Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=903531
Bug ID: 903531
Summary: defined(@array) is deprecated at
/usr/share/perl5/vendor_perl/LockFile/Simple.pm line
135 and 136
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: perl-LockFile-Simple
Severity: unspecified
Priority: unspecified
Reporter: ppisar(a)redhat.com
Current perl-LockFile-Simple uses deprecated construction:
$ perl -MLockFile::Simple -e 'LockFile::Simple->make()'
defined(@array) is deprecated at
/usr/share/perl5/vendor_perl/LockFile/Simple.pm line 135.
(Maybe you should just omit the defined()?)
defined(@array) is deprecated at
/usr/share/perl5/vendor_perl/LockFile/Simple.pm line 136.
(Maybe you should just omit the defined()?)
$ rpm -q perl-LockFile-Simple
perl-LockFile-Simple-0.207-10.fc18.noarch
Please fix it.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=4jm1G6J7pQ&a=cc_unsubscribe
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=905112
Bug ID: 905112
Summary: Update to metacpan.org instead of search.cpan.org
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: cpanspec
Severity: unspecified
Priority: unspecified
Reporter: berrange(a)redhat.com
Description of problem:
To quote:
http://perlhacks.com/2013/01/give-me-metacpan/
"Ever since MetaCPAN launched I’ve been getting increasingly irritated with
people who still use links to search.cpan.org. Isn’t it obvious that MetaCPAN
is better? Why do people still insist on sharing links to the older site?
Of course they do it for various reasons. Perhaps they aren’t as in touch with
the modern Perl world as I am. Perhaps they are wary about changing to use the
new shiny toys because they know that a newer shinier one will be along soon.
Perhaps I’m reading a web page from five years ago and they can be forgiven for
not linking to a site that didn’t exist at the time."
Fedora can do its bit to help this, by making cpanspec use metacpan.org instead
of search.cpan.org for newly generated specfiles.
Once cpanspec is updated, a bulk search-replace on all existing Fedora Perl
specs may be considered.
Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
cpanspec-1.78-12.fc18.noarch
How reproducible:
N/A
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=feKMtj1zH9&a=cc_unsubscribe
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=965126
Bug ID: 965126
Summary: License metadata do not reflect cpansign license
Product: Fedora
Version: 18
Component: perl-Module-Signature
Severity: medium
Priority: unspecified
Assignee: paul(a)city-fan.org
Reporter: ppisar(a)redhat.com
QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org
CC: paul(a)city-fan.org, perl-devel(a)lists.fedoraproject.org,
pertusus(a)free.fr
script/cpansign:
=head1 COPYRIGHT
Copyright 2002, 2003, 2006 by Audrey Tang.
This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or
modify it under the same terms as Perl itself.
See L<http://www.perl.com/perl/misc/Artistic.html>
cpansign is distributed with the binary RPM package, but current license tag is
(CC0) only. Please change the license tag value to (CC0 and (GPL+ or
Artistic)).
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=DmTDa8JH6V&a=cc_unsubscribe
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=981277
Bug ID: 981277
Summary: Dependency chain brings in X11
Product: Fedora
Version: 19
Component: perl-Net-Server
Severity: unspecified
Priority: unspecified
Assignee: kevin(a)scrye.com
Reporter: glandvador(a)yahoo.com
QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org
CC: kevin(a)scrye.com, perl-devel(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
Description of problem:
Starting with version 2.xx perl-Net-Server requires perl(Log::Log4perl) which
brings in X11.
Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
perl-Net-Server-2.006-1
How reproducible:
Always
Steps to Reproduce:
1. Upgrade from f17
2.
3.
Additional info:
As this component may be used from mail servers (through postgrey component),
it seems to me overkill to expect graphical libraries.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=biCJBez9sE&a=cc_unsubscribe
Product: Fedora EPEL
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=879007
Bug ID: 879007
Summary: SELinux errors with temporary files
Product: Fedora EPEL
Version: el6
Component: dspam
Severity: unspecified
Priority: unspecified
Reporter: mcepl(a)redhat.com
Created attachment 649380
--> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=649380&action=edit
output of ausearch -m AVC -ts today
Description of problem:
#============= httpd_suexec_t ==============
allow httpd_suexec_t httpd_tmp_t:file { read write };
#============= httpd_sys_script_t ==============
allow httpd_sys_script_t devlog_t:sock_file write;
allow httpd_sys_script_t syslogd_t:unix_dgram_socket sendto;
see attached output of
ausearch -m AVC -ts today
Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
dspam-3.10.2-2.el6.i686
selinux-policy-targeted-3.7.19-181.el6.noarch
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
Summary: cpanspec treats recommended dependencies to required
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=552105
Summary: cpanspec treats recommended dependencies to required
Product: Fedora
Version: 11
Platform: All
OS/Version: Linux
Status: NEW
Severity: medium
Priority: low
Component: cpanspec
AssignedTo: steve(a)silug.org
ReportedBy: tim(a)tim-landscheidt.de
QAContact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org
CC: steve(a)silug.org, fedora-perl-devel-list(a)redhat.com
Classification: Fedora
Created an attachment (id=381464)
--> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=381464)
Patch to ignore "recommends" dependencies.
With cpanspec 1.78, META.yml's "recommends" dependencies are treated as
"requires" ones. That is way too harsh and easily requires many more package
updates than ordinarily necessary. The attached patch fixes this.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
Summary: cpanspec nearly always misses the BuildRequires: perl(Test::More)
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=461350
Summary: cpanspec nearly always misses the BuildRequires:
perl(Test::More)
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Platform: All
OS/Version: Linux
Status: NEW
Severity: medium
Priority: medium
Component: cpanspec
AssignedTo: steve(a)silug.org
ReportedBy: berrange(a)redhat.com
QAContact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org
CC: fedora-perl-devel-list(a)redhat.com
Estimated Hours: 0.0
Classification: Fedora
Description of problem:
cpanspec nearly always misses the BuildRequires: perl(Test::More) for test
suite files.
I imagine this is because the 'use' statement often has trailing arguments
use Test::More tests => 19;
instead of a more usual
use Test::More;
It'd be very helpful if cpanspec picked up this style, because then nearly all
its autogenerated specs would be correct.
Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
cpanspec-1.77-1.fc9.noarch
How reproducible:
Often
Steps to Reproduce:
1. cpanspec Data-Section-0.005.tar.gz
2.
3.
Actual results:
Missing BuildRequires: perl(Test::More)
Expected results:
All BuildRequires are correct
Additional info:
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
Summary: Surprising value for --optimize in generated spec file
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=739461
Summary: Surprising value for --optimize in generated spec file
Product: Fedora
Version: 16
Platform: Unspecified
OS/Version: Unspecified
Status: NEW
Severity: unspecified
Priority: unspecified
Component: cpanspec
AssignedTo: steve(a)silug.org
ReportedBy: bochecha(a)fedoraproject.org
QAContact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org
CC: steve(a)silug.org, fedora-perl-devel-list(a)redhat.com
Classification: Fedora
Story Points: ---
Type: ---
Description of problem:
As described in https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=738525#c2, here is
what I get when I run:
$ cpanspec ExtUtils::H2PM
[... snip ...]
%{__perl} Build.PL installdirs=vendor optimize="$RPM_OPT_FLAGS"
[... snip ...]
$ cpanspec -m ExtUtils::H2PM
[... snip ...]
%{__perl} Build.PL installdirs=vendor optimize="%{optimize}"
[... snip ...]
However:
$ rpm --eval "%{optimize}"
%{optimize}
So why is cpanspec writing %{optimize} in the generated spec file? Shouldn't it
use %{optflags} instead?
Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
cpanspec-1.78-9.fc16.noarch
How reproducible:
Always.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
Summary: perl-Crypt-PasswdMD5 not available in RHEL 6 PPC64
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=783740
Summary: perl-Crypt-PasswdMD5 not available in RHEL 6 PPC64
Product: Fedora EPEL
Version: el6
Platform: ppc64
OS/Version: Linux
Status: NEW
Severity: high
Priority: unspecified
Component: perl-Crypt-PasswdMD5
AssignedTo: mmcgrath(a)redhat.com
ReportedBy: jpo(a)di.uminho.pt
QAContact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org
CC: fedora-perl-devel-list(a)redhat.com, mmcgrath(a)redhat.com
Classification: Fedora
Story Points: ---
Type: ---
Regression: ---
Mount Type: ---
Documentation: ---
Description of problem:
The package perl-Crypt-PasswdMD5 is not available in the PPC64 repositories of
RHEL 6 (but it is available in the i386 and x86_64 repositories).
Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
perl-Crypt-PasswdMD5-1.3-6.el6
Actual results:
package: perl-Authen-Simple-0.4-5.el6.noarch from fedora-epel-testing-6-ppc64
unresolved deps:
perl(Crypt::PasswdMD5)
Expected results:
To have it available in a PPC64 repository (maybe in EPEL6)
Additional info:
Current SRPM:
ftp://ftp.redhat.com/pub/redhat/linux/enterprise/6Server/en/os/SRPMS/perl-C…
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.