.oss(a)gmail.com,
perl-devel(a)lists.fedoraproject.org,
rob.myers(a)gtri.gatech.edu, tcallawa(a)redhat.com
Target Milestone: ---
Classification: Fedora
This is an automatically created tracking bug! It was created to ensure
that one or more security vulnerabilities are fixed in affected versions
of epel-all.
For comments that are specific to the vulnerability please use bugs filed
against the "Security Response" product referenced in the "Blocks" field.
For more information see:
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Security/TrackingBugs
When submitting as an update, use the fedpkg template provided in the next
comment(s). This will include the bug IDs of this tracking bug as well as
the relevant top-level CVE bugs.
Please also mention the CVE IDs being fixed in the RPM changelog and the
fedpkg commit message.
NOTE: this issue affects multiple supported versions of Fedora EPEL. While
only one tracking bug has been filed, please correct all affected versions
at the same time. If you need to fix the versions independent of each
other, you may clone this bug as appropriate.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1830000
Bug ID: 1830000
Summary: perl-Test-WWW-Mechanize-PSGI for EL7
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Status: NEW
Component: perl-Test-WWW-Mechanize-PSGI
Assignee: rc040203(a)freenet.de
Reporter: xavier(a)bachelot.org
QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org
CC: perl-devel(a)lists.fedoraproject.org,
rc040203(a)freenet.de
Target Milestone: ---
Classification: Fedora
Hi,
Could you please build perl-Test-WWW-Mechanize-PSGI in EPEL 7 ?
It's in the dependency chain of a package I'd like to build for EPEL 7.
Regards,
Xavier
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1829995
Bug ID: 1829995
Summary: perl-Test-WWW-Mechanize for EL7
Product: Fedora EPEL
Version: epel7
Status: NEW
Component: perl-Test-WWW-Mechanize
Assignee: tremble(a)tremble.org.uk
Reporter: xavier(a)bachelot.org
QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org
CC: jose.p.oliveira.oss(a)gmail.com,
perl-devel(a)lists.fedoraproject.org,
rc040203(a)freenet.de, tremble(a)tremble.org.uk
Target Milestone: ---
Classification: Fedora
Hi,
Could you please build perl-Test-WWW-Mechanize in EPEL 7 ?
It's in the dependency chain of a package I'd like to build for EPEL 7.
Regards,
Xavier
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2037854
Bug ID: 2037854
Summary: Please branch and build perl-Crypt-RC4 for EPEL 9
Product: Fedora EPEL
Version: epel9
Status: NEW
Component: perl-Crypt-RC4
Assignee: ppisar(a)redhat.com
Reporter: paul(a)city-fan.org
QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org
CC: me(a)fale.io, perl-devel(a)lists.fedoraproject.org,
ppisar(a)redhat.com
Target Milestone: ---
Classification: Fedora
Please branch and build perl-Crypt-RC4 for EPEL 9.
If you like you could add me (FAS: pghmcfc) as a committer to the package and
I'll do it myself.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2037854
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1821879
Bug ID: 1821879
Summary: CVE-2013-7488 perl-Convert-ASN1: allows remote
attackers to cause an infinite loop via unexpected
input
Product: Security Response
Hardware: All
OS: Linux
Status: NEW
Component: vulnerability
Keywords: Security
Severity: medium
Priority: medium
Assignee: security-response-team(a)redhat.com
Reporter: gsuckevi(a)redhat.com
CC: caillon+fedoraproject(a)gmail.com, caolanm(a)redhat.com,
john.j5live(a)gmail.com, jplesnik(a)redhat.com,
kasal(a)ucw.cz, perl-devel(a)lists.fedoraproject.org,
perl-maint-list(a)redhat.com, ppisar(a)redhat.com,
psabata(a)redhat.com, rhughes(a)redhat.com,
rstrode(a)redhat.com, sandmann(a)redhat.com
Target Milestone: ---
Classification: Other
perl-Convert-ASN1 (aka the Convert::ASN1 module for Perl) through 0.27 allows
remote attackers to cause an infinite loop via unexpected input.
Reference:
https://github.com/gbarr/perl-Convert-ASN1/issues/14
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2188459
Bug ID: 2188459
Summary: CVE-2022-36788 slic3r: Heap-based buffer overflow in
the TriangleMesh clone functionality [fedora-all]
Product: Fedora
Version: 38
Status: NEW
Component: slic3r
Keywords: Security, SecurityTracking
Severity: medium
Priority: medium
Assignee: mhroncok(a)redhat.com
Reporter: psampaio(a)redhat.com
QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org
CC: mhroncok(a)redhat.com,
perl-devel(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
Target Milestone: ---
Classification: Fedora
More information about this security flaw is available in the following bug:
http://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2188458
Disclaimer: Community trackers are created by Red Hat Product Security team on
a best effort basis. Package maintainers are required to ascertain if the flaw
indeed affects their package, before starting the update process.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2188459
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1941155
Bug ID: 1941155
Summary: perl-Crypt-OpenSSL-DSA-0.20 is available
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Status: NEW
Component: perl-Crypt-OpenSSL-DSA
Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged
Assignee: wjhns174(a)hardakers.net
Reporter: upstream-release-monitoring(a)fedoraproject.org
QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org
CC: perl-devel(a)lists.fedoraproject.org,
wjhns174(a)hardakers.net
Target Milestone: ---
Classification: Fedora
Latest upstream release: 0.20
Current version/release in rawhide: 0.19-15.fc34
URL: http://search.cpan.org/dist/Crypt-OpenSSL-DSA/
Please consult the package updates policy before you issue an update to a
stable branch: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/fesco/Updates_Policy/
More information about the service that created this bug can be found at:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Upstream_release_monitoring
Please keep in mind that with any upstream change, there may also be packaging
changes that need to be made. Specifically, please remember that it is your
responsibility to review the new version to ensure that the licensing is still
correct and that no non-free or legally problematic items have been added
upstream.
Based on the information from anitya:
https://release-monitoring.org/project/2745/
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2037658
Bug ID: 2037658
Summary: Please branch and build perl-MouseX-Foreign for EPEL 9
Product: Fedora EPEL
Version: epel9
Status: NEW
Component: perl-MouseX-Foreign
Assignee: emmanuel(a)seyman.fr
Reporter: paul(a)city-fan.org
QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org
CC: emmanuel(a)seyman.fr,
perl-devel(a)lists.fedoraproject.org, ppisar(a)redhat.com
Target Milestone: ---
Classification: Fedora
Could you please branch and build perl-MouseX-Foreign for EPEL 9 ?
If you like you could add me (FAS: pghmcfc) as a committer to the package and
I'll do it myself.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2037658
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2002396
Bug ID: 2002396
Summary: perl-Crypt-OpenSSL-RSA-0.32 is available
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Status: NEW
Component: perl-Crypt-OpenSSL-RSA
Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged
Assignee: wjhns174(a)hardakers.net
Reporter: upstream-release-monitoring(a)fedoraproject.org
QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org
CC: perl-devel(a)lists.fedoraproject.org,
wjhns174(a)hardakers.net
Target Milestone: ---
Classification: Fedora
Latest upstream release: 0.32
Current version/release in rawhide: 0.31-11.fc35
URL: http://search.cpan.org/dist/Crypt-OpenSSL-RSA/
Please consult the package updates policy before you issue an update to a
stable branch: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/fesco/Updates_Policy/
More information about the service that created this bug can be found at:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Upstream_release_monitoring
Please keep in mind that with any upstream change, there may also be packaging
changes that need to be made. Specifically, please remember that it is your
responsibility to review the new version to ensure that the licensing is still
correct and that no non-free or legally problematic items have been added
upstream.
Based on the information from anitya:
https://release-monitoring.org/project/2748/
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2165567
Bug ID: 2165567
Summary: Upgrade perl-Sub-Exporter-Lexical to 0.100000
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
URL: https://metacpan.org/release/Sub-Exporter-Lexical
Status: NEW
Component: perl-Sub-Exporter-Lexical
Assignee: rc040203(a)freenet.de
Reporter: jplesnik(a)redhat.com
QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org
CC: paul(a)city-fan.org, perl-devel(a)lists.fedoraproject.org,
rc040203(a)freenet.de
Target Milestone: ---
Classification: Fedora
Latest Fedora delivers 0.092292 version. Upstream released 0.100000. When you
have free time, please upgrade it.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2165567
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1716324
Bug ID: 1716324
Summary: perl-Text-Xslate-3.5.6-5.fc30 is not linked to
libperl.so
Product: Fedora
Version: 30
Status: NEW
Component: perl-Text-Xslate
Assignee: jplesnik(a)redhat.com
Reporter: ppisar(a)redhat.com
QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org
CC: i(a)cicku.me, jplesnik(a)redhat.com,
perl-devel(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
Target Milestone: ---
Classification: Fedora
perl-Text-Xslate-3.5.6-5.fc30 lost a dependency on libperl.so since
-Wl,--as-needed was added to distribution-wide linker flags:
$ scanelf -n blib/arch/auto/Text/Xslate/Xslate.so
TYPE NEEDED FILE
ET_DYN libc.so.6 blib/arch/auto/Text/Xslate/Xslate.so
$ ldd -r blib/arch/auto/Text/Xslate/Xslate.so
linux-vdso.so.1 (0x00007fff0d5cb000)
libc.so.6 => /lib64/libc.so.6 (0x00007f948b9a1000)
/lib64/ld-linux-x86-64.so.2 (0x00007f948bb8f000)
undefined symbol: Perl_sv_cmp (blib/arch/auto/Text/Xslate/Xslate.so)
undefined symbol: PL_ppaddr (blib/arch/auto/Text/Xslate/Xslate.so)
[...]
Xslate.so is built like this:
gcc -lpthread -shared -Wl,-z,relro -Wl,--as-needed -Wl,-z,now
-specs=/usr/lib/rpm/redhat/redhat-hardened-ld -L/usr/local/lib
-fstack-protector-strong -lperl -o blib/arch/auto/Text/Xslate/Xslate.so
lib/Text/Xslate.o src/xslate_methods.o
The cause is that -Wl,--as-needed takes effect when library is supplied and
considering only preceding object files and ignoring and following object
files. A correct linker command must list all object files before -l flags.
Like this:
gcc lib/Text/Xslate.o src/xslate_methods.o -lpthread -shared -Wl,-z,relro
-Wl,--as-needed -Wl,-z,now -specs=/usr/lib/rpm/redhat/redhat-hardened-ld
-L/usr/local/lib -fstack-protector-strong -lperl -o
blib/arch/auto/Text/Xslate/Xslate.so
Either there is bug in perl-Text-Xslate build script or in
Module::Build::XSUtil that it uses.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2175807
Bug ID: 2175807
Summary: perl-Git-Repository-1.325-7.fc39 FTBFS: t/20-simple.t
fails EDITOR tests
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
URL: https://koschei.fedoraproject.org/package/perl-Git-Rep
ository?collection=f39
Status: NEW
Component: perl-Git-Repository
Assignee: jpazdziora(a)redhat.com
Reporter: ppisar(a)redhat.com
QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org
CC: iarnell(a)gmail.com, jpazdziora(a)redhat.com,
perl-devel(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
Blocks: 2168842 (F39FTBFS,RAWHIDEFTBFS)
Target Milestone: ---
Classification: Fedora
perl-Git-Repository-1.325-7.fc39 fails to build in Fedora 39 because
t/20-simple.t test fails:
t/20-simple.t .............. 1/54
# Failed test 'git var GIT_EDITOR'
# at t/20-simple.t line 88.
#
# Failed test 'Git complains about lack of smarts and editor'
# at t/20-simple.t line 89.
#
# ''
# doesn't match '(?^:^fatal: Terminal is dumb, but EDITOR unset )'
#
# Looks like you failed 2 tests of 54.
t/20-simple.t .............. Dubious, test returned 2 (wstat 512, 0x200)
Failed 2/54 subtests
t/21-submodule.t ........... Cloning into '/tmp/TiMR_SSxRH/sub'...
done. at t/21-submodule.t line 46.
A difference between passing and failing build root is at
<https://koschei.fedoraproject.org/build/15041670>. This is probably triggered
by upgrading git from 2.39.2-1.fc39 to 2.40.0-0.1.rc1.fc39.
Referenced Bugs:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2168842
[Bug 2168842] Fedora 39 FTBFS Tracker
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2175807
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2181971
Bug ID: 2181971
Summary: perl-Glib-Object-Introspection-0.050 is available
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Status: NEW
Component: perl-Glib-Object-Introspection
Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged
Assignee: berrange(a)redhat.com
Reporter: upstream-release-monitoring(a)fedoraproject.org
QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org
CC: berrange(a)redhat.com,
perl-devel(a)lists.fedoraproject.org, sergio(a)serjux.com
Target Milestone: ---
Classification: Fedora
Releases retrieved: 0.050
Upstream release that is considered latest: 0.050
Current version/release in rawhide: 0.049-11.fc38
URL: http://search.cpan.org/dist/Glib-Object-Introspection/
Please consult the package updates policy before you issue an update to a
stable branch: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/fesco/Updates_Policy/
More information about the service that created this bug can be found at:
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/package-maintainers/Upstream_Release_M…
Please keep in mind that with any upstream change, there may also be packaging
changes that need to be made. Specifically, please remember that it is your
responsibility to review the new version to ensure that the licensing is still
correct and that no non-free or legally problematic items have been added
upstream.
Based on the information from Anitya:
https://release-monitoring.org/project/2924/
To change the monitoring settings for the project, please visit:
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/perl-Glib-Object-Introspection
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2181971
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1936241
Bug ID: 1936241
Summary: Compiled @INC in 5.32 No longer Includes Suitable Path
For Custom System-Wide Modules
Product: Fedora
Version: 33
Hardware: All
OS: Linux
Status: NEW
Component: perl
Severity: medium
Assignee: jplesnik(a)redhat.com
Reporter: claywj(a)gmail.com
QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org
CC: caillon+fedoraproject(a)gmail.com, iarnell(a)gmail.com,
jplesnik(a)redhat.com, kasal(a)ucw.cz,
mmaslano(a)redhat.com,
perl-devel(a)lists.fedoraproject.org, ppisar(a)redhat.com,
psabata(a)redhat.com, rhughes(a)redhat.com,
sandmann(a)redhat.com, spotrh(a)gmail.com
Target Milestone: ---
Classification: Fedora
Description of problem:
Removing /usr/local/share/perl5 for the version specific dir with 5.32 from the
compiled @INC makes it difficult to maintain custom system wide modules apart
from the standard rpm/CPAN locations when upgrading.
As this is done during build, is it possible to get it added back in the next
version?
Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
5.32
How reproducible:
perl -e 'print "@INC\n"'
Steps to Reproduce:
1. Using CVS/SCM software to update a custom module, it goes to the expected
old location no longer part of @INC and the changes are not seen.
Actual results:
See above
Expected results:
The path would remain and the changes seen
Additional info:
Yes, CVS/SCM can be changed but in this case the update came across on "Thu 25
Feb 2021 04:46:53 PM CST" during updates. The installer did relocate the
existing custom modules to ./5.32 but the change was not noticed until an
update to one of the custom modules took place
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1731721
Bug ID: 1731721
Summary: perl-Font-AFM depends on files/directories from
non-standard locations
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Status: NEW
Component: perl-Font-AFM
Assignee: rc040203(a)freenet.de
Reporter: i.gnatenko.brain(a)gmail.com
QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org
CC: lxtnow(a)gmail.com, perl-devel(a)lists.fedoraproject.org,
rc040203(a)freenet.de, rob.myers(a)gtri.gatech.edu,
tcallawa(a)redhat.com, tremble(a)tremble.org.uk
Blocks: 1731683
Target Milestone: ---
Classification: Fedora
Hello,
Fedora Packaging Guidelines allow dependencies only on files/directories from
/usr/bin, /usr/sbin and /etc directories[0].
Your package depends on files/directories outside of those. See below for more
information about package/dependencies.
---
perl-Font-AFM-1.20-30.fc31.src:
- /usr/share/a2ps/afm/phvr.afm
---
Please correct those or provide reason why is it correct.
It is very important to not download huge filelists.xml just because few
packages in distribution depend on non-standard paths.
Thanks for cooperation!
[0]
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/packaging-guidelines/#_file_and_direct…
Referenced Bugs:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1731683
[Bug 1731683] Packages which are not following Packaging Guidelines
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1731700
Bug ID: 1731700
Summary: rt depends on files/directories from non-standard
locations
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Status: NEW
Component: rt
Assignee: rc040203(a)freenet.de
Reporter: i.gnatenko.brain(a)gmail.com
QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org
CC: perl-devel(a)lists.fedoraproject.org,
rc040203(a)freenet.de, tibbs(a)math.uh.edu
Blocks: 1731683
Target Milestone: ---
Classification: Fedora
Hello,
Fedora Packaging Guidelines allow dependencies only on files/directories from
/usr/bin, /usr/sbin and /etc directories[0].
Your package depends on files/directories outside of those. See below for more
information about package/dependencies.
---
rt-4.4.4-2.fc31.noarch:
- /usr/share/fonts/google-droid/DroidSansFallback.ttf
- /usr/share/fonts/google-droid/DroidSans.ttf
rt-4.4.4-2.fc31.src:
- /usr/share/fonts/google-droid/DroidSansFallback.ttf
- /usr/share/fonts/google-droid/DroidSans.ttf
---
Please correct those or provide reason why is it correct.
It is very important to not download huge filelists.xml just because few
packages in distribution depend on non-standard paths.
Thanks for cooperation!
[0]
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/packaging-guidelines/#_file_and_direct…
Referenced Bugs:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1731683
[Bug 1731683] Packages which are not following Packaging Guidelines
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1731718
Bug ID: 1731718
Summary: perl-Convert-Color depends on files/directories from
non-standard locations
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Status: NEW
Component: perl-Convert-Color
Assignee: rc040203(a)freenet.de
Reporter: i.gnatenko.brain(a)gmail.com
QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org
CC: perl-devel(a)lists.fedoraproject.org,
rc040203(a)freenet.de
Blocks: 1731683
Target Milestone: ---
Classification: Fedora
Hello,
Fedora Packaging Guidelines allow dependencies only on files/directories from
/usr/bin, /usr/sbin and /etc directories[0].
Your package depends on files/directories outside of those. See below for more
information about package/dependencies.
---
perl-Convert-Color-0.11-16.fc31.src:
- /usr/share/X11/rgb.txt
---
Please correct those or provide reason why is it correct.
It is very important to not download huge filelists.xml just because few
packages in distribution depend on non-standard paths.
Thanks for cooperation!
[0]
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/packaging-guidelines/#_file_and_direct…
Referenced Bugs:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1731683
[Bug 1731683] Packages which are not following Packaging Guidelines
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2184280
Bug ID: 2184280
Summary: Please upgrade perl-Lexical-Var to >= 0.010
Product: Fedora
Version: 38
Status: NEW
Component: perl-Lexical-Var
Assignee: jplesnik(a)redhat.com
Reporter: rc040203(a)freenet.de
QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org
CC: jplesnik(a)redhat.com, paul(a)city-fan.org,
perl-devel(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
Target Milestone: ---
Classification: Fedora
Description of problem:
Please upgrade perl-Lexical-Var to >= 0.010 on all Fedora releases < 39.
perl-Lexical-Var >= 0.10 is required by perl-Sub-Exporter-Lexical-1.000
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2184280
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2161639
Bug ID: 2161639
Summary: Pregenerated File-RsyncP-0.76/FileList/configure is
missing a source
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Status: NEW
Component: perl-File-RsyncP
Assignee: jplesnik(a)redhat.com
Reporter: ppisar(a)redhat.com
QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org
CC: imlinux+fedora(a)gmail.com, jplesnik(a)redhat.com,
perl-devel(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
Target Milestone: ---
Link ID: Red Hat Bugzilla 199647
Classification: Fedora
perl-File-RsyncP-0.76-10.fc38 source package delivers
File-RsyncP-0.76/FileList/configure file which itsels was generated with
Autoconf, but the original source for Autoconf tool (configure.in according to
File-RsyncP-0.76/FileList/Makefile.PL is missing from the source archive and
thus from the source package.
While the file is licensed as FSFULL which does not require distributing
sources, it is deemed to be against Fedora spirit (and Packaging guidelines?)
<https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/packaging@lists.fedoraproject…>.
We should either reimplement configure.in or remove this package from a
distribution.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2161639
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2215065
Bug ID: 2215065
Summary: perl-Coro doesn't exist in EPEL 9 and FTBFS when I'm
trying to build it
Product: Fedora EPEL
Version: epel9
Hardware: All
OS: Linux
Status: NEW
Component: perl-Coro
Assignee: emmanuel(a)seyman.fr
Reporter: yaroslav(a)fedevych.name
QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org
CC: emmanuel(a)seyman.fr, mspacek(a)redhat.com,
perl-devel(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
Target Milestone: ---
Classification: Fedora
Description of problem:
I'm trying to build the perl-Coro package for EPEL 9 in my COPR; apart from
missing a dependency (which can be provided easily enough), it fails its own
tests in Coro::Event by blocking forever in Event/t/01_unblock.t, which I've
able to track down to a do_timer() -> Coro::schedule call, inside of which it's
just sitting there forever in pselect() call that keeps timing out with no
events, as strace shows.
When I skip only the Coro::Event-specific problematic tests, all other tests
pass.
This is only happening in the EL9 environment. Using mock on a Fedora 38 host,
the same machine builds the exact same source package just fine on el8, f38,
and f39 with all tests passing, but freezes invariably on el9.
My COPR (jafd/perl-modules) logs show that it freezes in the same place
independently of architecture, as I build there for aarch64 and x86_64, thus
pointing at some kind of EL9-specific userspace problem.
(https://download.copr.fedorainfracloud.org/results/jafd/perl-modules/epel-9…)
I'm wondering if it's something the maintainers have run into already and thus
stopped building perl-Coro for EPEL 9. I'd like to help however I can to fix
this — if I knew how.
I've tried downgrading perl-Event to 1.27, the same version EL8 has, and it
doesn't help.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2215065
Report this comment as SPAM: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla&format=report-sp…
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2208967
Bug ID: 2208967
Summary: perl-GnuPG-Interface-1.02-7.fc39 FTBFS: tests fail
with gnupg2-2.4.1
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
URL: https://koschei.fedoraproject.org/package/perl-GnuPG-I
nterface
OS: Linux
Status: NEW
Component: perl-GnuPG-Interface
Severity: medium
Assignee: emmanuel(a)seyman.fr
Reporter: ppisar(a)redhat.com
QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org
CC: emmanuel(a)seyman.fr, fedora(a)mj41.cz,
perl-devel(a)lists.fedoraproject.org,
xavier(a)bachelot.org
Target Milestone: ---
Classification: Fedora
perl-GnuPG-Interface-1.02-7.fc39 fails to build in Fedora 39 because tests
fail:
t/Fingerprint.t ............ ok
t/get_public_keys.t ........
Failed 2/3 subtests
t/get_secret_keys.t ........
Failed 1/2 subtests
t/import_keys.t ............ ok
t/Interface.t .............. ok
t/list_public_keys.t ....... ok
t/list_secret_keys.t .......
Failed 1/4 subtests
t/list_sigs.t .............. ok
t/passphrase_handling.t .... ok
t/sign.t ................... ok
t/sign_and_encrypt.t ....... ok
t/UserId.t ................. ok
t/verify.t ................. ok
t/version_updates.t ........ ok
t/wrap_call.t .............. ok
t/z_delete_keys.t .......... ok
t/zzz_cleanup.t ............ ok
Test Summary Report
-------------------
t/get_public_keys.t (Wstat: 0 Tests: 3 Failed: 2)
Failed tests: 2-3
t/get_secret_keys.t (Wstat: 0 Tests: 2 Failed: 1)
Failed test: 2
t/list_secret_keys.t (Wstat: 0 Tests: 4 Failed: 1)
Failed test: 2
Files=24, Tests=62, 11 wallclock secs ( 0.08 usr 0.04 sys + 6.65 cusr 1.91
csys = 8.68 CPU)
Result: FAIL
gpg-connect-agent: no running gpg-agent - starting '/usr/bin/gpg-agent'
gpg-connect-agent: waiting for the agent to come up ... (5s)
gpg-connect-agent: connection to the agent established
gpg-agent[303]: gpg-agent running and available
subkeys fail comparison; this is a known issue with GnuPG 1.0.1 at
t/get_public_keys.t line 212.
gpg: using "0x93AFC4B1B0288A104996B44253AE596EF950DA9C" as default secret key
for signing
Failed 3/24 test programs. 4/62 subtests failed.
make: *** [Makefile:801: test_dynamic] Error 255
error: Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.TEALvJ (%check)
A difference between passing and failing build root is at
<https://koschei.fedoraproject.org/build/15468273>. An upgrade of gnupg2 from
2.4.0-3.fc39 to 2.4.1-1.fc39 is suspicious.
Reproducible: Always
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2208967
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2154738
Bug ID: 2154738
Summary: [abrt] slic3r: stl_add_facet(): perl killed by SIGABRT
Product: Fedora
Version: 37
Hardware: x86_64
Status: NEW
Whiteboard: abrt_hash:67e6509db17b71dbc3796572867dda4c31f0e967;
Component: slic3r
Assignee: mhroncok(a)redhat.com
Reporter: ol+redhat(a)infoserver.lv
QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org
CC: mhroncok(a)redhat.com,
perl-devel(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
Target Milestone: ---
Classification: Fedora
Description of problem:
Trying to slice EF_Front_v3.stl file from
https://www.thingiverse.com/thing:4785984
Version-Release number of selected component:
slic3r-1.3.0-27.fc37
Additional info:
reporter: libreport-2.17.4
backtrace_rating: 4
cgroup:
0::/user.slice/user-1364.slice/user@1364.service/app.slice/app-slic3r-3121d84c542244a3ae9cc91a239ca22a.scope
cmdline: /usr/bin/perl /usr/bin/slic3r
crash_function: stl_add_facet
executable: /usr/bin/perl
journald_cursor:
s=1507985f41d24fd8998d78c5690bc8f4;i=1ec6854;b=ee556b81838a4b7dbed054a383432cc5;m=3716e063;t=5f02544515059;x=a43591764f8f71fd
kernel: 6.0.12-300.fc37.x86_64
rootdir: /
runlevel: N 5
type: CCpp
uid: 1364
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2154738
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2074940
Bug ID: 2074940
Summary: Remove usage of gethostbyname() and inet_addr() from
perl-FCGI package
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Status: NEW
Component: perl-FCGI
Assignee: emmanuel(a)seyman.fr
Reporter: mspacek(a)redhat.com
QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org
CC: bstinson(a)redhat.com, emmanuel(a)seyman.fr,
iarnell(a)gmail.com, jwboyer(a)redhat.com,
mspacek(a)redhat.com,
perl-devel(a)lists.fedoraproject.org,
perl-maint-list(a)redhat.com,
rhel-cs-apps-subsystem-qe(a)redhat.com
Depends On: 1979848
Target Milestone: ---
Classification: Fedora
+++ This bug was initially created as a clone of Bug #1979848 +++
Description of problem:
rpminspect is failing in gating
Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
perl-FCGI-0.79-7.el9
Actual results:
Forbidden function symbols found:
gethostbyname
inet_addr
Expected results:
no forbidden functions
Referenced Bugs:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1979848
[Bug 1979848] Remove usage of gethostbyname() and inet_addr() from perl-FCGI
package
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2074940
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2063919
Bug ID: 2063919
Summary: Packages Perl tests should not generate Provides
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Status: NEW
Component: perl-generators
Assignee: jplesnik(a)redhat.com
Reporter: ppisar(a)redhat.com
QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org
CC: jplesnik(a)redhat.com, mspacek(a)redhat.com,
perl-devel(a)lists.fedoraproject.org, ppisar(a)redhat.com
Target Milestone: ---
Classification: Fedora
I noticed that packaged tests in /usr/libexec/... generates Provides because
they are matched by perllib.attr:
$ cat /usr/lib/rpm/fileattrs/perllib.attr
%__perllib_provides %{_rpmconfigdir}/perl.prov
%__perllib_requires %{_rpmconfigdir}/perl.req
%__perllib_magic ^Perl[[:digit:]] module source.*
%__perllib_path \\.pm$
%__perllib_flags magic_and_path
I think they were meant to be only covered with perltest.attr:
# cat /usr/lib/rpm/fileattrs/perltest.attr
%__perltest_requires %{_rpmconfigdir}/perl.req
%__perltest_magic ^.*[Pp]erl[[:digit:]]* .*$
%__perltest_path /usr/libexec/.*\\.(pl|pm|t)$
%__perltest_flags magic_and_path
But perltest.attr is more similar to perl.attr, it's about scripts:
$ cat /usr/lib/rpm/fileattrs/perl.attr
%__perl_requires %{_rpmconfigdir}/perl.req
%__perl_magic ^.*[Pp]erl .*$
%__perl_flags exeonly
Would it be possible to change perllib.attr to match only files under
/usr/{share,lib,lib64}/perl?
Observed with perl-generators-1.13-5.fc36.noarch.
(I find out that filtering those Provides with %__exclude_provides is a problem
when the tests involve symlinks to modules in the main package. See
perl-Module-Install-TestBase-tests-0.86-24.fc36 which erroneously provides
perl(Module::Install::TestBase)
<https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=1892296>. I will try to
work it around on packaged file level in perl-Module-Install-TestBase.)
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2063919
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2212317
Bug ID: 2212317
Summary: IPv6 is not working
Product: Fedora
Version: 37
OS: Linux
Status: NEW
Component: perl-SNMP_Session
Severity: medium
Assignee: spotrh(a)gmail.com
Reporter: mspacek(a)redhat.com
QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org
CC: perl-devel(a)lists.fedoraproject.org, spotrh(a)gmail.com
Target Milestone: ---
Classification: Fedora
SNMP_Session Perl library has issue in usage of IPv6.
Fix is in
https://github.com/sleinen/snmp-session/pull/15/commits/599378943bf3cac92fd…
Reproducible: Always
Steps to Reproduce:
1. Set SNMP with IPv6 only (agentaddress [::1] in /etc/snmp/snmpd.conf)
2. Run the example in the attachment with: ./test.pl '[::1]' and check result.
Actual Results:
Error:
can't resolve "[::1]" to IP address
at ./test.pl line 19.
Couldn't open SNMP session to [::1]:161. at /__PATH_TO_TEST__/test.pl line 20.
Expected Results:
Something like:
1.3.6.1.2.1.1.1.0 => Linux man 6.2.15-300.fc38.x86_64 #1 SMP PREEMPT_DYNAMIC
Thu May 11 17:37:39 UTC 2023 x86_64
1.3.6.1.2.1.1.4.0 => Root <root@localhost> (configure
/etc/snmp/snmp.local.conf)
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2212317
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1666098
Bug ID: 1666098
Summary: Overspecification in perl -MExtUtils::Embed -e ldopts
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Status: NEW
Component: perl
Assignee: jplesnik(a)redhat.com
Reporter: bugs.michael(a)gmx.net
QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org
CC: caillon+fedoraproject(a)gmail.com, iarnell(a)gmail.com,
jplesnik(a)redhat.com, kasal(a)ucw.cz,
mbarnes(a)fastmail.com, mmaslano(a)redhat.com,
perl-devel(a)lists.fedoraproject.org, ppisar(a)redhat.com,
psabata(a)redhat.com, rhughes(a)redhat.com,
sandmann(a)redhat.com, tcallawa(a)redhat.com
Target Milestone: ---
Classification: Fedora
The following command is supposed to return the ldflags that are needed to link
with libperl. Instead, it returns everything that has been specified when
building libperl itself. Not limited to Fedora's global flags and several
libraries that aren't needed when linking shared. As a result, programs relink
also with those libs instead of just libperl.
$ perl -MExtUtils::Embed -e ldopts
-Wl,--enable-new-dtags -Wl,-z,relro -Wl,-z,now
-specs=/usr/lib/rpm/redhat/redhat-hardened-ld -Wl,-z,relro -Wl,-z,now
-specs=/usr/lib/rpm/redhat/redhat-hardened-ld -fstack-protector-strong
-L/usr/local/lib -L/usr/lib64/perl5/CORE -lperl -lpthread -lresolv -ldl -lm
-lcrypt -lutil -lc
Please clean up the flags and return only -L/usr/lib64/perl5/CORE -lperl.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2030311
Bug ID: 2030311
Summary: Please branch and build perl-Authen-Krb5 in epel9
Product: Fedora EPEL
Version: epel9
Status: NEW
Component: perl-Authen-Krb5
Assignee: simon(a)sxw.org.uk
Reporter: alex.iribarren(a)cern.ch
QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org
CC: perl-devel(a)lists.fedoraproject.org, simon(a)sxw.org.uk
Target Milestone: ---
Classification: Fedora
Description of problem:
Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
How reproducible:
Steps to Reproduce:
1.
2.
3.
Actual results:
Expected results:
Additional info:
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2030311
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2207950
Bug ID: 2207950
Summary: Please build perl-Frontier-RPC for EPEL9
Product: Fedora EPEL
Version: epel9
Status: NEW
Component: perl-Frontier-RPC
Assignee: mmraka(a)redhat.com
Reporter: rik.theys(a)esat.kuleuven.be
QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org
CC: jplesnik(a)redhat.com, kasal(a)ucw.cz, mmraka(a)redhat.com,
mspacek(a)redhat.com,
perl-devel(a)lists.fedoraproject.org,
rhughes(a)redhat.com, rstrode(a)redhat.com
Target Milestone: ---
Classification: Fedora
Hi,
We are running some applications that still require perl-Frontier-RPC-Client.
Would it be possible to also provide a package for EPEL9?
Regards,
Rik
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2207950
otaylor opened a new pull-request against the project: `perl` that you are following:
``
Make builds for inclusion in an application Flatpak work
``
To reply, visit the link below
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/perl/pull-request/1
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2149107
Bug ID: 2149107
Summary: Please branch and build package in epel9
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Status: NEW
Component: perl-REST-Client
Assignee: emmanuel(a)seyman.fr
Reporter: emmanuel(a)seyman.fr
QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org
CC: emmanuel(a)seyman.fr, perl-devel(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
Target Milestone: ---
Classification: Fedora
I've received private email asking me to branch and build this package in
epel9.
I'm creating a bug in Bugzilla to better track the issue.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2149107
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2149109
Bug ID: 2149109
Summary: Please branch and build package in epel9
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Status: NEW
Component: perl-HTTP-Server-Simple
Assignee: spotrh(a)gmail.com
Reporter: emmanuel(a)seyman.fr
QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org
CC: jose.p.oliveira.oss(a)gmail.com,
perl-devel(a)lists.fedoraproject.org, spotrh(a)gmail.com
Blocks: 2149107
Target Milestone: ---
Classification: Fedora
I've been asked over in bug #2149107 to branch perl-REST-Client for EPEL9.
Since that package requires this one to build, I'm asking you to branch
perl-HTTP-Server-Simple for EPEL9 as well.
I'll be happy to maintain it if it's too much trouble for you.
Referenced Bugs:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2149107
[Bug 2149107] Please branch and build package in epel9
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2149109
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1860591
Bug ID: 1860591
Summary: perl-mime-construct missing in EPEL 8
Product: Fedora EPEL
Version: epel8
Status: NEW
Component: perl-mime-construct
Assignee: mrunge(a)redhat.com
Reporter: necci(a)dia.uniroma3.it
QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org
CC: emmanuel(a)seyman.fr, mrunge(a)redhat.com,
perl-devel(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
Target Milestone: ---
Classification: Fedora
Description of problem:
perl-mime-construct is missing in EPEL 8, may someone provide it?
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2215048
Bug ID: 2215048
Summary: Please build perl-EV for EPEL9
Product: Fedora EPEL
Version: epel9
Hardware: All
OS: Linux
Status: NEW
Component: perl-EV
Assignee: carl(a)redhat.com
Reporter: yaroslav(a)fedevych.name
QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org
CC: carl(a)redhat.com, emmanuel(a)seyman.fr,
perl-devel(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
Target Milestone: ---
Classification: Fedora
Description of problem:
perl-EV does not exist in EPEL 9. This also makes it difficult to build
packages that depend on it.
The package itself can be built fine in my COPR (as can be seen here:
https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/jafd/perl-modules/build/6073999/) but
here for some reason builds exist for el7, el8, but not for el9.
Maybe there is a reason an el9 build does not exist? I'm willing to help get it
there if someone tells me how.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2215048
Report this comment as SPAM: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla&format=report-sp…
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1860592
Bug ID: 1860592
Summary: perl-Proc-WaitStat missing in EPEL 8
Product: Fedora EPEL
Version: epel8
Status: NEW
Component: perl-Proc-WaitStat
Assignee: mrunge(a)redhat.com
Reporter: necci(a)dia.uniroma3.it
QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org
CC: emmanuel(a)seyman.fr, mrunge(a)redhat.com,
perl-devel(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
Target Milestone: ---
Classification: Fedora
Description of problem:
perl-Proc-WaitStat is missing in EPEL 8, may someone provide it?
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1860590
Bug ID: 1860590
Summary: perl-IPC-Signal missing in EPEL 8
Product: Fedora EPEL
Version: epel8
Status: NEW
Component: perl-IPC-Signal
Assignee: mrunge(a)redhat.com
Reporter: necci(a)dia.uniroma3.it
QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org
CC: emmanuel(a)seyman.fr, mrunge(a)redhat.com,
perl-devel(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
Target Milestone: ---
Classification: Fedora
Description of problem:
perl-IPC-Signal is missing in EPEL 8, may someone provide it?
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.