[Bug 1485309] New: [Request] Package upgrade
by bugzilla@redhat.com
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1485309
Bug ID: 1485309
Summary: [Request] Package upgrade
Product: Fedora EPEL
Version: epel7
Component: perl-Email-Simple
Severity: low
Assignee: tcallawa(a)redhat.com
Reporter: s.hamacher(a)science-computing.de
QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org
CC: paul(a)city-fan.org, perl-devel(a)lists.fedoraproject.org,
rob.myers(a)gtri.gatech.edu, tcallawa(a)redhat.com,
xavier(a)bachelot.org
The package provides Email::Simple, currently in version 2.203 (from 2014). Is
it possible to get a more recent version? It is needed for a Foswiki
installation which requires at least version 2.206 of that module.
Thanks.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
6 years, 5 months
[Bug 1473856] New: Conflict in perl-libs-4:5.24
by bugzilla@redhat.com
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1473856
Bug ID: 1473856
Summary: Conflict in perl-libs-4:5.24
Product: Fedora
Version: 25
Component: perl
Assignee: jplesnik(a)redhat.com
Reporter: winter(a)kde.org
QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org
CC: cweyl(a)alumni.drew.edu, iarnell(a)gmail.com,
jplesnik(a)redhat.com, kasal(a)ucw.cz,
perl-devel(a)lists.fedoraproject.org, ppisar(a)redhat.com,
psabata(a)redhat.com, rc040203(a)freenet.de,
tcallawa(a)redhat.com
Description of problem:
dnf update is showing a conflict between packages perl-libs i686 and x86_64
Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
perl-libs-4:5.24.2-387
How reproducible:
dnf update
Actual results:
Running transaction test
The downloaded packages were saved in cache until the next successful
transaction.
You can remove cached packages by executing 'dnf clean packages'.
Error: Transaction check error:
file /usr/share/man/man3/XSLoader.3pm.gz from install of
perl-libs-4:5.24.2-387.fc25.i686 conflicts with file from package
perl-libs-4:5.24.1-386.fc25.x86_64
file /usr/share/man/man3/integer.3pm.gz from install of
perl-libs-4:5.24.2-387.fc25.i686 conflicts with file from package
perl-libs-4:5.24.1-386.fc25.x86_64
file /usr/share/man/man3/re.3pm.gz from install of
perl-libs-4:5.24.2-387.fc25.i686 conflicts with file from package
perl-libs-4:5.24.1-386.fc25.x86_64
file /usr/share/man/man3/strict.3pm.gz from install of
perl-libs-4:5.24.2-387.fc25.i686 conflicts with file from package
perl-libs-4:5.24.1-386.fc25.x86_64
file /usr/share/man/man3/utf8.3pm.gz from install of
perl-libs-4:5.24.2-387.fc25.i686 conflicts with file from package
perl-libs-4:5.24.1-386.fc25.x86_64
file /usr/share/man/man3/warnings.3pm.gz from install of
perl-libs-4:5.24.2-387.fc25.i686 conflicts with file from package
perl-libs-4:5.24.1-386.fc25.x86_64
Expected results:
update should work
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
6 years, 5 months
[Bug 1336403] New: perl-Email-Abstract-3.008-4.fc25 FTBS:
t/abstractions.t test fails: Failed test 'correct stringification of
Mail::Internet; same as reference object'
by Red Hat Bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1336403
Bug ID: 1336403
Summary: perl-Email-Abstract-3.008-4.fc25 FTBS:
t/abstractions.t test fails: Failed test 'correct
stringification of Mail::Internet; same as reference
object'
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: perl-Email-Abstract
Assignee: tcallawa(a)redhat.com
Reporter: ppisar(a)redhat.com
QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org
CC: perl-devel(a)lists.fedoraproject.org,
tcallawa(a)redhat.com
perl-Email-Abstract-3.008-4.fc25 fails to build in F25 because tests fail:
/00-report-prereqs.t .. ok
# testing Email::MIME with 1.937
# testing Email::Simple with 2.210
# testing MIME::Entity with 5.507
# testing Mail::Internet with 2.17
# Failed test 'correct stringification of Mail::Internet; same as reference
object'
# at t/lib/Test/EmailAbstract.pm line 74.
# got: ''
# expected: 'Joanna, All
#
# Thanks. I got the following response from Fred Tydeman.
#
# On Nov 13, 9:56am in "Re: Defect in XBD lr", Joanna Farley wrote:
# > Sun's expert in this area after some discussions with a colleague
# > outside of Sun concluded that for lround, to align with both C99 and SUS
# > changes of the following form were necessary:
# > this line of text is really long and no one need worry about it but why was
such a long text chosen to begin with i mean really??
#
# -----
# Andrew Josey The Open Group
# Austin Group Chair Apex Plaza,Forbury Road,
# Email: a.josey(a)opengroup.org Reading,Berks.RG1 1AX,England
# Tel: +44 118 9508311 ext 2250 Fax: +44 118 9500110'
# Failed test 'correct body length for Mail::Internet'
# at t/lib/Test/EmailAbstract.pm line 80.
# got: '0'
# expected: '749'
# Failed test 'correct stringification of Mail::Internet; same as reference
object'
# at t/lib/Test/EmailAbstract.pm line 74.
# got: ''
# expected: 'Joanna, All
#
# Thanks. I got the following response from Fred Tydeman.
#
# On Nov 13, 9:56am in "Re: Defect in XBD lr", Joanna Farley wrote:
# > Sun's expert in this area after some discussions with a colleague
# > outside of Sun concluded that for lround, to align with both C99 and SUS
# > changes of the following form were necessary:
# > this line of text is really long and no one need worry about it but why was
such a long text chosen to begin with i mean really??
#
# -----
# Andrew Josey The Open Group
# Austin Group Chair Apex Plaza,Forbury Road,
# Email: a.josey(a)opengroup.org Reading,Berks.RG1 1AX,England
# Tel: +44 118 9508311 ext 2250 Fax: +44 118 9500110'
# Failed test 'correct body length for Mail::Internet'
# at t/lib/Test/EmailAbstract.pm line 80.
# got: '0'
# expected: '749'
# Failed test 'correct stringification of Mail::Internet; same as reference
object'
# at t/lib/Test/EmailAbstract.pm line 74.
# got: ''
# expected: 'Joanna, All
#
# Thanks. I got the following response from Fred Tydeman.
#
# On Nov 13, 9:56am in "Re: Defect in XBD lr", Joanna Farley wrote:
# > Sun's expert in this area after some discussions with a colleague
# > outside of Sun concluded that for lround, to align with both C99 and SUS
# > changes of the following form were necessary:
# > this line of text is really long and no one need worry about it but why was
such a long text chosen to begin with i mean really??
#
# -----
# Andrew Josey The Open Group
# Austin Group Chair Apex Plaza,Forbury Road,
# Email: a.josey(a)opengroup.org Reading,Berks.RG1 1AX,England
# Tel: +44 118 9508311 ext 2250 Fax: +44 118 9500110'
# Failed test 'correct body length for Mail::Internet'
# at t/lib/Test/EmailAbstract.pm line 80.
# got: '0'
# expected: '749'
# testing Mail::Message with 2.118
# testing MIME::Entity with 5.507
# testing Email::MIME with 1.937
# Looks like you failed 6 tests of 165.
t/abstractions.t .......
Dubious, test returned 6 (wstat 1536, 0x600)
Failed 6/165 subtests
This is caused by upgrading perl-MailTools from 2.16-1.fc25 to 2.17-1.fc25.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
6 years, 5 months
[Bug 1507437] New: perl-XML-LibXML-2.0132 is available
by bugzilla@redhat.com
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1507437
Bug ID: 1507437
Summary: perl-XML-LibXML-2.0132 is available
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: perl-XML-LibXML
Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged
Assignee: jplesnik(a)redhat.com
Reporter: upstream-release-monitoring(a)fedoraproject.org
QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org
CC: alexl(a)redhat.com, caillon+fedoraproject(a)gmail.com,
jplesnik(a)redhat.com, kasal(a)ucw.cz,
mbarnes(a)fastmail.com,
perl-devel(a)lists.fedoraproject.org,
rhughes(a)redhat.com, rstrode(a)redhat.com,
sandmann(a)redhat.com
Latest upstream release: 2.0132
Current version/release in rawhide: 2.0131-1.fc28
URL: http://search.cpan.org/dist/XML-LibXML/
Please consult the package updates policy before you issue an update to a
stable branch: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Updates_Policy
More information about the service that created this bug can be found at:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Upstream_release_monitoring
Please keep in mind that with any upstream change, there may also be packaging
changes that need to be made. Specifically, please remember that it is your
responsibility to review the new version to ensure that the licensing is still
correct and that no non-free or legally problematic items have been added
upstream.
Based on the information from anitya:
https://release-monitoring.org/project/3527/
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
6 years, 5 months
[Bug 1506120] New: perl-XML-LibXML-2.0131 is available
by bugzilla@redhat.com
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1506120
Bug ID: 1506120
Summary: perl-XML-LibXML-2.0131 is available
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: perl-XML-LibXML
Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged
Assignee: jplesnik(a)redhat.com
Reporter: upstream-release-monitoring(a)fedoraproject.org
QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org
CC: alexl(a)redhat.com, caillon+fedoraproject(a)gmail.com,
jplesnik(a)redhat.com, kasal(a)ucw.cz,
mbarnes(a)fastmail.com,
perl-devel(a)lists.fedoraproject.org,
rhughes(a)redhat.com, rstrode(a)redhat.com,
sandmann(a)redhat.com
Latest upstream release: 2.0131
Current version/release in rawhide: 2.0130-1.fc28
URL: http://search.cpan.org/dist/XML-LibXML/
Please consult the package updates policy before you issue an update to a
stable branch: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Updates_Policy
More information about the service that created this bug can be found at:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Upstream_release_monitoring
Please keep in mind that with any upstream change, there may also be packaging
changes that need to be made. Specifically, please remember that it is your
responsibility to review the new version to ensure that the licensing is still
correct and that no non-free or legally problematic items have been added
upstream.
Based on the information from anitya:
https://release-monitoring.org/project/3527/
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
6 years, 5 months