[Bug 1781744] New: Co-maintainer request (to maintain EPEL8 branch)
by bugzilla@redhat.com
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1781744
Bug ID: 1781744
Summary: Co-maintainer request (to maintain EPEL8 branch)
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Status: NEW
Component: perl-GnuPG-Interface
Assignee: emmanuel(a)seyman.fr
Reporter: i.gnatenko.brain(a)gmail.com
QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org
CC: emmanuel(a)seyman.fr, fedora(a)mj41.cz,
jakub.jedelsky(a)gmail.com,
perl-devel(a)lists.fedoraproject.org,
tjczepiel(a)gmail.com, xavier(a)bachelot.org
Target Milestone: ---
Classification: Fedora
Hello,
We are working on bringing multiple perl packages into a 'upstream' (EPEL)
which we use internally (at GoodData). This package is one of many which have
builds in Fedora Rawhide but lacks EPEL8 branch. We would like to request it
and help you to maintain the package (incl. Fedora Rawhide).
Please add us to a maintainer list for the package perl-GnuPG-Interface. Our
FAS usernames are:
- tjmc
- kubo
Thanks for the cooperation in advance!
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
4 years, 4 months
[Bug 1781759] New: Co-maintainer request (to maintain EPEL8 branch)
by bugzilla@redhat.com
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1781759
Bug ID: 1781759
Summary: Co-maintainer request (to maintain EPEL8 branch)
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Status: NEW
Component: perl-SQL-Abstract
Assignee: tcallawa(a)redhat.com
Reporter: i.gnatenko.brain(a)gmail.com
QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org
CC: jakub.jedelsky(a)gmail.com,
perl-devel(a)lists.fedoraproject.org,
tcallawa(a)redhat.com, tjczepiel(a)gmail.com
Target Milestone: ---
Classification: Fedora
Hello,
We are working on bringing multiple perl packages into a 'upstream' (EPEL)
which we use internally (at GoodData). This package is one of many which have
builds in Fedora Rawhide but lacks EPEL8 branch. We would like to request it
and help you to maintain the package (incl. Fedora Rawhide).
Please add us to a maintainer list for the package perl-SQL-Abstract. Our FAS
usernames are:
- tjmc
- kubo
Thanks for the cooperation in advance!
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
4 years, 4 months
[Bug 1781747] New: Co-maintainer request (to maintain EPEL8 branch)
by bugzilla@redhat.com
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1781747
Bug ID: 1781747
Summary: Co-maintainer request (to maintain EPEL8 branch)
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Status: NEW
Component: perl-HTTP-Body
Assignee: tcallawa(a)redhat.com
Reporter: i.gnatenko.brain(a)gmail.com
QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org
CC: jakub.jedelsky(a)gmail.com,
perl-devel(a)lists.fedoraproject.org,
tcallawa(a)redhat.com, tjczepiel(a)gmail.com
Target Milestone: ---
Classification: Fedora
Hello,
We are working on bringing multiple perl packages into a 'upstream' (EPEL)
which we use internally (at GoodData). This package is one of many which have
builds in Fedora Rawhide but lacks EPEL8 branch. We would like to request it
and help you to maintain the package (incl. Fedora Rawhide).
Please add us to a maintainer list for the package perl-HTTP-Body. Our FAS
usernames are:
- tjmc
- kubo
Thanks for the cooperation in advance!
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
4 years, 4 months
[Bug 1781740] New: Co-maintainer request (to maintain EPEL8 branch)
by bugzilla@redhat.com
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1781740
Bug ID: 1781740
Summary: Co-maintainer request (to maintain EPEL8 branch)
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Status: NEW
Component: perl-Email-Valid
Assignee: tcallawa(a)redhat.com
Reporter: i.gnatenko.brain(a)gmail.com
QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org
CC: jakub.jedelsky(a)gmail.com,
perl-devel(a)lists.fedoraproject.org,
tcallawa(a)redhat.com, tjczepiel(a)gmail.com
Target Milestone: ---
Classification: Fedora
Hello,
We are working on bringing multiple perl packages into a 'upstream' (EPEL)
which we use internally (at GoodData). This package is one of many which have
builds in Fedora Rawhide but lacks EPEL8 branch. We would like to request it
and help you to maintain the package (incl. Fedora Rawhide).
Please add us to a maintainer list for the package perl-Email-Valid. Our FAS
usernames are:
- tjmc
- kubo
Thanks for the cooperation in advance!
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
4 years, 4 months
[Bug 1781251] Unbundle flamegraph from perl-Devel-NYTProf
by bugzilla@redhat.com
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1781251
Jerry James <loganjerry(a)gmail.com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |iarnell(a)gmail.com,
| |jplesnik(a)redhat.com,
| |perl-devel(a)lists.fedoraproj
| |ect.org
Component|flamegraph |perl-Devel-NYTProf
Version|31 |rawhide
Assignee|loganjerry(a)gmail.com |jplesnik(a)redhat.com
Summary|flamegraph uses |Unbundle flamegraph from
|/usr/bin/flamegraph.pl |perl-Devel-NYTProf
|which conflicts with older |
|package perl-Devel-NYTProf, |
|and should be renamed |
Doc Type|--- |If docs needed, set a value
--- Comment #1 from Jerry James <loganjerry(a)gmail.com> ---
Actually, they are not different. The flamegraph.pl in perl-Devel-NYTProf is a
bundled copy of Brendan Gregg's flamegraph, which is now shipped in Fedora in
the flamegraph package. The correct fix to this issue is to unbundle
flamegraph from perl-Devel-NYTProf. It looks like it should be easy. Simply
remove %{buildroot}%{_bindir}/flamegraph.pl in %install, and add "Requires:
flamegraph" to the spec file.
The version in perl-Devel-NYTProf is a little older than the one in the
flamegraph package. I have looked at the differences. The version in the
flamegraph package has several bug fixes (mostly regarding Unicode characters
and SVG images) that are not fixed in the version in perl-Devel-NYTProf. There
are a couple of backwards incompatible changes, but grep did not find any uses
of them in perl-Devel-NYTProf, so I believe that unbundling is safe.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
4 years, 4 months
[Bug 1781056] New: Upgrade perl-DateTime-Format-Natural to 1.08
by bugzilla@redhat.com
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1781056
Bug ID: 1781056
Summary: Upgrade perl-DateTime-Format-Natural to 1.08
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Status: NEW
Component: perl-DateTime-Format-Natural
Assignee: jplesnik(a)redhat.com
Reporter: jplesnik(a)redhat.com
QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org
CC: iarnell(a)gmail.com, jplesnik(a)redhat.com,
perl-devel(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
Target Milestone: ---
Classification: Fedora
Latest Fedora delivers 1.07 version. Upstream released 1.08. When you have free
time, please upgrade it.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
4 years, 4 months
[Bug 1780944] New: Failing dependencies for package perl-Net-SNMP
by bugzilla@redhat.com
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1780944
Bug ID: 1780944
Summary: Failing dependencies for package perl-Net-SNMP
Product: Fedora EPEL
Version: epel8
Status: NEW
Component: perl-Net-SNMP
Assignee: tcallawa(a)redhat.com
Reporter: info(a)itfuzzi.de
QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org
CC: jose.p.oliveira.oss(a)gmail.com,
perl-devel(a)lists.fedoraproject.org,
tcallawa(a)redhat.com
Target Milestone: ---
Classification: Fedora
Description of problem:
Package perl-Net-SNMP cannot be installed due to missing dependencies.
Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
perl-Net-SNMP-6.0.1-25.el8.1.noarch
How reproducible:
always
Steps to Reproduce:
1. dnf install epel-release
2. dnf install perl-Net-SNMP
Actual results:
Error:
Problem: conflicting requests
- nothing provides perl(Digest::SHA1) >= 1.02 needed by
perl-Net-SNMP-6.0.1-25.el8.1.noarch
Expected results:
successful installation
Additional info:
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
4 years, 4 months