https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1803973
Bug ID: 1803973
Summary: CGI::Session is missing in epel8
Product: Fedora EPEL
Version: epel8
Status: NEW
Component: perl-CGI-Session
Assignee: andreas(a)bawue.net
Reporter: netwiz(a)crc.id.au
QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org
CC: andreas(a)bawue.net, perl-devel(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
Target Milestone: ---
Classification: Fedora
The perl-CGI-Session package is not available for EPEL8.
Please import & build for EPEL8.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2232293
Bug ID: 2232293
Summary: perl-TAP-Formatter-JUnit-0.16-4.fc40 FTBFS: Failed
test 't/data/tests/bailout'
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
URL: https://koschei.fedoraproject.org/package/perl-TAP-For
matter-JUnit?collection=f40
Status: NEW
Component: perl-TAP-Formatter-JUnit
Assignee: paul(a)city-fan.org
Reporter: ppisar(a)redhat.com
QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org
CC: paul(a)city-fan.org, perl-devel(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
Blocks: 2231791 (F40FTBFS,RAWHIDEFTBFS)
Target Milestone: ---
Link ID: Github bleargh45/TAP-Formatter-JUnit/issues/15
Classification: Fedora
perl-TAP-Formatter-JUnit-0.16-4.fc40 fails to build because a test fails:
# Failed test 't/data/tests/bailout'
# at t/formatter.t line 54.
# During compare:
# junk after document element at line 17, column 13, byte 381
# GOT: <testsuites>
# <testsuite failures="0"
# tests="5"
# errors="0"
# name="data_tests_bailout">
# <testcase name="1"></testcase>
# <testcase name="2"></testcase>
# <testcase name="3"></testcase>
# <system-out><![CDATA[1..5
# ok 1
# ok 2
# ok 3
# Bail out! GERONIMMMOOOOOO!!!
# ]]></system-out>
# <system-err></system-err>
# </testsuite>
# </testsuites><testsuites>
# <testsuite failures="0"
# tests="5"
# errors="0"
# name="data_tests_bailout">
# <testcase name="1"></testcase>
# <testcase name="2"></testcase>
# <testcase name="3"></testcase>
# <system-out></system-out>
# <system-err></system-err>
# </testsuite>
# </testsuites>
# Looks like you failed 1 test of 22.
This is triggered by upgrading perl-Test-Harness from 1:3.44-501.fc39 to
1:3.46-1.fc40.
Referenced Bugs:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2231791
[Bug 2231791] Fedora 40 FTBFS Tracker
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2232293
Report this comment as SPAM: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla&format=report-sp…
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2184301
Bug ID: 2184301
Summary: perl-Syntax-Feature-Loop-1.8.0-18.fc39 FTBFS:
t/01_basic.t and 3more test fail
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
URL: https://koschei.fedoraproject.org/package/perl-Syntax-
Feature-Loop
Status: NEW
Component: perl-Syntax-Feature-Loop
Assignee: jplesnik(a)redhat.com
Reporter: jplesnik(a)redhat.com
QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org
CC: jplesnik(a)redhat.com,
perl-devel(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
Target Milestone: ---
Link ID: CPAN 147485
Classification: Fedora
Description of problem:
Package perl-Syntax-Feature-Loop fails to build from source in Fedora Rawhide.
Bareword found where operator expected at t/01_basic.t line 20, near "loop"
(Missing semicolon on previous line?)
syntax error at t/01_basic.t line 19, near "; last "
Global symbol "$s" requires explicit package name (did you forget to declare
"my $s"?) at t/01_basic.t line 20.
Global symbol "$i" requires explicit package name (did you forget to declare
"my $i"?) at t/01_basic.t line 20.
Global symbol "$s" requires explicit package name (did you forget to declare
"my $s"?) at t/01_basic.t line 20.
Global symbol "$s" requires explicit package name (did you forget to declare
"my $s"?) at t/01_basic.t line 21.
syntax error at t/01_basic.t line 22, near "}"
Can't redeclare "my" in "my" at t/01_basic.t line 26, near "my"
syntax error at t/01_basic.t line 28, near "last if"
syntax error at t/01_basic.t line 36, near "}"
syntax error at t/01_basic.t line 38, near "}"
t/01_basic.t has too many errors.
# Looks like your test exited with 2 before it could output anything.
t/01_basic.t ............
Dubious, test returned 2 (wstat 512, 0x200)
Failed 4/4 subtests
Bareword found where operator expected at t/02_pragma_a.t line 28, near "is"
(Missing semicolon on previous line?)
syntax error at t/02_pragma_a.t line 27, near "; last"
BEGIN not safe after errors--compilation aborted at t/02_pragma_a.t line 31.
# Looks like your test exited with 2 before it could output anything.
t/02_pragma_a.t .........
Dubious, test returned 2 (wstat 512, 0x200)
Failed 6/6 subtests
Bareword found where operator expected at t/02_pragma_b.t line 28, near "is"
(Missing semicolon on previous line?)
syntax error at t/02_pragma_b.t line 27, near "; last"
BEGIN not safe after errors--compilation aborted at t/02_pragma_b.t line 31.
# Looks like your test exited with 2 before it could output anything.
t/02_pragma_b.t .........
Dubious, test returned 2 (wstat 512, 0x200)
Failed 6/6 subtests
Semicolon seems to be missing at t/03_line_numbers.t line 112.
syntax error at t/03_line_numbers.t line 102, near "is"
syntax error at t/03_line_numbers.t line 112, near "}"
Execution of t/03_line_numbers.t aborted due to compilation errors.
# Looks like your test exited with 255 before it could output anything.
t/03_line_numbers.t .....
Dubious, test returned 255 (wstat 65280, 0xff00)
Failed 5/5 subtests
A difference between passing and failing build root is at
https://koschei.fedoraproject.org/build/15176950. An update of perl-Lexical-Var
from 0.009-31.fc38 to 0.010-1.fc39 is suspicious.
Additional info:
This package is tracked by Koschei. See:
https://koschei.fedoraproject.org/package/perl-Syntax-Feature-Loop
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2184301
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2028353
Bug ID: 2028353
Summary: Request to update perl-CDB_File to 1.03 (or newer)
Product: Fedora EPEL
Version: epel8
Hardware: All
OS: Linux
Status: NEW
Component: perl-CDB_File
Severity: high
Assignee: mmckinst(a)umich.edu
Reporter: fhirtz(a)redhat.com
QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org
CC: mmckinst(a)umich.edu, perl-devel(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
Target Milestone: ---
Classification: Fedora
Description of problem:
Good morning,
I'm working with someone who's running into a significant issue with an
automation system that they use (quattor.org) due to a bug in the version of
perl-CDB_File that's currently available in EPEL.
The bug in question is:
https://github.com/toddr/CDB_File/commit/9147df2c426b6ef8530fbc501e030168e1…
This was addressed in version 1.03 and we were seeing if it might be possible
to either include the patch as a backport, or more likely rebase to 1.03 (or
newer)?
Thank you!
Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
perl-CDB_File-1.02
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2028353
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2037860
Bug ID: 2037860
Summary: Please branch and build perl-HTML-Element-Extended for
EPEL 9
Product: Fedora EPEL
Version: epel9
Status: NEW
Component: perl-HTML-Element-Extended
Assignee: notting(a)splat.cc
Reporter: paul(a)city-fan.org
QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org
CC: emmanuel(a)seyman.fr, notting(a)splat.cc,
perl-devel(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
Target Milestone: ---
Classification: Fedora
Could you please branch and build perl-HTML-Element-Extended for EPEL 9 ?
If you like you could add me (FAS: pghmcfc) as a committer to the package and
I'll do it myself.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2037860
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1835353
Bug ID: 1835353
Summary: rubygem-mail: Out of memory issue through nested MIME
parts
Product: Security Response
Hardware: All
OS: Linux
Status: NEW
Component: vulnerability
Keywords: Security
Severity: medium
Priority: medium
Assignee: security-response-team(a)redhat.com
Reporter: psampaio(a)redhat.com
CC: akarol(a)redhat.com, alexl(a)redhat.com,
bbuckingham(a)redhat.com, bcourt(a)redhat.com,
bkearney(a)redhat.com, btotty(a)redhat.com,
caillon+fedoraproject(a)gmail.com, caolanm(a)redhat.com,
dmetzger(a)redhat.com, gmccullo(a)redhat.com,
gnome-sig(a)lists.fedoraproject.org,
gtanzill(a)redhat.com, hhudgeon(a)redhat.com,
jfrey(a)redhat.com, jhardy(a)redhat.com,
john.j5live(a)gmail.com, jose.p.oliveira.oss(a)gmail.com,
lzap(a)redhat.com, mclasen(a)redhat.com,
mmccune(a)redhat.com, nmoumoul(a)redhat.com,
obarenbo(a)redhat.com, paul(a)city-fan.org,
perl-devel(a)lists.fedoraproject.org, rchan(a)redhat.com,
rhughes(a)redhat.com, rjerrido(a)redhat.com,
rob.myers(a)gtri.gatech.edu, roliveri(a)redhat.com,
rstrode(a)redhat.com, sandmann(a)redhat.com,
simaishi(a)redhat.com, smallamp(a)redhat.com,
sokeeffe(a)redhat.com, tbrisker(a)redhat.com,
tcallawa(a)redhat.com, vondruch(a)redhat.com,
walter.pete(a)yandex.com, xavier(a)bachelot.org
Target Milestone: ---
Classification: Other
A possible DoS issue may affect several MIME parsers. Messages with too many
tiny nested MIME parts can lead to memory exhaustion on split().
References:
https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=960064https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=960062https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=960159https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=960158
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1835355
Bug ID: 1835355
Summary: perl-Email-MIME-ContentType: rubygem-mail: Out of
memory issue through nested MIME parts [epel-all]
Product: Fedora EPEL
Version: epel7
Status: NEW
Component: perl-Email-MIME-ContentType
Keywords: Security, SecurityTracking
Severity: medium
Priority: medium
Assignee: tcallawa(a)redhat.com
Reporter: psampaio(a)redhat.com
QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org
CC: jose.p.oliveira.oss(a)gmail.com,
perl-devel(a)lists.fedoraproject.org,
rob.myers(a)gtri.gatech.edu, tcallawa(a)redhat.com
Target Milestone: ---
Classification: Fedora
This is an automatically created tracking bug! It was created to ensure
that one or more security vulnerabilities are fixed in affected versions
of epel-all.
For comments that are specific to the vulnerability please use bugs filed
against the "Security Response" product referenced in the "Blocks" field.
For more information see:
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Security/TrackingBugs
When submitting as an update, use the fedpkg template provided in the next
comment(s). This will include the bug IDs of this tracking bug as well as
the relevant top-level CVE bugs.
Please also mention the CVE IDs being fixed in the RPM changelog and the
fedpkg commit message.
NOTE: this issue affects multiple supported versions of Fedora EPEL. While
only one tracking bug has been filed, please correct all affected versions
at the same time. If you need to fix the versions independent of each
other, you may clone this bug as appropriate.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1830000
Bug ID: 1830000
Summary: perl-Test-WWW-Mechanize-PSGI for EL7
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Status: NEW
Component: perl-Test-WWW-Mechanize-PSGI
Assignee: rc040203(a)freenet.de
Reporter: xavier(a)bachelot.org
QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org
CC: perl-devel(a)lists.fedoraproject.org,
rc040203(a)freenet.de
Target Milestone: ---
Classification: Fedora
Hi,
Could you please build perl-Test-WWW-Mechanize-PSGI in EPEL 7 ?
It's in the dependency chain of a package I'd like to build for EPEL 7.
Regards,
Xavier
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1829995
Bug ID: 1829995
Summary: perl-Test-WWW-Mechanize for EL7
Product: Fedora EPEL
Version: epel7
Status: NEW
Component: perl-Test-WWW-Mechanize
Assignee: tremble(a)tremble.org.uk
Reporter: xavier(a)bachelot.org
QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org
CC: jose.p.oliveira.oss(a)gmail.com,
perl-devel(a)lists.fedoraproject.org,
rc040203(a)freenet.de, tremble(a)tremble.org.uk
Target Milestone: ---
Classification: Fedora
Hi,
Could you please build perl-Test-WWW-Mechanize in EPEL 7 ?
It's in the dependency chain of a package I'd like to build for EPEL 7.
Regards,
Xavier
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2037854
Bug ID: 2037854
Summary: Please branch and build perl-Crypt-RC4 for EPEL 9
Product: Fedora EPEL
Version: epel9
Status: NEW
Component: perl-Crypt-RC4
Assignee: ppisar(a)redhat.com
Reporter: paul(a)city-fan.org
QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org
CC: me(a)fale.io, perl-devel(a)lists.fedoraproject.org,
ppisar(a)redhat.com
Target Milestone: ---
Classification: Fedora
Please branch and build perl-Crypt-RC4 for EPEL 9.
If you like you could add me (FAS: pghmcfc) as a committer to the package and
I'll do it myself.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2037854
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2228398
Bug ID: 2228398
Summary: CVE-2023-31486 perl:5.36/perl-HTTP-Tiny: http-tiny:
insecure TLS cert default [fedora-all]
Product: Fedora
Version: 38
Status: NEW
Component: perl-HTTP-Tiny
Keywords: Security, SecurityTracking
Severity: medium
Priority: medium
Assignee: jplesnik(a)redhat.com
Reporter: trathi(a)redhat.com
QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org
CC: jplesnik(a)redhat.com, mspacek(a)redhat.com,
perl-devel(a)lists.fedoraproject.org, ppisar(a)redhat.com
Target Milestone: ---
Classification: Fedora
More information about this security flaw is available in the following bug:
http://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2228392
Disclaimer: Community trackers are created by Red Hat Product Security team on
a best effort basis. Package maintainers are required to ascertain if the flaw
indeed affects their package, before starting the update process.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2228398
Report this comment as SPAM: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla&format=report-sp…
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1821879
Bug ID: 1821879
Summary: CVE-2013-7488 perl-Convert-ASN1: allows remote
attackers to cause an infinite loop via unexpected
input
Product: Security Response
Hardware: All
OS: Linux
Status: NEW
Component: vulnerability
Keywords: Security
Severity: medium
Priority: medium
Assignee: security-response-team(a)redhat.com
Reporter: gsuckevi(a)redhat.com
CC: caillon+fedoraproject(a)gmail.com, caolanm(a)redhat.com,
john.j5live(a)gmail.com, jplesnik(a)redhat.com,
kasal(a)ucw.cz, perl-devel(a)lists.fedoraproject.org,
perl-maint-list(a)redhat.com, ppisar(a)redhat.com,
psabata(a)redhat.com, rhughes(a)redhat.com,
rstrode(a)redhat.com, sandmann(a)redhat.com
Target Milestone: ---
Classification: Other
perl-Convert-ASN1 (aka the Convert::ASN1 module for Perl) through 0.27 allows
remote attackers to cause an infinite loop via unexpected input.
Reference:
https://github.com/gbarr/perl-Convert-ASN1/issues/14
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2188459
Bug ID: 2188459
Summary: CVE-2022-36788 slic3r: Heap-based buffer overflow in
the TriangleMesh clone functionality [fedora-all]
Product: Fedora
Version: 38
Status: NEW
Component: slic3r
Keywords: Security, SecurityTracking
Severity: medium
Priority: medium
Assignee: mhroncok(a)redhat.com
Reporter: psampaio(a)redhat.com
QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org
CC: mhroncok(a)redhat.com,
perl-devel(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
Target Milestone: ---
Classification: Fedora
More information about this security flaw is available in the following bug:
http://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2188458
Disclaimer: Community trackers are created by Red Hat Product Security team on
a best effort basis. Package maintainers are required to ascertain if the flaw
indeed affects their package, before starting the update process.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2188459
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1941155
Bug ID: 1941155
Summary: perl-Crypt-OpenSSL-DSA-0.20 is available
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Status: NEW
Component: perl-Crypt-OpenSSL-DSA
Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged
Assignee: wjhns174(a)hardakers.net
Reporter: upstream-release-monitoring(a)fedoraproject.org
QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org
CC: perl-devel(a)lists.fedoraproject.org,
wjhns174(a)hardakers.net
Target Milestone: ---
Classification: Fedora
Latest upstream release: 0.20
Current version/release in rawhide: 0.19-15.fc34
URL: http://search.cpan.org/dist/Crypt-OpenSSL-DSA/
Please consult the package updates policy before you issue an update to a
stable branch: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/fesco/Updates_Policy/
More information about the service that created this bug can be found at:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Upstream_release_monitoring
Please keep in mind that with any upstream change, there may also be packaging
changes that need to be made. Specifically, please remember that it is your
responsibility to review the new version to ensure that the licensing is still
correct and that no non-free or legally problematic items have been added
upstream.
Based on the information from anitya:
https://release-monitoring.org/project/2745/
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2037658
Bug ID: 2037658
Summary: Please branch and build perl-MouseX-Foreign for EPEL 9
Product: Fedora EPEL
Version: epel9
Status: NEW
Component: perl-MouseX-Foreign
Assignee: emmanuel(a)seyman.fr
Reporter: paul(a)city-fan.org
QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org
CC: emmanuel(a)seyman.fr,
perl-devel(a)lists.fedoraproject.org, ppisar(a)redhat.com
Target Milestone: ---
Classification: Fedora
Could you please branch and build perl-MouseX-Foreign for EPEL 9 ?
If you like you could add me (FAS: pghmcfc) as a committer to the package and
I'll do it myself.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2037658
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2002396
Bug ID: 2002396
Summary: perl-Crypt-OpenSSL-RSA-0.32 is available
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Status: NEW
Component: perl-Crypt-OpenSSL-RSA
Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged
Assignee: wjhns174(a)hardakers.net
Reporter: upstream-release-monitoring(a)fedoraproject.org
QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org
CC: perl-devel(a)lists.fedoraproject.org,
wjhns174(a)hardakers.net
Target Milestone: ---
Classification: Fedora
Latest upstream release: 0.32
Current version/release in rawhide: 0.31-11.fc35
URL: http://search.cpan.org/dist/Crypt-OpenSSL-RSA/
Please consult the package updates policy before you issue an update to a
stable branch: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/fesco/Updates_Policy/
More information about the service that created this bug can be found at:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Upstream_release_monitoring
Please keep in mind that with any upstream change, there may also be packaging
changes that need to be made. Specifically, please remember that it is your
responsibility to review the new version to ensure that the licensing is still
correct and that no non-free or legally problematic items have been added
upstream.
Based on the information from anitya:
https://release-monitoring.org/project/2748/
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2230255
Bug ID: 2230255
Summary: perl-HTTP-Tiny: a ton of new dependencies all of a
sudden?
Product: Fedora
Version: 38
Hardware: All
OS: Linux
Status: NEW
Component: perl-HTTP-Tiny
Assignee: jplesnik(a)redhat.com
Reporter: aros(a)gmx.com
QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org
CC: jplesnik(a)redhat.com, mspacek(a)redhat.com,
perl-devel(a)lists.fedoraproject.org, ppisar(a)redhat.com
Target Milestone: ---
Classification: Fedora
Why does a new version of perl-HTTP-Tiny now depend on a ton of new Perl
subpackages?
Could this please be made optional?
# dnf update perl-HTTP-Tiny
Dependencies resolved.
================================================================================
Package Arch Version Repository Size
================================================================================
Upgrading:
perl-HTTP-Tiny noarch 0.086-2.fc38 updates 55 k
Installing dependencies:
perl-AutoLoader noarch 5.74-497.fc38 updates 22 k
perl-Digest noarch 1.20-490.fc38 fedora 25 k
perl-Digest-MD5 x86_64 2.58-490.fc38 fedora 36 k
perl-IO-Socket-IP noarch 0.41-492.fc38 fedora 41 k
perl-IO-Socket-SSL noarch 2.081-1.fc38 fedora 227 k
perl-Mozilla-CA noarch 20221114-2.fc38 fedora 12 k
perl-Net-SSLeay x86_64 1.92-5.fc38 fedora 361 k
perl-URI noarch 5.17-2.fc38 fedora 120 k
perl-base noarch 2.27-497.fc38 updates 17 k
perl-libnet noarch 3.15-1.fc38 fedora 128 k
Transaction Summary
================================================================================
Install 10 Packages
Upgrade 1 Package
Total download size: 1.0 M
Is this ok [y/N]:
Operation aborted.
This looks totally excessive and unnecessary.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2230255
Report this comment as SPAM: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla&format=report-sp…
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2165567
Bug ID: 2165567
Summary: Upgrade perl-Sub-Exporter-Lexical to 0.100000
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
URL: https://metacpan.org/release/Sub-Exporter-Lexical
Status: NEW
Component: perl-Sub-Exporter-Lexical
Assignee: rc040203(a)freenet.de
Reporter: jplesnik(a)redhat.com
QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org
CC: paul(a)city-fan.org, perl-devel(a)lists.fedoraproject.org,
rc040203(a)freenet.de
Target Milestone: ---
Classification: Fedora
Latest Fedora delivers 0.092292 version. Upstream released 0.100000. When you
have free time, please upgrade it.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2165567
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1716324
Bug ID: 1716324
Summary: perl-Text-Xslate-3.5.6-5.fc30 is not linked to
libperl.so
Product: Fedora
Version: 30
Status: NEW
Component: perl-Text-Xslate
Assignee: jplesnik(a)redhat.com
Reporter: ppisar(a)redhat.com
QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org
CC: i(a)cicku.me, jplesnik(a)redhat.com,
perl-devel(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
Target Milestone: ---
Classification: Fedora
perl-Text-Xslate-3.5.6-5.fc30 lost a dependency on libperl.so since
-Wl,--as-needed was added to distribution-wide linker flags:
$ scanelf -n blib/arch/auto/Text/Xslate/Xslate.so
TYPE NEEDED FILE
ET_DYN libc.so.6 blib/arch/auto/Text/Xslate/Xslate.so
$ ldd -r blib/arch/auto/Text/Xslate/Xslate.so
linux-vdso.so.1 (0x00007fff0d5cb000)
libc.so.6 => /lib64/libc.so.6 (0x00007f948b9a1000)
/lib64/ld-linux-x86-64.so.2 (0x00007f948bb8f000)
undefined symbol: Perl_sv_cmp (blib/arch/auto/Text/Xslate/Xslate.so)
undefined symbol: PL_ppaddr (blib/arch/auto/Text/Xslate/Xslate.so)
[...]
Xslate.so is built like this:
gcc -lpthread -shared -Wl,-z,relro -Wl,--as-needed -Wl,-z,now
-specs=/usr/lib/rpm/redhat/redhat-hardened-ld -L/usr/local/lib
-fstack-protector-strong -lperl -o blib/arch/auto/Text/Xslate/Xslate.so
lib/Text/Xslate.o src/xslate_methods.o
The cause is that -Wl,--as-needed takes effect when library is supplied and
considering only preceding object files and ignoring and following object
files. A correct linker command must list all object files before -l flags.
Like this:
gcc lib/Text/Xslate.o src/xslate_methods.o -lpthread -shared -Wl,-z,relro
-Wl,--as-needed -Wl,-z,now -specs=/usr/lib/rpm/redhat/redhat-hardened-ld
-L/usr/local/lib -fstack-protector-strong -lperl -o
blib/arch/auto/Text/Xslate/Xslate.so
Either there is bug in perl-Text-Xslate build script or in
Module::Build::XSUtil that it uses.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2053941
Bug ID: 2053941
Summary: The Fedora BuildRequires is missing an the license
files are listed as %doc
Product: Fedora
Version: 34
Status: NEW
Component: cpanspec
Assignee: psabata(a)redhat.com
Reporter: bugzilla(a)terrortux.de
QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org
CC: ktdreyer(a)ktdreyer.com,
perl-devel(a)lists.fedoraproject.org,
psabata(a)redhat.com, steve(a)silug.org,
strobert(a)strobe.net
Target Milestone: ---
Classification: Fedora
Description of problem:
In the generated spec file, this line is missing:
# needes by all perl packages
BuildRequires: perl-generators perl-interpreter perl-devel perl
And the license files of the generated spec file are marked as %doc instant of
%license
Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
cpanspec-1.78-39.fc34.noarch
How reproducible:
Every time
Steps to Reproduce:
1. Call cpanspec Sort::Versions for example
Actual results:
See above
Expected results:
Correct spec file
Additional info:
Also the old %setup macro is used.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2053941
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2222637
Bug ID: 2222637
Summary: F39FailsToInstall: perl-Syntax-Feature-Loop
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Status: NEW
Component: perl-Syntax-Feature-Loop
Assignee: jplesnik(a)redhat.com
Reporter: fti-bugs(a)fedoraproject.org
QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org
CC: jplesnik(a)redhat.com,
perl-devel(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
Blocks: 2168845 (F39FailsToInstall,RAWHIDEFailsToInstall)
Target Milestone: ---
Classification: Fedora
Hello,
Please note that this comment was generated automatically by
https://pagure.io/releng/blob/main/f/scripts/ftbfs-fti/follow-policy.py
If you feel that this output has mistakes, please open an issue at
https://pagure.io/releng/
Your package (perl-Syntax-Feature-Loop) Fails To Install in Fedora 39:
can't install perl-Syntax-Feature-Loop:
- nothing provides perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.36.0) needed by
perl-Syntax-Feature-Loop-1.8.0-18.fc38.x86_64
If you know about this problem and are planning on fixing it, please
acknowledge so by setting the bug status to ASSIGNED. If you don't have time to
maintain this package, consider orphaning it, so maintainers of dependent
packages realize the problem.
If you don't react accordingly to the policy for FTBFS/FTI bugs
(https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/fesco/Fails_to_build_from_source_Fails…)
your package may be orphaned in 8+ weeks.
P.S. The data was generated solely from koji buildroot, so it might be newer
than the latest compose or the content on mirrors. To reproduce, use the
koji/local repo only, e.g. in mock:
$ mock -r fedora-39-x86_64 --config-opts mirrored=False install
perl-Syntax-Feature-Loop
P.P.S. If this bug has been reported in the middle of upgrading multiple
dependent packages, please consider using side tags:
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/fesco/Updates_Policy/#updating-inter-d…
Thanks!
Referenced Bugs:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2168845
[Bug 2168845] Fedora 39 Fails To install Tracker
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2222637
Report this comment as SPAM: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla&format=report-sp…
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2175807
Bug ID: 2175807
Summary: perl-Git-Repository-1.325-7.fc39 FTBFS: t/20-simple.t
fails EDITOR tests
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
URL: https://koschei.fedoraproject.org/package/perl-Git-Rep
ository?collection=f39
Status: NEW
Component: perl-Git-Repository
Assignee: jpazdziora(a)redhat.com
Reporter: ppisar(a)redhat.com
QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org
CC: iarnell(a)gmail.com, jpazdziora(a)redhat.com,
perl-devel(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
Blocks: 2168842 (F39FTBFS,RAWHIDEFTBFS)
Target Milestone: ---
Classification: Fedora
perl-Git-Repository-1.325-7.fc39 fails to build in Fedora 39 because
t/20-simple.t test fails:
t/20-simple.t .............. 1/54
# Failed test 'git var GIT_EDITOR'
# at t/20-simple.t line 88.
#
# Failed test 'Git complains about lack of smarts and editor'
# at t/20-simple.t line 89.
#
# ''
# doesn't match '(?^:^fatal: Terminal is dumb, but EDITOR unset )'
#
# Looks like you failed 2 tests of 54.
t/20-simple.t .............. Dubious, test returned 2 (wstat 512, 0x200)
Failed 2/54 subtests
t/21-submodule.t ........... Cloning into '/tmp/TiMR_SSxRH/sub'...
done. at t/21-submodule.t line 46.
A difference between passing and failing build root is at
<https://koschei.fedoraproject.org/build/15041670>. This is probably triggered
by upgrading git from 2.39.2-1.fc39 to 2.40.0-0.1.rc1.fc39.
Referenced Bugs:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2168842
[Bug 2168842] Fedora 39 FTBFS Tracker
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2175807
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2223392
Bug ID: 2223392
Summary: perl-Test-Vars: FTBFS in Fedora Rawhide
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
URL: https://koschei.fedoraproject.org/package/perl-Test-Va
rs
OS: Linux
Status: NEW
Component: perl-Test-Vars
Severity: medium
Assignee: paul(a)city-fan.org
Reporter: jplesnik(a)redhat.com
QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org
CC: paul(a)city-fan.org, perl-devel(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
Target Milestone: ---
Classification: Fedora
Description of problem:
Package perl-Test-Vars fails to build from source in Fedora Rawhide with new
Perl 5.38.
+ ./Build test
# Testing Test::Vars/0.015
t/00_load.t .............. ok
t/01_all_vars_ok_self.t .. ok
# Test::Vars ignores CompileError.pm because: Intentional compile error.
# Test::Vars ignores ImplicitTopic.pm because: Can't use global $_ in "my" at
t/lib/ImplicitTopic.pm line 6, near "my $_ "
t/02_no_warnings.t ....... ok
t/03_warned.t ............ ok
t/04_ignores.t ........... ok
t/05_test_vars.t ......... ok
t/06_vars_ok_self.t ...... ok
# Failed test 'got expected output from test_vars'
# at t/07_stub_sub_bug.t line 25.
# Structures begin differing at:
# $got->[0][2][1][1] = '$x is used once in &StubSub::foo '
# $expected->[0][2][1][1] = '$x is used once in &StubSub::foo at
t/lib/StubSub.pm line 13'
# Looks like you failed 1 test of 2.
t/07_stub_sub_bug.t ......
Dubious, test returned 1 (wstat 256, 0x100)
Failed 1/2 subtests
t/08_undef_aux_list.t .... ok
t/09_array_slice.t ....... ok
t/10_my_sub.t ............ ok
Test Summary Report
-------------------
t/07_stub_sub_bug.t (Wstat: 256 (exited 1) Tests: 2 Failed: 1)
Failed test: 2
Non-zero exit status: 1
Files=11, Tests=71, 1 wallclock secs ( 0.04 usr 0.01 sys + 1.14 cusr 0.31
csys = 1.50 CPU)
Result: FAIL
Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
0.015-9.fc39
Steps to Reproduce:
koji build --scratch f39 perl-Test-Vars-0.015-9.fc39.src.rpm
Additional info:
This package is tracked by Koschei. See:
https://koschei.fedoraproject.org/package/perl-Test-Vars
Reproducible: Always
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2223392
Report this comment as SPAM: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla&format=report-sp…
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2222638
Bug ID: 2222638
Summary: F39FailsToInstall: perl-Tk
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Status: NEW
Component: perl-Tk
Assignee: xavier(a)bachelot.org
Reporter: fti-bugs(a)fedoraproject.org
QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org
CC: andreas.bierfert(a)lowlatency.de,
perl-devel(a)lists.fedoraproject.org,
xavier(a)bachelot.org
Blocks: 2168845 (F39FailsToInstall,RAWHIDEFailsToInstall)
Target Milestone: ---
Classification: Fedora
Hello,
Please note that this comment was generated automatically by
https://pagure.io/releng/blob/main/f/scripts/ftbfs-fti/follow-policy.py
If you feel that this output has mistakes, please open an issue at
https://pagure.io/releng/
Your package (perl-Tk) Fails To Install in Fedora 39:
can't install perl-Tk:
- nothing provides libperl.so.5.36()(64bit) needed by
perl-Tk-804.036-9.fc39.x86_64
- nothing provides perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.36.0) needed by
perl-Tk-804.036-9.fc39.x86_64
If you know about this problem and are planning on fixing it, please
acknowledge so by setting the bug status to ASSIGNED. If you don't have time to
maintain this package, consider orphaning it, so maintainers of dependent
packages realize the problem.
If you don't react accordingly to the policy for FTBFS/FTI bugs
(https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/fesco/Fails_to_build_from_source_Fails…)
your package may be orphaned in 8+ weeks.
P.S. The data was generated solely from koji buildroot, so it might be newer
than the latest compose or the content on mirrors. To reproduce, use the
koji/local repo only, e.g. in mock:
$ mock -r fedora-39-x86_64 --config-opts mirrored=False install perl-Tk
P.P.S. If this bug has been reported in the middle of upgrading multiple
dependent packages, please consider using side tags:
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/fesco/Updates_Policy/#updating-inter-d…
Thanks!
Referenced Bugs:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2168845
[Bug 2168845] Fedora 39 Fails To install Tracker
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2222638
Report this comment as SPAM: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla&format=report-sp…
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2181971
Bug ID: 2181971
Summary: perl-Glib-Object-Introspection-0.050 is available
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Status: NEW
Component: perl-Glib-Object-Introspection
Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged
Assignee: berrange(a)redhat.com
Reporter: upstream-release-monitoring(a)fedoraproject.org
QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org
CC: berrange(a)redhat.com,
perl-devel(a)lists.fedoraproject.org, sergio(a)serjux.com
Target Milestone: ---
Classification: Fedora
Releases retrieved: 0.050
Upstream release that is considered latest: 0.050
Current version/release in rawhide: 0.049-11.fc38
URL: http://search.cpan.org/dist/Glib-Object-Introspection/
Please consult the package updates policy before you issue an update to a
stable branch: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/fesco/Updates_Policy/
More information about the service that created this bug can be found at:
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/package-maintainers/Upstream_Release_M…
Please keep in mind that with any upstream change, there may also be packaging
changes that need to be made. Specifically, please remember that it is your
responsibility to review the new version to ensure that the licensing is still
correct and that no non-free or legally problematic items have been added
upstream.
Based on the information from Anitya:
https://release-monitoring.org/project/2924/
To change the monitoring settings for the project, please visit:
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/perl-Glib-Object-Introspection
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2181971
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1936241
Bug ID: 1936241
Summary: Compiled @INC in 5.32 No longer Includes Suitable Path
For Custom System-Wide Modules
Product: Fedora
Version: 33
Hardware: All
OS: Linux
Status: NEW
Component: perl
Severity: medium
Assignee: jplesnik(a)redhat.com
Reporter: claywj(a)gmail.com
QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org
CC: caillon+fedoraproject(a)gmail.com, iarnell(a)gmail.com,
jplesnik(a)redhat.com, kasal(a)ucw.cz,
mmaslano(a)redhat.com,
perl-devel(a)lists.fedoraproject.org, ppisar(a)redhat.com,
psabata(a)redhat.com, rhughes(a)redhat.com,
sandmann(a)redhat.com, spotrh(a)gmail.com
Target Milestone: ---
Classification: Fedora
Description of problem:
Removing /usr/local/share/perl5 for the version specific dir with 5.32 from the
compiled @INC makes it difficult to maintain custom system wide modules apart
from the standard rpm/CPAN locations when upgrading.
As this is done during build, is it possible to get it added back in the next
version?
Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
5.32
How reproducible:
perl -e 'print "@INC\n"'
Steps to Reproduce:
1. Using CVS/SCM software to update a custom module, it goes to the expected
old location no longer part of @INC and the changes are not seen.
Actual results:
See above
Expected results:
The path would remain and the changes seen
Additional info:
Yes, CVS/SCM can be changed but in this case the update came across on "Thu 25
Feb 2021 04:46:53 PM CST" during updates. The installer did relocate the
existing custom modules to ./5.32 but the change was not noticed until an
update to one of the custom modules took place
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1731721
Bug ID: 1731721
Summary: perl-Font-AFM depends on files/directories from
non-standard locations
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Status: NEW
Component: perl-Font-AFM
Assignee: rc040203(a)freenet.de
Reporter: i.gnatenko.brain(a)gmail.com
QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org
CC: lxtnow(a)gmail.com, perl-devel(a)lists.fedoraproject.org,
rc040203(a)freenet.de, rob.myers(a)gtri.gatech.edu,
tcallawa(a)redhat.com, tremble(a)tremble.org.uk
Blocks: 1731683
Target Milestone: ---
Classification: Fedora
Hello,
Fedora Packaging Guidelines allow dependencies only on files/directories from
/usr/bin, /usr/sbin and /etc directories[0].
Your package depends on files/directories outside of those. See below for more
information about package/dependencies.
---
perl-Font-AFM-1.20-30.fc31.src:
- /usr/share/a2ps/afm/phvr.afm
---
Please correct those or provide reason why is it correct.
It is very important to not download huge filelists.xml just because few
packages in distribution depend on non-standard paths.
Thanks for cooperation!
[0]
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/packaging-guidelines/#_file_and_direct…
Referenced Bugs:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1731683
[Bug 1731683] Packages which are not following Packaging Guidelines
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1731700
Bug ID: 1731700
Summary: rt depends on files/directories from non-standard
locations
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Status: NEW
Component: rt
Assignee: rc040203(a)freenet.de
Reporter: i.gnatenko.brain(a)gmail.com
QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org
CC: perl-devel(a)lists.fedoraproject.org,
rc040203(a)freenet.de, tibbs(a)math.uh.edu
Blocks: 1731683
Target Milestone: ---
Classification: Fedora
Hello,
Fedora Packaging Guidelines allow dependencies only on files/directories from
/usr/bin, /usr/sbin and /etc directories[0].
Your package depends on files/directories outside of those. See below for more
information about package/dependencies.
---
rt-4.4.4-2.fc31.noarch:
- /usr/share/fonts/google-droid/DroidSansFallback.ttf
- /usr/share/fonts/google-droid/DroidSans.ttf
rt-4.4.4-2.fc31.src:
- /usr/share/fonts/google-droid/DroidSansFallback.ttf
- /usr/share/fonts/google-droid/DroidSans.ttf
---
Please correct those or provide reason why is it correct.
It is very important to not download huge filelists.xml just because few
packages in distribution depend on non-standard paths.
Thanks for cooperation!
[0]
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/packaging-guidelines/#_file_and_direct…
Referenced Bugs:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1731683
[Bug 1731683] Packages which are not following Packaging Guidelines
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1731718
Bug ID: 1731718
Summary: perl-Convert-Color depends on files/directories from
non-standard locations
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Status: NEW
Component: perl-Convert-Color
Assignee: rc040203(a)freenet.de
Reporter: i.gnatenko.brain(a)gmail.com
QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org
CC: perl-devel(a)lists.fedoraproject.org,
rc040203(a)freenet.de
Blocks: 1731683
Target Milestone: ---
Classification: Fedora
Hello,
Fedora Packaging Guidelines allow dependencies only on files/directories from
/usr/bin, /usr/sbin and /etc directories[0].
Your package depends on files/directories outside of those. See below for more
information about package/dependencies.
---
perl-Convert-Color-0.11-16.fc31.src:
- /usr/share/X11/rgb.txt
---
Please correct those or provide reason why is it correct.
It is very important to not download huge filelists.xml just because few
packages in distribution depend on non-standard paths.
Thanks for cooperation!
[0]
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/packaging-guidelines/#_file_and_direct…
Referenced Bugs:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1731683
[Bug 1731683] Packages which are not following Packaging Guidelines
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2184280
Bug ID: 2184280
Summary: Please upgrade perl-Lexical-Var to >= 0.010
Product: Fedora
Version: 38
Status: NEW
Component: perl-Lexical-Var
Assignee: jplesnik(a)redhat.com
Reporter: rc040203(a)freenet.de
QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org
CC: jplesnik(a)redhat.com, paul(a)city-fan.org,
perl-devel(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
Target Milestone: ---
Classification: Fedora
Description of problem:
Please upgrade perl-Lexical-Var to >= 0.010 on all Fedora releases < 39.
perl-Lexical-Var >= 0.10 is required by perl-Sub-Exporter-Lexical-1.000
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2184280
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2246934
Bug ID: 2246934
Summary: perl-Mail-Box-3.010-1.fc40 FTBFS with
perl-Mail-Message-3.014: t/505parser-bodymp.t tests
fails
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
URL: https://koschei.fedoraproject.org/package/perl-Mail-Bo
x?collection=f40
Status: NEW
Component: perl-Mail-Box
Assignee: spotrh(a)gmail.com
Reporter: ppisar(a)redhat.com
QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org
CC: perl-devel(a)lists.fedoraproject.org, sergio(a)serjux.com,
spotrh(a)gmail.com
Blocks: 2231791 (F40FTBFS,RAWHIDEFTBFS)
Target Milestone: ---
Link ID: CPAN 150141
Classification: Fedora
perl-Mail-Box-3.010-1.fc40 fails to build in Fedora 40 because a test fails:
t/504parser-bodyd.t ...... ok
# Failed test '1 lines 0'
# at t/505parser-bodymp.t line 68.
# got: 22
# expected: 21
# Failed test '1 lines 1'
# at t/505parser-bodymp.t line 68.
# got: 83
# expected: 82
# Failed test '1 lines 2'
# at t/505parser-bodymp.t line 68.
# got: 35
# expected: 34
# Looks like you failed 3 tests of 313.
t/505parser-bodymp.t .....
Dubious, test returned 3 (wstat 768, 0x300)
Failed 3/313 subtests
This is triggered by upgrading perl-Mail-Message from 3.013-2.fc39 to
3.014-1.fc40.
Referenced Bugs:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2231791
[Bug 2231791] Fedora 40 FTBFS Tracker
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2246934
Report this comment as SPAM: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla&format=report-sp…
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2161639
Bug ID: 2161639
Summary: Pregenerated File-RsyncP-0.76/FileList/configure is
missing a source
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Status: NEW
Component: perl-File-RsyncP
Assignee: jplesnik(a)redhat.com
Reporter: ppisar(a)redhat.com
QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org
CC: imlinux+fedora(a)gmail.com, jplesnik(a)redhat.com,
perl-devel(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
Target Milestone: ---
Link ID: Red Hat Bugzilla 199647
Classification: Fedora
perl-File-RsyncP-0.76-10.fc38 source package delivers
File-RsyncP-0.76/FileList/configure file which itsels was generated with
Autoconf, but the original source for Autoconf tool (configure.in according to
File-RsyncP-0.76/FileList/Makefile.PL is missing from the source archive and
thus from the source package.
While the file is licensed as FSFULL which does not require distributing
sources, it is deemed to be against Fedora spirit (and Packaging guidelines?)
<https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/packaging@lists.fedoraproject…>.
We should either reimplement configure.in or remove this package from a
distribution.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2161639
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2215065
Bug ID: 2215065
Summary: perl-Coro doesn't exist in EPEL 9 and FTBFS when I'm
trying to build it
Product: Fedora EPEL
Version: epel9
Hardware: All
OS: Linux
Status: NEW
Component: perl-Coro
Assignee: emmanuel(a)seyman.fr
Reporter: yaroslav(a)fedevych.name
QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org
CC: emmanuel(a)seyman.fr, mspacek(a)redhat.com,
perl-devel(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
Target Milestone: ---
Classification: Fedora
Description of problem:
I'm trying to build the perl-Coro package for EPEL 9 in my COPR; apart from
missing a dependency (which can be provided easily enough), it fails its own
tests in Coro::Event by blocking forever in Event/t/01_unblock.t, which I've
able to track down to a do_timer() -> Coro::schedule call, inside of which it's
just sitting there forever in pselect() call that keeps timing out with no
events, as strace shows.
When I skip only the Coro::Event-specific problematic tests, all other tests
pass.
This is only happening in the EL9 environment. Using mock on a Fedora 38 host,
the same machine builds the exact same source package just fine on el8, f38,
and f39 with all tests passing, but freezes invariably on el9.
My COPR (jafd/perl-modules) logs show that it freezes in the same place
independently of architecture, as I build there for aarch64 and x86_64, thus
pointing at some kind of EL9-specific userspace problem.
(https://download.copr.fedorainfracloud.org/results/jafd/perl-modules/epel-9…)
I'm wondering if it's something the maintainers have run into already and thus
stopped building perl-Coro for EPEL 9. I'd like to help however I can to fix
this — if I knew how.
I've tried downgrading perl-Event to 1.27, the same version EL8 has, and it
doesn't help.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2215065
Report this comment as SPAM: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla&format=report-sp…
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2208967
Bug ID: 2208967
Summary: perl-GnuPG-Interface-1.02-7.fc39 FTBFS: tests fail
with gnupg2-2.4.1
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
URL: https://koschei.fedoraproject.org/package/perl-GnuPG-I
nterface
OS: Linux
Status: NEW
Component: perl-GnuPG-Interface
Severity: medium
Assignee: emmanuel(a)seyman.fr
Reporter: ppisar(a)redhat.com
QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org
CC: emmanuel(a)seyman.fr, fedora(a)mj41.cz,
perl-devel(a)lists.fedoraproject.org,
xavier(a)bachelot.org
Target Milestone: ---
Classification: Fedora
perl-GnuPG-Interface-1.02-7.fc39 fails to build in Fedora 39 because tests
fail:
t/Fingerprint.t ............ ok
t/get_public_keys.t ........
Failed 2/3 subtests
t/get_secret_keys.t ........
Failed 1/2 subtests
t/import_keys.t ............ ok
t/Interface.t .............. ok
t/list_public_keys.t ....... ok
t/list_secret_keys.t .......
Failed 1/4 subtests
t/list_sigs.t .............. ok
t/passphrase_handling.t .... ok
t/sign.t ................... ok
t/sign_and_encrypt.t ....... ok
t/UserId.t ................. ok
t/verify.t ................. ok
t/version_updates.t ........ ok
t/wrap_call.t .............. ok
t/z_delete_keys.t .......... ok
t/zzz_cleanup.t ............ ok
Test Summary Report
-------------------
t/get_public_keys.t (Wstat: 0 Tests: 3 Failed: 2)
Failed tests: 2-3
t/get_secret_keys.t (Wstat: 0 Tests: 2 Failed: 1)
Failed test: 2
t/list_secret_keys.t (Wstat: 0 Tests: 4 Failed: 1)
Failed test: 2
Files=24, Tests=62, 11 wallclock secs ( 0.08 usr 0.04 sys + 6.65 cusr 1.91
csys = 8.68 CPU)
Result: FAIL
gpg-connect-agent: no running gpg-agent - starting '/usr/bin/gpg-agent'
gpg-connect-agent: waiting for the agent to come up ... (5s)
gpg-connect-agent: connection to the agent established
gpg-agent[303]: gpg-agent running and available
subkeys fail comparison; this is a known issue with GnuPG 1.0.1 at
t/get_public_keys.t line 212.
gpg: using "0x93AFC4B1B0288A104996B44253AE596EF950DA9C" as default secret key
for signing
Failed 3/24 test programs. 4/62 subtests failed.
make: *** [Makefile:801: test_dynamic] Error 255
error: Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.TEALvJ (%check)
A difference between passing and failing build root is at
<https://koschei.fedoraproject.org/build/15468273>. An upgrade of gnupg2 from
2.4.0-3.fc39 to 2.4.1-1.fc39 is suspicious.
Reproducible: Always
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2208967
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2243747
Bug ID: 2243747
Summary: Please branch and build perl-XML-RSS for EPEL9
Product: Fedora EPEL
Version: epel9
Status: NEW
Component: perl-XML-RSS
Assignee: spotrh(a)gmail.com
Reporter: orion(a)nwra.com
QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org
CC: perl-devel(a)lists.fedoraproject.org, spotrh(a)gmail.com
Target Milestone: ---
Classification: Fedora
Please branch and build perl-XML-RSS in epel9.
If you do not wish to maintain perl-XML-RSS in epel9,
or do not think you will be able to do this in a timely manner,
the EPEL Packagers SIG would be happy to be a co-maintainer of the package;
please add the epel-packagers-sig group through
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/perl-XML-RSS/addgroup
and grant it commit access, or collaborator access on epel* branches.
I would also be happy to be a co-maintainer (FAS: orion).
I can be the primary contact for EPEL (FAS: orion).
It currently builds and installs on EPEL9
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2243747
Report this comment as SPAM: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla&format=report-sp…
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2154738
Bug ID: 2154738
Summary: [abrt] slic3r: stl_add_facet(): perl killed by SIGABRT
Product: Fedora
Version: 37
Hardware: x86_64
Status: NEW
Whiteboard: abrt_hash:67e6509db17b71dbc3796572867dda4c31f0e967;
Component: slic3r
Assignee: mhroncok(a)redhat.com
Reporter: ol+redhat(a)infoserver.lv
QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org
CC: mhroncok(a)redhat.com,
perl-devel(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
Target Milestone: ---
Classification: Fedora
Description of problem:
Trying to slice EF_Front_v3.stl file from
https://www.thingiverse.com/thing:4785984
Version-Release number of selected component:
slic3r-1.3.0-27.fc37
Additional info:
reporter: libreport-2.17.4
backtrace_rating: 4
cgroup:
0::/user.slice/user-1364.slice/user@1364.service/app.slice/app-slic3r-3121d84c542244a3ae9cc91a239ca22a.scope
cmdline: /usr/bin/perl /usr/bin/slic3r
crash_function: stl_add_facet
executable: /usr/bin/perl
journald_cursor:
s=1507985f41d24fd8998d78c5690bc8f4;i=1ec6854;b=ee556b81838a4b7dbed054a383432cc5;m=3716e063;t=5f02544515059;x=a43591764f8f71fd
kernel: 6.0.12-300.fc37.x86_64
rootdir: /
runlevel: N 5
type: CCpp
uid: 1364
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2154738
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2074940
Bug ID: 2074940
Summary: Remove usage of gethostbyname() and inet_addr() from
perl-FCGI package
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Status: NEW
Component: perl-FCGI
Assignee: emmanuel(a)seyman.fr
Reporter: mspacek(a)redhat.com
QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org
CC: bstinson(a)redhat.com, emmanuel(a)seyman.fr,
iarnell(a)gmail.com, jwboyer(a)redhat.com,
mspacek(a)redhat.com,
perl-devel(a)lists.fedoraproject.org,
perl-maint-list(a)redhat.com,
rhel-cs-apps-subsystem-qe(a)redhat.com
Depends On: 1979848
Target Milestone: ---
Classification: Fedora
+++ This bug was initially created as a clone of Bug #1979848 +++
Description of problem:
rpminspect is failing in gating
Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
perl-FCGI-0.79-7.el9
Actual results:
Forbidden function symbols found:
gethostbyname
inet_addr
Expected results:
no forbidden functions
Referenced Bugs:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1979848
[Bug 1979848] Remove usage of gethostbyname() and inet_addr() from perl-FCGI
package
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2074940
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2063919
Bug ID: 2063919
Summary: Packages Perl tests should not generate Provides
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Status: NEW
Component: perl-generators
Assignee: jplesnik(a)redhat.com
Reporter: ppisar(a)redhat.com
QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org
CC: jplesnik(a)redhat.com, mspacek(a)redhat.com,
perl-devel(a)lists.fedoraproject.org, ppisar(a)redhat.com
Target Milestone: ---
Classification: Fedora
I noticed that packaged tests in /usr/libexec/... generates Provides because
they are matched by perllib.attr:
$ cat /usr/lib/rpm/fileattrs/perllib.attr
%__perllib_provides %{_rpmconfigdir}/perl.prov
%__perllib_requires %{_rpmconfigdir}/perl.req
%__perllib_magic ^Perl[[:digit:]] module source.*
%__perllib_path \\.pm$
%__perllib_flags magic_and_path
I think they were meant to be only covered with perltest.attr:
# cat /usr/lib/rpm/fileattrs/perltest.attr
%__perltest_requires %{_rpmconfigdir}/perl.req
%__perltest_magic ^.*[Pp]erl[[:digit:]]* .*$
%__perltest_path /usr/libexec/.*\\.(pl|pm|t)$
%__perltest_flags magic_and_path
But perltest.attr is more similar to perl.attr, it's about scripts:
$ cat /usr/lib/rpm/fileattrs/perl.attr
%__perl_requires %{_rpmconfigdir}/perl.req
%__perl_magic ^.*[Pp]erl .*$
%__perl_flags exeonly
Would it be possible to change perllib.attr to match only files under
/usr/{share,lib,lib64}/perl?
Observed with perl-generators-1.13-5.fc36.noarch.
(I find out that filtering those Provides with %__exclude_provides is a problem
when the tests involve symlinks to modules in the main package. See
perl-Module-Install-TestBase-tests-0.86-24.fc36 which erroneously provides
perl(Module::Install::TestBase)
<https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=1892296>. I will try to
work it around on packaged file level in perl-Module-Install-TestBase.)
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2063919
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2212317
Bug ID: 2212317
Summary: IPv6 is not working
Product: Fedora
Version: 37
OS: Linux
Status: NEW
Component: perl-SNMP_Session
Severity: medium
Assignee: spotrh(a)gmail.com
Reporter: mspacek(a)redhat.com
QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org
CC: perl-devel(a)lists.fedoraproject.org, spotrh(a)gmail.com
Target Milestone: ---
Classification: Fedora
SNMP_Session Perl library has issue in usage of IPv6.
Fix is in
https://github.com/sleinen/snmp-session/pull/15/commits/599378943bf3cac92fd…
Reproducible: Always
Steps to Reproduce:
1. Set SNMP with IPv6 only (agentaddress [::1] in /etc/snmp/snmpd.conf)
2. Run the example in the attachment with: ./test.pl '[::1]' and check result.
Actual Results:
Error:
can't resolve "[::1]" to IP address
at ./test.pl line 19.
Couldn't open SNMP session to [::1]:161. at /__PATH_TO_TEST__/test.pl line 20.
Expected Results:
Something like:
1.3.6.1.2.1.1.1.0 => Linux man 6.2.15-300.fc38.x86_64 #1 SMP PREEMPT_DYNAMIC
Thu May 11 17:37:39 UTC 2023 x86_64
1.3.6.1.2.1.1.4.0 => Root <root@localhost> (configure
/etc/snmp/snmp.local.conf)
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2212317
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1666098
Bug ID: 1666098
Summary: Overspecification in perl -MExtUtils::Embed -e ldopts
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Status: NEW
Component: perl
Assignee: jplesnik(a)redhat.com
Reporter: bugs.michael(a)gmx.net
QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org
CC: caillon+fedoraproject(a)gmail.com, iarnell(a)gmail.com,
jplesnik(a)redhat.com, kasal(a)ucw.cz,
mbarnes(a)fastmail.com, mmaslano(a)redhat.com,
perl-devel(a)lists.fedoraproject.org, ppisar(a)redhat.com,
psabata(a)redhat.com, rhughes(a)redhat.com,
sandmann(a)redhat.com, tcallawa(a)redhat.com
Target Milestone: ---
Classification: Fedora
The following command is supposed to return the ldflags that are needed to link
with libperl. Instead, it returns everything that has been specified when
building libperl itself. Not limited to Fedora's global flags and several
libraries that aren't needed when linking shared. As a result, programs relink
also with those libs instead of just libperl.
$ perl -MExtUtils::Embed -e ldopts
-Wl,--enable-new-dtags -Wl,-z,relro -Wl,-z,now
-specs=/usr/lib/rpm/redhat/redhat-hardened-ld -Wl,-z,relro -Wl,-z,now
-specs=/usr/lib/rpm/redhat/redhat-hardened-ld -fstack-protector-strong
-L/usr/local/lib -L/usr/lib64/perl5/CORE -lperl -lpthread -lresolv -ldl -lm
-lcrypt -lutil -lc
Please clean up the flags and return only -L/usr/lib64/perl5/CORE -lperl.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2246773
Bug ID: 2246773
Summary: perl-Devel-Cover needs to be synchronised to perl
version currently installed
Product: Fedora
Version: 38
Hardware: x86_64
OS: Linux
Status: NEW
Component: perl-Devel-Cover
Keywords: Upgrades
Severity: medium
Assignee: spotrh(a)gmail.com
Reporter: rwfranks(a)acm.org
QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org
CC: perl-devel(a)lists.fedoraproject.org, spotrh(a)gmail.com
Target Milestone: ---
Classification: Fedora
Perl test programs using Devel::Cover emit a warning when running on the
"wrong" version of perl.
This happens for each and every test script.
A package dependency needs to be added to force a rebuild of perl-Devel-Cover
whenever the perl interpreter is updated.
Reproducible: Always
Steps to Reproduce:
1.
tar xvzf Net-DNS-1.40.tar.gz
2.
perl Makefile.PL
3.
make test_cover
Actual Results:
PERL_DL_NONLAZY=1 HARNESS_OPTIONS=j1:c "/usr/bin/perl" "-It"
"-MExtUtils::Command::MM" "-MTest::Harness" "-e" "undef
*Test::Harness::Switches; test_harness(0, 'blib/lib', 'blib/arch')" t/*.t
t/00-install.t .............
This version of Devel::Cover was built with Perl version 5.036000.
It is now being run with Perl version 5.036001.
Attempting to make adjustments, but you may find that some of your modules do
not have coverage data collected. You may need to alter the +-inc, +-ignore
and +-select options.
t/00-install.t ............. 1/210 #
# Filename not in MANIFEST: lib/Net/DNS/RR/DLV.pm
t/00-install.t ............. ok
t/00-load.t ................
This version of Devel::Cover was built with Perl version 5.036000.
It is now being run with Perl version 5.036001.
Attempting to make adjustments, but you may find that some of your modules do
not have coverage data collected. You may need to alter the +-inc, +-ignore
and +-select options.
...
Expected Results:
PERL_DL_NONLAZY=1 HARNESS_OPTIONS=j1:c "/usr/bin/perl" "-It"
"-MExtUtils::Command::MM" "-MTest::Harness" "-e" "undef
*Test::Harness::Switches; test_harness(0, 'blib/lib', 'blib/arch')" t/*.t
t/00-install.t ............. ok
t/00-load.t ................ #
# These tests were run using:
# Net::DNS 1.40
...
In this particular case there seem to be no ill effects, but there have been
occasions in the past where the version mismatch has rendered Devel::Cover
unusable.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2246773
Report this comment as SPAM: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla&format=report-sp…
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2030311
Bug ID: 2030311
Summary: Please branch and build perl-Authen-Krb5 in epel9
Product: Fedora EPEL
Version: epel9
Status: NEW
Component: perl-Authen-Krb5
Assignee: simon(a)sxw.org.uk
Reporter: alex.iribarren(a)cern.ch
QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org
CC: perl-devel(a)lists.fedoraproject.org, simon(a)sxw.org.uk
Target Milestone: ---
Classification: Fedora
Description of problem:
Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
How reproducible:
Steps to Reproduce:
1.
2.
3.
Actual results:
Expected results:
Additional info:
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2030311
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2243201
Bug ID: 2243201
Summary: perl-CGI-Application-Plugin-Session-1.05-27.fc40 FTBFS
with CGI-4.59: Failed test 'Expiry should not change'
at t/06_expiry.t line 69
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
URL: https://koschei.fedoraproject.org/package/perl-CGI-App
lication-Plugin-Session
Status: NEW
Component: perl-CGI-Application-Plugin-Session
Assignee: emmanuel(a)seyman.fr
Reporter: ppisar(a)redhat.com
QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org
CC: emmanuel(a)seyman.fr, perl-devel(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
Blocks: 2231791 (F40FTBFS,RAWHIDEFTBFS)
Target Milestone: ---
Classification: Fedora
perl-CGI-Application-Plugin-Session-1.05-27.fc40 fails to build in Fedora 40
because a test fails:
# Failed test 'Expiry should not change'
# at t/06_expiry.t line 69.
# got: undef
# expected: '-1'
# Looks like you failed 1 test of 16.
t/06_expiry.t .............
Dubious, test returned 1 (wstat 256, 0x100)
Failed 1/16 subtests
A difference between passing and failting build root is at
<https://koschei.fedoraproject.org/build/16455735>. This failure is triggered
by upgrading perl-CGI from 0:4.57-2.fc39 to 0:4.59-1.fc40.
Referenced Bugs:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2231791
[Bug 2231791] Fedora 40 FTBFS Tracker
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2243201
Report this comment as SPAM: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla&format=report-sp…
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2243614
Bug ID: 2243614
Summary: perl-Class-Date-1.1.17-17.fc40 FTBFS: t/50_timezone.t
fails without tzdata package
Product: Fedora
Version: 39
URL: https://koschei.fedoraproject.org/package/perl-Class-D
ate?collection=f40
Status: NEW
Component: perl-Class-Date
Assignee: osspkg(a)gmail.com
Reporter: ppisar(a)redhat.com
QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org
CC: osspkg(a)gmail.com, perl-devel(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
Blocks: 2168842 (F39FTBFS), 2231791 (F40FTBFS,RAWHIDEFTBFS)
Target Milestone: ---
Classification: Fedora
perl-Class-Date-1.1.17-17.fc40 fails to build in Fedora 40 because a test
fails:
# Env::C version 0.15 loaded
# Failed test 'tzdst'
# at t/50_timezone.t line 18.
# got: 'CET'
# expected: 'CEST'
# Failed test 'epoch'
# at t/50_timezone.t line 19.
# got: '1020470462'
# expected: '1020463262'
# Failed test 'date2'
# at t/50_timezone.t line 23.
# got: '2002-05-04 00:01:02'
# expected: '2002-05-03 22:01:02'
# Failed test 'epoch'
# at t/50_timezone.t line 29.
# got: '1020470462'
# expected: '1020463262'
# Looks like you failed 2 tests of 4.
# Failed test 'to GMT'
# at t/50_timezone.t line 30.
# Looks like you failed 3 tests of 8.
t/50_timezone.t .........
Dubious, test returned 3 (wstat 768, 0x300)
Failed 3/8 subtests
This is triggered by a removal of tzdata from a minimal build root.
The same problem exists in Fedora 39.
Referenced Bugs:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2168842
[Bug 2168842] Fedora 39 FTBFS Tracker
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2231791
[Bug 2231791] Fedora 40 FTBFS Tracker
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2243614
Report this comment as SPAM: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla&format=report-sp…
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2243745
Bug ID: 2243745
Summary: Please branch and build perl-Data-Report for EPEL 9
Product: Fedora EPEL
Version: epel9
Status: NEW
Component: perl-Data-Report
Assignee: jvromans(a)squirrel.nl
Reporter: orion(a)nwra.com
QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org
CC: jvromans(a)squirrel.nl, mi(a)v3.sk, orion(a)nwra.com,
perl-devel(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
Target Milestone: ---
Classification: Fedora
I would do this myself, but I only have commit privileges on the package. I
need admin or collaborator/epel to be able request the epel9 branch. Thanks.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2243745
Report this comment as SPAM: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla&format=report-sp…
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2245689
Bug ID: 2245689
Summary: perl-WWW-Curl core dumps perl if use of setopt
CURLOPT_RESOLV
Product: Fedora EPEL
Version: epel9
Hardware: All
OS: Linux
Status: NEW
Component: perl-WWW-Curl
Severity: medium
Assignee: emmanuel(a)seyman.fr
Reporter: agibson2(a)gmail.com
QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org
CC: emmanuel(a)seyman.fr, mspacek(a)redhat.com,
perl-devel(a)lists.fedoraproject.org,
xavier(a)bachelot.org
Target Milestone: ---
Classification: Fedora
Description of problem:
If you try to use the setopt(CURLOPT_RESOLV, ...) option, perl core dumps.
This was tracked down awhile but seems to not be fixed upstream. A previous
commit in the upstream source for version 4.17 added #ifdef in Curl.xs for
building CURLOPT_RESOLV support but the ifdef for CURLOPT_RESOLV is always
false because CURLOPT_RESOLV is an enum and not a define.
Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
How reproducible:
Every time
Steps to Reproduce:
1. Install perl-WWW-Curl
1. Create program that uses WWW::Curl::Easy and does a setopt OPTCURL_RESOLV.
Perl immediately crashes when it hits that line.
An example simple source program and an explenation of the problem is
below...
https://github.com/szbalint/WWW--Curl/issues/9
Additional info:
To fix it, removing the #ifdef for CURLOPT_RESOLV in the Curl.xs allows it to
be compiled into perl-WWW-Curl.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2245689
Report this comment as SPAM: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla&format=report-sp…
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2242157
Bug ID: 2242157
Summary: perl-Math-Random-Secure for EL9 and EL7
Product: Fedora EPEL
Version: epel9
Status: NEW
Component: perl-Math-Random-Secure
Assignee: emmanuel(a)seyman.fr
Reporter: xavier(a)bachelot.org
CC: emmanuel(a)seyman.fr, perl-devel(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
Target Milestone: ---
Classification: Fedora
Hi,
Could you please build perl-Math-Random-Secure for both EL7 and EL9 ?
I can take care of it by myself if you add me to the package. My FAS is
xavierb.
Regards,
Xavier
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2242157
Report this comment as SPAM: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla&format=report-sp…
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2240584
Bug ID: 2240584
Summary: perl-Time-ParseDate-2015.103-24.fc40 FTBFS: tests fail
without tzdata package
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
URL: https://koschei.fedoraproject.org/package/perl-Time-Pa
rseDate?collection=f39
Status: NEW
Component: perl-Time-ParseDate
Assignee: denis(a)fateyev.com
Reporter: ppisar(a)redhat.com
QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org
CC: denis(a)fateyev.com, perl-devel(a)lists.fedoraproject.org,
xavier(a)bachelot.org
Blocks: 2168842 (F39FTBFS), 2231791 (F40FTBFS,RAWHIDEFTBFS)
Target Milestone: ---
Classification: Fedora
perl-Time-ParseDate-2015.103-24.fc40 fails to build in Fedora 40 and 39 because
tests fail if tzdata package is not installed:
t/metdate.t ... skipped: It seems localtime() does not honor $ENV{TZ} when set
in the test script.
t/order1.t .... 1/?
# Failed test 'Europe/Moscow, DST permanent 2009'
# at t/order1.t line 33.
# got: '1257033600'
# expected: '1257022800'
# Failed test 'Europe/Moscow, DST permanent 2013'
# at t/order1.t line 34.
# got: '1369872000'
# expected: '1369857600'
# Looks like you failed 2 tests of 5.
t/order1.t .... Dubious, test returned 2 (wstat 512, 0x200)
Failed 2/5 subtests
t/order2.t .... 1/?
# Failed test 'Europe/Moscow, DST permanent 2013'
# at t/order2.t line 31.
# got: '1369872000'
# expected: '1369857600'
# Failed test 'Europe/Moscow, DST permanent 2009'
# at t/order2.t line 32.
# got: '1257033600'
# expected: '1257022800'
# Looks like you failed 2 tests of 5.
t/order2.t .... Dubious, test returned 2 (wstat 512, 0x200)
Failed 2/5 subtests
A difference between passing and failing build roots is at
<https://koschei.fedoraproject.org/build/16391565>.
Referenced Bugs:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2168842
[Bug 2168842] Fedora 39 FTBFS Tracker
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2231791
[Bug 2231791] Fedora 40 FTBFS Tracker
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2240584
Report this comment as SPAM: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla&format=report-sp…
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2240458
Bug ID: 2240458
Summary: Perl 5.38 breaks Irssi locale
Product: Fedora
Version: 39
Hardware: x86_64
URL: https://github.com/irssi/scripts.irssi.org/issues/857
OS: Linux
Status: NEW
Component: perl
Severity: medium
Assignee: jplesnik(a)redhat.com
Reporter: mjuszkie(a)redhat.com
QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org
CC: iarnell(a)gmail.com, jplesnik(a)redhat.com, kasal(a)ucw.cz,
mmaslano(a)redhat.com, mspacek(a)redhat.com,
perl-devel(a)lists.fedoraproject.org, ppisar(a)redhat.com,
psabata(a)redhat.com, rhughes(a)redhat.com,
spotrh(a)gmail.com
Target Milestone: ---
Classification: Fedora
After upgrade to Fedora 39 beta one of scripts in irssi (irc client) broke.
After checking what is going on (I do not know Perl) I found out that length of
string was reported with negative sign.
Opened a ticket at Irssi github account
https://github.com/irssi/scripts.irssi.org/issues/857 and went through
debugging a bit.
Turned out that Perl 5.38 drops locale settings when embedded in C. There is a
bug for it already: https://github.com/Perl/perl5/issues/21366
I do not know which solution should be taken to make it work properly. For
irssi script I have hacky workaround. But would be nice to not have such bug on
release of new Fedora version.
Reproducible: Always
Steps to Reproduce:
1. set locale to any UTF-8 one (I use pl_PL.UTF-8)
2. run irssi
3. run "/script exec print Text::CharWidth::mbswidth("─")" command
Actual Results:
Should return "1"
Expected Results:
Returns "-1"
irssi-1.4.4-5.fc39.x86_64
perl-5.38.0-500.fc39.x86_64
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2240458
Report this comment as SPAM: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla&format=report-sp…
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2240533
Bug ID: 2240533
Summary: perl-Date-Handler-1.2-28.fc40: Should build-require
and require/recommend glibc-langpack-en: Locale en_US
does not seem to be implemented on this system,
keeping locale
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Status: NEW
Component: perl-Date-Handler
Assignee: ppisar(a)redhat.com
Reporter: ppisar(a)redhat.com
QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org
CC: perl-devel(a)lists.fedoraproject.org, ppisar(a)redhat.com
Target Milestone: ---
Classification: Fedora
Running tests without glibc-langpack-en produces a lot of warnings:
+ make test
PERL_DL_NONLAZY=1 "/usr/bin/perl" "-MExtUtils::Command::MM" "-MTest::Harness"
"-e" "undef *Test::Harness::Switches; test_harness(0, 'blib/lib', 'blib/arch')"
t/*.t
t/0compiles.t ........ ok
Locale en_US does not seem to be implemented on this system, keeping locale
Locale en_US does not seem to be implemented on this system, keeping locale
Locale en_US does not seem to be implemented on this system, keeping locale
[...]
This is because en_US is a default locale Handler.pm uses:
use constant DEFAULT_LOCALE => 'en_US';
[...]
sub new
[...]
$self->{locale} = "";
if(defined $args->{locale})
{
$self->SetLocale($args->{locale}) ||
$self->SetLocale($self->DEFAULT_LOCALE());
}
else
{
$self->SetLocale($self->DEFAULT_LOCALE());
}
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2240533
Report this comment as SPAM: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla&format=report-sp…
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2245998
Bug ID: 2245998
Summary: Please branch and build perl-Mail-POP3Client in epel9
Product: Fedora EPEL
Version: epel9
Status: NEW
Component: perl-Mail-POP3Client
Assignee: xavier(a)bachelot.org
Reporter: agibson2(a)gmail.com
QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org
CC: perl-devel(a)lists.fedoraproject.org,
rc040203(a)freenet.de, xavier(a)bachelot.org
Target Milestone: ---
Classification: Fedora
Description of problem:
Please branch and build perl-Mail-POP3Client in epel9.
There is a Nagios plugin that can check pop3 servers. I was using this in EL7
and now upgrading to EL9 because of EOL for EL7 next year and ran into this.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2245998
Report this comment as SPAM: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla&format=report-sp…
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2207950
Bug ID: 2207950
Summary: Please build perl-Frontier-RPC for EPEL9
Product: Fedora EPEL
Version: epel9
Status: NEW
Component: perl-Frontier-RPC
Assignee: mmraka(a)redhat.com
Reporter: rik.theys(a)esat.kuleuven.be
QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org
CC: jplesnik(a)redhat.com, kasal(a)ucw.cz, mmraka(a)redhat.com,
mspacek(a)redhat.com,
perl-devel(a)lists.fedoraproject.org,
rhughes(a)redhat.com, rstrode(a)redhat.com
Target Milestone: ---
Classification: Fedora
Hi,
We are running some applications that still require perl-Frontier-RPC-Client.
Would it be possible to also provide a package for EPEL9?
Regards,
Rik
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2207950
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2241707
Bug ID: 2241707
Summary: perl-Apache-DBI-Cache-0.08-46.fc40 FTBFS: DBI
connect('f_dir=tmp1','',...) failed: No such directory
'tmp1 at
/builddir/build/BUILD/Apache-DBI-Cache-0.08/blib/lib/A
pache/DBI/Cache.pm line 228
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
URL: https://koschei.fedoraproject.org/package/perl-Apache-
DBI-Cache
Status: NEW
Component: perl-Apache-DBI-Cache
Assignee: emmanuel(a)seyman.fr
Reporter: ppisar(a)redhat.com
QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org
CC: emmanuel(a)seyman.fr, lkundrak(a)v3.sk,
perl-devel(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
Blocks: 2231791 (F40FTBFS,RAWHIDEFTBFS)
Target Milestone: ---
Classification: Fedora
perl-Apache-DBI-Cache-0.08-46.fc40 fails to build in Fedora 40 because some
tests fail:
t/001cache.t ...... ok
DBI connect('f_dir=tmp1','',...) failed: No such directory 'tmp1 at
/builddir/build/BUILD/Apache-DBI-Cache-0.08/blib/lib/Apache/DBI/Cache.pm line
228.
DBI connect('f_dir=tmp2','',...) failed: No such directory 'tmp2 at
/builddir/build/BUILD/Apache-DBI-Cache-0.08/blib/lib/Apache/DBI/Cache.pm line
228.
# Failed test 't/002noshm.t(18): connect_on_init1'
# at t/002noshm.t line 18.
# Compared reftype($data)
# got : undef
# expect : 'ARRAY'
# Failed test 't/002noshm.t(21): connect_on_init2'
# at t/002noshm.t line 21.
# Compared reftype($data)
# got : undef
# expect : 'ARRAY'
DBI connect('f_dir=tmp1','',...) failed: No such directory 'tmp1 at
t/002noshm.t line 29.
DBI connect('f_dir=tmp1','',...) failed: No such directory 'tmp1 at
t/002noshm.t line 31.
DBI connect('f_dir=tmp1','',...) failed: No such directory 'tmp1 at
t/002noshm.t line 35.
DBI connect('f_dir=tmp1','',...) failed: No such directory 'tmp1 at
t/002noshm.t line 36.
# Failed test 't/002noshm.t(38): statistics after usage1'
# at t/002noshm.t line 38.
# Compared reftype($data)
# got : undef
# expect : 'ARRAY'
# Failed test 't/002noshm.t(43): got different handles'
# at t/002noshm.t line 43.
# Failed test 't/002noshm.t(45): statistics after usage2'
# at t/002noshm.t line 45.
# Compared reftype($data)
# got : undef
# expect : 'ARRAY'
# Looks like you failed 5 tests of 8.
t/002noshm.t ......
Dubious, test returned 5 (wstat 1280, 0x500)
Failed 5/8 subtests
DBI connect('f_dir=tmp1','',...) failed: No such directory 'tmp1 at
/builddir/build/BUILD/Apache-DBI-Cache-0.08/blib/lib/Apache/DBI/Cache.pm line
228.
DBI connect('f_dir=tmp1','',...) failed: No such directory 'tmp1 at
/builddir/build/BUILD/Apache-DBI-Cache-0.08/blib/lib/Apache/DBI/Cache.pm line
228.
# Failed test 't/003plugin.t(34): connect_on_init1'
# at t/003plugin.t line 34.
# Compared reftype($data)
# got : undef
# expect : 'ARRAY'
# Failed test 't/003plugin.t(37): plugin called'
# at t/003plugin.t line 37.
# Compared $data->[1]
# got : '0'
# expect : '4'
DBI connect('f_dir=tmp1','',...) failed: No such directory 'tmp1 at
t/003plugin.t line 47.
# Failed test 't/003plugin.t(50): but handle used'
# at t/003plugin.t line 50.
# Compared reftype($data)
# got : undef
# expect : 'ARRAY'
DBI connect('f_dir=tmp1','',...) failed: No such directory 'tmp1 at
t/003plugin.t line 56.
# Failed test 't/003plugin.t(59): statistics remain unchanged'
# at t/003plugin.t line 59.
# Compared reftype($data)
# got : undef
# expect : 'ARRAY'
DBI connect('f_dir=tmp1','',...) failed: No such directory 'tmp1 at
t/003plugin.t line 65.
# Failed test 't/003plugin.t(68): statistics remain unchanged again'
# at t/003plugin.t line 68.
# Compared reftype($data)
# got : undef
# expect : 'ARRAY'
# Looks like you failed 5 tests of 10.
t/003plugin.t .....
Dubious, test returned 5 (wstat 1280, 0x500)
Failed 5/10 subtests
t/004rootclass.t .. ok
t/005rootclass.t .. ok
t/100mysql.t ...... skipped: no database given, see README
t/200imadbi.t ..... ok
t/201imadbi.t ..... ok
t/202imadbi.t ..... ok
t/203classdbi.t ... ok
t/204classdbi.t ... ok
t/205classdbi.t ... ok
Test Summary Report
-------------------
t/002noshm.t (Wstat: 1280 (exited 5) Tests: 8 Failed: 5)
Failed tests: 2-3, 6-8
Non-zero exit status: 5
t/003plugin.t (Wstat: 1280 (exited 5) Tests: 10 Failed: 5)
Failed tests: 1-2, 6, 8, 10
Non-zero exit status: 5
Files=12, Tests=112, 1 wallclock secs ( 0.04 usr 0.01 sys + 1.09 cusr 0.19
csys = 1.33 CPU)
Result: FAIL
A difference between passing and failing build root is at
<https://koschei.fedoraproject.org/build/16408212>.
Referenced Bugs:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2231791
[Bug 2231791] Fedora 40 FTBFS Tracker
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2241707
Report this comment as SPAM: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla&format=report-sp…
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2245509
Bug ID: 2245509
Summary: Please upgrade perl-GDGraph to >= 1.56
Product: Fedora
Version: 38
Status: NEW
Component: perl-GDGraph
Assignee: spotrh(a)gmail.com
Reporter: rc040203(a)freenet.de
QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org
CC: paul(a)city-fan.org, perl-devel(a)lists.fedoraproject.org,
spotrh(a)gmail.com
Target Milestone: ---
Classification: Fedora
Upstream rt has released rt-5.0.5, which among other issues fix 2 yet
undisclosed CVEs (cf. https://docs.bestpractical.com/release-notes/rt/5.0.5)
Due to this, I intend to upgrade rt on all released Fedoras, ASAP.
Unfortunately, a prerequistite of rt-5.0.5 is perl-GDGraph >= 1.56, ie. all
released Fedoras but f37 provide a suffiently recent perl-GDGraph.
Please upgrade perl-GDGraph for fc37 to >= 1.56.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2245509
Report this comment as SPAM: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla&format=report-sp…
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2245459
Bug ID: 2245459
Summary: Please upgrade perl-DBIx-SearchBuilder to >= 1.77
Product: Fedora
Version: 38
OS: Linux
Status: NEW
Component: perl-DBIx-SearchBuilder
Severity: medium
Assignee: rc040203(a)freenet.de
Reporter: rc040203(a)freenet.de
QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org
CC: lxtnow(a)gmail.com, perl-devel(a)lists.fedoraproject.org,
rc040203(a)freenet.de
Target Milestone: ---
Classification: Fedora
Please upgrade perl-DBIx-SearchBuilder to >= 1.77 on all released Fedoras.
perl-DBIx-SearchBuilder >= 1.77 is a prerequistite of rt-5.0.5, which is
supposed to fix two yet undisclosed CVEs on older versions of rt.
Reproducible: Always
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2245459
Report this comment as SPAM: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla&format=report-sp…
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2238688
Bug ID: 2238688
Summary: perl-Plack-Middleware-Deflater-0.12-28.fc40 FTBFS:
tests fail
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
URL: https://koschei.fedoraproject.org/package/perl-Plack-M
iddleware-Deflater?collection=f40
Status: NEW
Component: perl-Plack-Middleware-Deflater
Assignee: robinlee.sysu(a)gmail.com
Reporter: ppisar(a)redhat.com
QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org
CC: perl-devel(a)lists.fedoraproject.org,
robinlee.sysu(a)gmail.com
Blocks: 2231791 (F40FTBFS,RAWHIDEFTBFS)
Target Milestone: ---
Classification: Fedora
perl-Plack-Middleware-Deflater-0.12-28.fc40 fails to build in Fedora 40 because
all tests fail like this:
# Failed test at t/content_type.t line 23.
# got: undef
# expected: 'Hello World'
# Failed test at t/content_type.t line 38.
# got: undef
# expected: 'Hello World'
# Looks like you failed 2 tests of 6.
t/content_type.t ....
Dubious, test returned 2 (wstat 512, 0x200)
Failed 2/6 subtests
A difference between passing and failing build roots is at
<https://koschei.fedoraproject.org/build/16236923>.
Referenced Bugs:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2231791
[Bug 2231791] Fedora 40 FTBFS Tracker
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2238688
Report this comment as SPAM: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla&format=report-sp…
This is the mail system at host mailman01.iad2.fedoraproject.org.
Your message was successfully delivered to the destination(s)
listed below. If the message was delivered to mailbox you will
receive no further notifications. Otherwise you may still receive
notifications of mail delivery errors from other systems.
The mail system
<perl-devel(a)lists.fedoraproject.org>: delivery via spamassassin: delivered via
spamassassin service
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2245662
Bug ID: 2245662
Summary: perl-Inline-Python fails to build with Python 3.13:
error: implicit declaration of function
`Py_SetProgramName`
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Status: NEW
Component: perl-Inline-Python
Assignee: mattias.ellert(a)physics.uu.se
Reporter: ksurma(a)redhat.com
QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org
CC: j.k.nilsen(a)usit.uio.no, ksurma(a)redhat.com,
mattias.ellert(a)physics.uu.se, mhroncok(a)redhat.com,
perl-devel(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
Blocks: 2231791 (F40FTBFS,RAWHIDEFTBFS), 2244836 (PYTHON3.13)
Target Milestone: ---
Classification: Fedora
perl-Inline-Python fails to build with Python 3.13.0a1.
Python.xs: In function ‘do_pyinit’:
Python.xs:33:5: error: implicit declaration of function
‘Py_SetProgramName’; did you mean ‘Py_GetProgramName’?
[-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
33 | Py_SetProgramName(L"python");
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
| Py_GetProgramName
Python.xs:40:5: error: implicit declaration of function ‘PySys_SetArgv’
[-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
40 | PySys_SetArgv(_python_argc, _python_argv); /* Tk needs this */
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~
cc1: some warnings being treated as errors
Py_SetProgramName has been removed from Python 3.13.
According to https://docs.python.org/3.13/whatsnew/3.13.html:
Py_SetProgramName(): set PyConfig.program_name instead.
For the build logs, see:
https://copr-be.cloud.fedoraproject.org/results/@python/python3.13/fedora-r…
For all our attempts to build perl-Inline-Python with Python 3.13, see:
https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/g/python/python3.13/package/perl-In…
Testing and mass rebuild of packages is happening in copr.
You can follow these instructions to test locally in mock if your package
builds with Python 3.13:
https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/g/python/python3.13/
Let us know here if you have any questions.
Python 3.13 is planned to be included in Fedora 41.
To make that update smoother, we're building Fedora packages with all
pre-releases of Python 3.13.
A build failure prevents us from testing all dependent packages (transitive
[Build]Requires),
so if this package is required a lot, it's important for us to get it fixed
soon.
We'd appreciate help from the people who know this package best,
but if you don't want to work on this now, let us know so we can try to work
around it on our side.
Referenced Bugs:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2231791
[Bug 2231791] Fedora 40 FTBFS Tracker
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2244836
[Bug 2244836] Python 3.13
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2245662
Report this comment as SPAM: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla&format=report-sp…
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2245834
Bug ID: 2245834
Summary: perl-DBD-MySQL-5.002 is available
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Status: NEW
Component: perl-DBD-MySQL
Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged
Assignee: jplesnik(a)redhat.com
Reporter: upstream-release-monitoring(a)fedoraproject.org
QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org
CC: jplesnik(a)redhat.com, kasal(a)ucw.cz, mschorm(a)redhat.com,
mspacek(a)redhat.com,
perl-devel(a)lists.fedoraproject.org,
rhughes(a)redhat.com, rstrode(a)redhat.com
Target Milestone: ---
Classification: Fedora
Releases retrieved: 5.002
Upstream release that is considered latest: 5.002
Current version/release in rawhide: 5.001-2.fc40
URL: https://metacpan.org/dist/DBD-mysql/
Please consult the package updates policy before you issue an update to a
stable branch: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/fesco/Updates_Policy/
More information about the service that created this bug can be found at:
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/package-maintainers/Upstream_Release_M…
Please keep in mind that with any upstream change, there may also be packaging
changes that need to be made. Specifically, please remember that it is your
responsibility to review the new version to ensure that the licensing is still
correct and that no non-free or legally problematic items have been added
upstream.
Based on the information from Anitya:
https://release-monitoring.org/project/2807/
To change the monitoring settings for the project, please visit:
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/perl-DBD-MySQL
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2245834
Report this comment as SPAM: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla&format=report-sp…
otaylor opened a new pull-request against the project: `perl` that you are following:
``
Make builds for inclusion in an application Flatpak work
``
To reply, visit the link below
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/perl/pull-request/1
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2242077
Bug ID: 2242077
Summary: perl-DBD-MySQL-5.001 is available
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Status: NEW
Component: perl-DBD-MySQL
Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged
Assignee: jplesnik(a)redhat.com
Reporter: upstream-release-monitoring(a)fedoraproject.org
QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org
CC: jplesnik(a)redhat.com, kasal(a)ucw.cz, mschorm(a)redhat.com,
mspacek(a)redhat.com,
perl-devel(a)lists.fedoraproject.org,
rhughes(a)redhat.com, rstrode(a)redhat.com
Target Milestone: ---
Classification: Fedora
Releases retrieved: 5.001
Upstream release that is considered latest: 5.001
Current version/release in rawhide: 4.050-18.fc39
URL: http://search.cpan.org/dist/DBD-mysql/
Please consult the package updates policy before you issue an update to a
stable branch: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/fesco/Updates_Policy/
More information about the service that created this bug can be found at:
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/package-maintainers/Upstream_Release_M…
Please keep in mind that with any upstream change, there may also be packaging
changes that need to be made. Specifically, please remember that it is your
responsibility to review the new version to ensure that the licensing is still
correct and that no non-free or legally problematic items have been added
upstream.
Based on the information from Anitya:
https://release-monitoring.org/project/2807/
To change the monitoring settings for the project, please visit:
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/perl-DBD-MySQL
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2242077
Report this comment as SPAM: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla&format=report-sp…
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2242322
Bug ID: 2242322
Summary: perl-HTTP-BrowserDetect for EL8
Product: Fedora EPEL
Version: epel8
Status: NEW
Component: perl-HTTP-BrowserDetect
Assignee: emmanuel(a)seyman.fr
Reporter: xavier(a)bachelot.org
QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org
CC: emmanuel(a)seyman.fr,
perl-devel(a)lists.fedoraproject.org, steve(a)silug.org
Target Milestone: ---
Classification: Fedora
Hi,
Could you please build perl-HTTP-BrowserDetect for EPEL 8 ?
I was able to build version 3.23 (commit
b0cef569ba956a093760c1c99555e63c1d962d8e).
I don't think any later version will build due to the dependency on
perl-JSON-PP >= 4.04 (commit ad7080adff06c5d011ea1e3665200c1ea04fddc4).
I can take care of this by myself if you add me to the package. My FAS is
xavierb.
Regards,
Xavier
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2242322
Report this comment as SPAM: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla&format=report-sp…
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2238816
Bug ID: 2238816
Summary: Perl-HTTP-Server-Simple for EL9
Product: Fedora EPEL
Version: epel9
Status: NEW
Component: perl-HTTP-Server-Simple
Assignee: spotrh(a)gmail.com
Reporter: xavier(a)bachelot.org
QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org
CC: perl-devel(a)lists.fedoraproject.org, spotrh(a)gmail.com
Target Milestone: ---
Classification: Fedora
Hi,
Could you please branch and build Perl-HTTP-Server-Simple for EPEL9 ?
I can take care of this if you don't want to. My FAS is xavierb.
Regards,
Xavier
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2238816
Report this comment as SPAM: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla&format=report-sp…
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2149107
Bug ID: 2149107
Summary: Please branch and build package in epel9
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Status: NEW
Component: perl-REST-Client
Assignee: emmanuel(a)seyman.fr
Reporter: emmanuel(a)seyman.fr
QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org
CC: emmanuel(a)seyman.fr, perl-devel(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
Target Milestone: ---
Classification: Fedora
I've received private email asking me to branch and build this package in
epel9.
I'm creating a bug in Bugzilla to better track the issue.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2149107
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2149109
Bug ID: 2149109
Summary: Please branch and build package in epel9
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Status: NEW
Component: perl-HTTP-Server-Simple
Assignee: spotrh(a)gmail.com
Reporter: emmanuel(a)seyman.fr
QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org
CC: jose.p.oliveira.oss(a)gmail.com,
perl-devel(a)lists.fedoraproject.org, spotrh(a)gmail.com
Blocks: 2149107
Target Milestone: ---
Classification: Fedora
I've been asked over in bug #2149107 to branch perl-REST-Client for EPEL9.
Since that package requires this one to build, I'm asking you to branch
perl-HTTP-Server-Simple for EPEL9 as well.
I'll be happy to maintain it if it's too much trouble for you.
Referenced Bugs:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2149107
[Bug 2149107] Please branch and build package in epel9
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2149109
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2232304
Bug ID: 2232304
Summary: RFE: epel9 branch of perl-Mozilla-PublicSuffix
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Status: NEW
Component: perl-Mozilla-PublicSuffix
Assignee: yaneti(a)declera.com
Reporter: paul(a)city-fan.org
QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org
CC: perl-devel(a)lists.fedoraproject.org, yaneti(a)declera.com
Target Milestone: ---
Classification: Fedora
I would like to update my perl-Finance-Quote package in epel9 to the latest
version but it has a new dependency perl(HTTP::CookieJar::LWP) from the
perl-HTTP-CookieJar package, which doesn't currently exist in epel9, and that
in turn needs perl-Mozilla-PublicSuffix, which is not currently available in
epel9 either.
I would like to request epel9 branches of these two packages, which I think are
both maintained by the same person. I would be happy to raise a separate ticket
for perl-HTTP-CookieJar if that is preferred.
In case you do not wish to maintain packages in EPEL, I would be happy to
maintain these myself (FAS: pghmcfc) if you would add me as a committer to the
package.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2232304
Report this comment as SPAM: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla&format=report-sp…
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2242265
Bug ID: 2242265
Summary: perl-Module-ScanDeps-1.34-1.fc40 FTBFS on Perl
bootstrap: Failed test 'AutoLoader.pm detected' at
t/19-autosplit.t line 33: Undefined subroutine
&Foo::blab called at /tmp/TrUJrLgxdv.pl line 5
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
URL: https://ppisar.fedorapeople.org/perl_rebuild/scratch/i
ndex.xhtml#pperl-Module-ScanDeps
Status: NEW
Component: perl-Module-ScanDeps
Assignee: jplesnik(a)redhat.com
Reporter: ppisar(a)redhat.com
QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org
CC: anon.amish(a)gmail.com, jplesnik(a)redhat.com,
perl-devel(a)lists.fedoraproject.org, steve(a)silug.org
Target Milestone: ---
Classification: Fedora
perl-Module-ScanDeps-1.34-1.fc40 fails a test when boostrapping Perl:
# use autosplitted module - static scan
# Failed test 'AutoLoader.pm detected'
# at t/19-autosplit.t line 33.
# use autosplitted module - runtime scan, absolute search path
Undefined subroutine &Foo::blab called at /tmp/TrUJrLgxdv.pl line 5.
SYSTEM ERROR in executing /tmp/TrUJrLgxdv.pl fee fo fum: 512 at
/builddir/build/BUILD/Module-ScanDeps-1.34/blib/lib/Module/ScanDeps.pm line
1566.
# Tests were run but no plan was declared and done_testing() was not seen.
# Looks like your test exited with 2 just after 7.
t/19-autosplit.t ................................
Dubious, test returned 2 (wstat 512, 0x200)
Failed 1/7 subtests
According to scratch Perl boostrap history
<https://ppisar.fedorapeople.org/perl_rebuild/scratch/2023-10-02/index.xhtml…>
it started when perl-Module-ScanDeps was upgraded from 1.33-1.fc40 to
1.34-2.fc40 and these two packages emereged in a build root:
perl-blib-1.07
perl-IPC-Run3-0.048
I cannot reproduce simply by defining perl_bootstrap, so it's probably needs
additional Perl packages built in bootstrap mode.
Please note that perl-Module-ScanDeps blocks perl-Module-Install which blocks a
lot of other packages.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2242265
Report this comment as SPAM: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla&format=report-sp…
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2241845
Bug ID: 2241845
Summary: perl-IPC-Run-20231003.0 is available
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Status: NEW
Component: perl-IPC-Run
Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged
Assignee: paul(a)city-fan.org
Reporter: upstream-release-monitoring(a)fedoraproject.org
QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org
CC: jplesnik(a)redhat.com, mspacek(a)redhat.com,
paul(a)city-fan.org, perl-devel(a)lists.fedoraproject.org,
ppisar(a)redhat.com, steve(a)silug.org
Target Milestone: ---
Classification: Fedora
Releases retrieved: 20231003.0
Upstream release that is considered latest: 20231003.0
Current version/release in rawhide: 20220807.0-4.fc39
URL: http://search.cpan.org/dist/IPC-Run
Please consult the package updates policy before you issue an update to a
stable branch: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/fesco/Updates_Policy/
More information about the service that created this bug can be found at:
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/package-maintainers/Upstream_Release_M…
Please keep in mind that with any upstream change, there may also be packaging
changes that need to be made. Specifically, please remember that it is your
responsibility to review the new version to ensure that the licensing is still
correct and that no non-free or legally problematic items have been added
upstream.
Based on the information from Anitya:
https://release-monitoring.org/project/7128/
To change the monitoring settings for the project, please visit:
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/perl-IPC-Run
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2241845
Report this comment as SPAM: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla&format=report-sp…