[Bug 1745564] New: Upgrade perl-XML-RSS to 1.61
by bugzilla@redhat.com
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1745564
Bug ID: 1745564
Summary: Upgrade perl-XML-RSS to 1.61
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Status: NEW
Component: perl-XML-RSS
Assignee: tcallawa(a)redhat.com
Reporter: jplesnik(a)redhat.com
QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org
CC: perl-devel(a)lists.fedoraproject.org,
tcallawa(a)redhat.com
Target Milestone: ---
Classification: Fedora
Latest Fedora delivers 1.60 version. Upstream released 1.61. When you have free
time, please upgrade it.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
3 years
[Bug 1807857] New: please build perl-Sys-SigAction on EPEL8
by bugzilla@redhat.com
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1807857
Bug ID: 1807857
Summary: please build perl-Sys-SigAction on EPEL8
Product: Fedora EPEL
Version: epel8
Status: NEW
Component: perl-Sys-SigAction
Assignee: tremble(a)tremble.org.uk
Reporter: lionel.cons(a)cern.ch
QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org
CC: andreas(a)bawue.net, perl-devel(a)lists.fedoraproject.org,
tremble(a)tremble.org.uk
Target Milestone: ---
Classification: Fedora
Could you please build perl-Sys-SigAction on EPEL8?
It would make sense to also upgrade to the latest version (0.23). EPEL7 has
0.20.
Thanks!
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
3 years, 1 month
[Bug 1781754] New: Co-maintainer request (to maintain EPEL8 branch)
by bugzilla@redhat.com
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1781754
Bug ID: 1781754
Summary: Co-maintainer request (to maintain EPEL8 branch)
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Status: NEW
Component: perl-Net-OpenSSH
Assignee: steve.traylen(a)cern.ch
Reporter: i.gnatenko.brain(a)gmail.com
QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org
CC: jakub.jedelsky(a)gmail.com,
perl-devel(a)lists.fedoraproject.org,
steve.traylen(a)cern.ch, tjczepiel(a)gmail.com
Target Milestone: ---
Classification: Fedora
Hello,
We are working on bringing multiple perl packages into a 'upstream' (EPEL)
which we use internally (at GoodData). This package is one of many which have
builds in Fedora Rawhide but lacks EPEL8 branch. We would like to request it
and help you to maintain the package (incl. Fedora Rawhide).
Please add us to a maintainer list for the package perl-Net-OpenSSH. Our FAS
usernames are:
- tjmc
- kubo
Thanks for the cooperation in advance!
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
3 years, 3 months
[Bug 1781753] New: Co-maintainer request (to maintain EPEL8 branch)
by bugzilla@redhat.com
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1781753
Bug ID: 1781753
Summary: Co-maintainer request (to maintain EPEL8 branch)
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Status: NEW
Component: perl-Net-Amazon-S3
Assignee: ppisar(a)redhat.com
Reporter: i.gnatenko.brain(a)gmail.com
QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org
CC: jakub.jedelsky(a)gmail.com,
perl-devel(a)lists.fedoraproject.org, ppisar(a)redhat.com,
rrati(a)redhat.com, tjczepiel(a)gmail.com
Target Milestone: ---
Classification: Fedora
Hello,
We are working on bringing multiple perl packages into a 'upstream' (EPEL)
which we use internally (at GoodData). This package is one of many which have
builds in Fedora Rawhide but lacks EPEL8 branch. We would like to request it
and help you to maintain the package (incl. Fedora Rawhide).
Please add us to a maintainer list for the package perl-Net-Amazon-S3. Our FAS
usernames are:
- tjmc
- kubo
Thanks for the cooperation in advance!
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
3 years, 4 months
[Bug 1744419] New: Replace /etc/rc.d/init.d/httpd by systemctl
by bugzilla@redhat.com
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1744419
Bug ID: 1744419
Summary: Replace /etc/rc.d/init.d/httpd by systemctl
Product: Fedora
Version: 30
OS: Linux
Status: NEW
Component: w3c-markup-validator
Assignee: nathanael(a)gnat.ca
Reporter: jan.kratochvil(a)redhat.com
QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org
CC: nathanael(a)gnat.ca, perl-devel(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
Target Milestone: ---
Classification: Fedora
Description of problem:
Scripts are obsolete.
Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
w3c-markup-validator-1.3-16.fc30.noarch
How reproducible:
Always.
Steps to Reproduce:
1. dnf install w3c-markup-validator
2. Access http://localhost/w3c-validator/
Actual results:
File not found.
Expected results:
Validator.
Additional info:
.spec scripts are calling:
/etc/rc.d/init.d/httpd reload
They should call:
systemctl try-reload-or-restart httpd
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
3 years, 4 months
[Bug 1772783] New: Upgrade perl-Crypt-X509 to 0.52
by bugzilla@redhat.com
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1772783
Bug ID: 1772783
Summary: Upgrade perl-Crypt-X509 to 0.52
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Status: NEW
Component: perl-Crypt-X509
Assignee: rc040203(a)freenet.de
Reporter: jplesnik(a)redhat.com
QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org
CC: perl-devel(a)lists.fedoraproject.org,
rc040203(a)freenet.de
Target Milestone: ---
Classification: Fedora
Latest Fedora delivers 0.51 version. Upstream released 0.52. When you have free
time, please upgrade it.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
3 years, 4 months
[Bug 1781737] New: Co-maintainer request (to maintain EPEL8 branch)
by bugzilla@redhat.com
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1781737
Bug ID: 1781737
Summary: Co-maintainer request (to maintain EPEL8 branch)
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Status: NEW
Component: perl-DBD-ODBC
Assignee: holcapek(a)gmail.com
Reporter: i.gnatenko.brain(a)gmail.com
QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org
CC: holcapek(a)gmail.com, jakub.jedelsky(a)gmail.com,
lkundrak(a)v3.sk, perl-devel(a)lists.fedoraproject.org,
tjczepiel(a)gmail.com
Target Milestone: ---
Classification: Fedora
Hello,
We are working on bringing multiple perl packages into a 'upstream' (EPEL)
which we use internally (at GoodData). This package is one of many which have
builds in Fedora Rawhide but lacks EPEL8 branch. We would like to request it
and help you to maintain the package (incl. Fedora Rawhide).
Please add us to a maintainer list for the package perl-DBD-ODBC. Our FAS
usernames are:
- tjmc
- kubo
Thanks for the cooperation in advance!
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
3 years, 5 months
[Bug 1753543] New: perl-Font-AFM for EL8
by bugzilla@redhat.com
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1753543
Bug ID: 1753543
Summary: perl-Font-AFM for EL8
Product: Fedora EPEL
Version: epel8
Status: NEW
Component: perl-Font-AFM
Assignee: tcallawa(a)redhat.com
Reporter: xavier(a)bachelot.org
QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org
CC: lxtnow(a)gmail.com, perl-devel(a)lists.fedoraproject.org,
rc040203(a)freenet.de, rob.myers(a)gtri.gatech.edu,
tcallawa(a)redhat.com, tremble(a)tremble.org.uk
Target Milestone: ---
Classification: Fedora
Hi,
Could you please branch and build perl-FontAFM for EPEL 8 ?
It is in the dependency chain of another package I'd like to maintain in EPEL
8.
Regards,
Xavier
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
3 years, 5 months
[Bug 1749132] New: Too strict gir lib search pattern
by bugzilla@redhat.com
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1749132
Bug ID: 1749132
Summary: Too strict gir lib search pattern
Product: Fedora
Version: 30
Status: NEW
Component: perl-Glib-Object-Introspection
Assignee: berrange(a)redhat.com
Reporter: iamdexpl(a)gmail.com
QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org
CC: berrange(a)redhat.com, ddick(a)cpan.org,
perl-devel(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
Target Milestone: ---
Classification: Fedora
Created attachment 1611740
--> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=1611740&action=edit
A less-strict template
Description of problem: perli11ndoc script from perl-Glib-Object-Introspection
can either display a window with a drop-down list of available GIRs or, if
launched with a GIR name, find the corresponding file, parse it and dump to
stdout. The latter mode has, among other things, a check whether the given
argument can be a valid GIR name. However the pattern to check against is too
strict. For example, it filters out GdkX11, libxfce4panel, libxfce4ui,
libxfce4util and PangoFT2
Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
How reproducible:
Steps to Reproduce:
1. install and of the following — pango-devel, xfce4-panel, libxfce4ui,
gtk3-devel, libxfce4util
2. run perli11ndoc without arguments; ensure that the GIR matching the
installed package is listed in a drop-down list
3. run perli11ndoc GdkX11 (or whatever name from that packages installed on
step 1)
Actual results: "Cannot recognize the library name" on stderr
Expected results: contents of that GIR on stdout
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
3 years, 5 months