perl-devel February 2014

perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

34 participants
1351 discussions

[Bug 647783] New: perl-Mail-Box shouldn't force spamassassin to be installed
by Red Hat Bugzilla 01 Aug '14

01 Aug '14

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: perl-Mail-Box shouldn't force spamassassin to be installed https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=647783 Summary: perl-Mail-Box shouldn't force spamassassin to be installed Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: Unspecified OS/Version: Unspecified Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: perl-Mail-Box AssignedTo: tcallawa(a)redhat.com ReportedBy: jik(a)kamens.brookline.ma.us QAContact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: tcallawa(a)redhat.com, fedora-perl-devel-list(a)redhat.com Classification: Fedora People who aren't planning on using spamassassin shouldn't be forced to install it just to be able to use the modules in perl-Mail-Box, most of which are totally independent of spamassassin. One fix would be to remove the dependency on Mail::SpamAssassin completely from the perl-Mail-Box RPM, in which case, people who try to use spamassassin functionality in perl-Mail-Box will simply get an error because of the missing module and know they need to install spamassassin. Another fix would be to split the perl modules in spamassassin into a separate RPM, e.g., spamassassin-perl, so they can be installed without the rest of spamassassin. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 30

[Bug 839744] New: Review Request: perl-Rose-DateTime - DateTime helper functions and objects
by Red Hat Bugzilla 01 Aug '14

01 Aug '14

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=839744 Bug ID: 839744 QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org Severity: unspecified Clone Of: 839742 Version: rawhide Depends On: 839742 Priority: unspecified CC: notting(a)redhat.com, package-review(a)lists.fedoraproject.org, perl-devel(a)lists.fedoraproject.org Assignee: nobody(a)fedoraproject.org Summary: Review Request: perl-Rose-DateTime - DateTime helper functions and objects Regression: --- Story Points: --- Classification: Fedora OS: Unspecified Reporter: wfp5p(a)virginia.edu Type: Bug Documentation: --- Hardware: Unspecified Mount Type: --- Status: NEW Component: Package Review Product: Fedora Spec URL: http://wfp.fedorapeople.org/perl-Rose-DateTime.spec SRPM URL: http://wfp.fedorapeople.org/perl-Rose-DateTime-0.537-2.fc17.src.rpm Description: The Rose::DateTime::* modules provide a few convenience functions and objects for use with DateTime dates. This requires Rose::Object Fedora Account System Username: wfp -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 18

[Bug 914301] New: perl-Net-Amazon-S3: FTBFS in rawhide
by Red Hat Bugzilla 28 Jul '14

28 Jul '14

Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=914301 Bug ID: 914301 Summary: perl-Net-Amazon-S3: FTBFS in rawhide Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: perl-Net-Amazon-S3 Severity: unspecified Priority: unspecified Reporter: dennis(a)ausil.us Blocks: 913825 Your package perl-Net-Amazon-S3 failed to build from source in current rawhide. http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=4973101 Build logs: root.log: http://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org/work/tasks/3101/4973101/root.log build.log: http://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org/work/tasks/3101/4973101/build.log state.log: http://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org/work/tasks/3101/4973101/state.log NOTE: build logs are cleaned up after 1 week For details on mass rebuild see https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_19_Mass_Rebuild -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=Ckt0Qp4yv4&a=cc_unsubscribe

1 8

[Bug 890721] New: perl-Net-Amazon-S3 in Fedora 17 is dated and needs to be updated to stop warnings
by Red Hat Bugzilla 28 Jul '14

28 Jul '14

Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=890721 Bug ID: 890721 Summary: perl-Net-Amazon-S3 in Fedora 17 is dated and needs to be updated to stop warnings Product: Fedora Version: 17 Component: perl-Net-Amazon-S3 Severity: medium Priority: unspecified Reporter: paulej(a)arid.us Description of problem: perl-Net-Amazon-S3 in Fedora 17 is at 0.53. A change in Perl syntax has made syntax used in Net/Amazon/S3/Request/ListBucket.pm to be considered deprecated and Perl produces a warning when trying to use the package. Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): perl-Net-Amazon-S3-0.53-3.fc17.noarch How reproducible: Easily reproduced with the 1-line Perl program as shown below. Steps to Reproduce: 1. perl -e "use Net::Amazon::S3" Actual results: Use of qw(...) as parentheses is deprecated at /usr/share/perl5/vendor_perl/Net/Amazon/S3/Request/ListBucket.pm line 22. Expected results: No warnings. Additional info: CPAN is currently at 0.58. I noted the syntax related to this function was changed in that version. It's a trivial syntax change and if it's not possible to use newer source code from CPAN, I would suggest at least incorporating that small syntax change into 0.53-xx used in Fedora. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=pq3py00oEX&a=cc_unsubscribe

1 12

[Bug 1014054] New: perl-Net-Patricia license tag is broken.
by Red Hat Bugzilla 25 Jul '14

25 Jul '14

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1014054 Bug ID: 1014054 Summary: perl-Net-Patricia license tag is broken. Product: Fedora Version: 19 Component: perl-Net-Patricia Assignee: orion(a)cora.nwra.com Reporter: kame55-itasenpara123(a)y2.dion.ne.jp QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: orion(a)cora.nwra.com, perl-devel(a)lists.fedoraproject.org, philipp(a)redfish-solutions.com Hello. SRC rpm is : perl-Net-Patricia-1.20-2.fc19.src.rpm perl-Net-Patricia license tag is broken. (not vaild license tag) See: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:LicensingGuidelines?rd=Packaging/L… I see copyright notice text. copyring notice file list: A) Net-Patricia-1.20/COPYING B) Net-Patricia-1.20/libpatricia/copyright I think that "A" is GPLv2, "B" is 4-cause BSD License. 4-cause BSD License is GPL incompatible. (Adversing cause) I think that this is license problem and non-free. Note: GPL and 4-cause BSD License is free, fedora acceptable licenses. Suggests: 1. resolve license problem (if this is license problematic) and fixing license tag. 2. Remove fedora repos. 3. contact upstream author. Thanks. Reference: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Licensing:Main?rd=Licensing#Good_Licenses -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=1799FaShkg&a=cc_unsubscribe

1 9

[Bug 1068742] New: Request epel7 branch
by Red Hat Bugzilla 21 Jul '14

21 Jul '14

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1068742 Bug ID: 1068742 Summary: Request epel7 branch Product: Fedora EPEL Version: epel7 Component: perl-Mail-Mbox-MessageParser Assignee: mmaslano(a)redhat.com Reporter: nathanael(a)gnat.ca QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: mmaslano(a)redhat.com, paul(a)city-fan.org, perl-devel(a)lists.fedoraproject.org, ppisar(a)redhat.com, psabata(a)redhat.com Hello Some of my packages require this package as part of their dependency chains. Would you mind creating an epel7 build? Branch requests can be made here https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/EPEL/epel7/Requests -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=gx0wr9KYrF&a=cc_unsubscribe

1 8

[Bug 1037242] New: perl-Proc-ProcessTable FTBFS if "-Werror=format-security" flag is used
by Red Hat Bugzilla 21 Jul '14

21 Jul '14

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1037242 Bug ID: 1037242 Summary: perl-Proc-ProcessTable FTBFS if "-Werror=format-security" flag is used Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: perl-Proc-ProcessTable Assignee: andreas(a)bawue.net Reporter: dkholia(a)redhat.com QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: andreas(a)bawue.net, perl-devel(a)lists.fedoraproject.org Description of problem ---------------------- perl-Proc-ProcessTable fails to build if "-Werror=format-security" flag is used. ... OS.c:397:5: error: format not a string literal and no format arguments [-Werror=format-security] OS.c:638:9: error: format not a string literal and no format arguments [-Werror=format-security] ... We are working on a proposal to enable "-Werror=format-security" for all packages. Once this flag is enabled, GCC will refuse to compile code that could be vulnerable to a string format security flaw. For more details, please see https://fedorahosted.org/fesco/ticket/1185 page. To understand why it is important to fix this, please see https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Format-Security-FAQ page. How to fix this --------------- The fix for these errors is quite simple. It's a matter of changing a line like, printf(foo); to read, printf("%s", foo); That's it. Please fix this issue in rawhide with a patch (which you should submit to upstream to merge moving forward). Please do a new build with the fix in rawhide. Other releases do not need to be directly fixed, but there should be no harm in pushing out this fix/patch with other needed changes to those branches. In the event you don't fix this bug before the next mass rebuild, provenpackagers may step in and update your package(s) to fix this issue. How reproducible ---------------- Build perl-Proc-ProcessTable-0.48-2.fc20.src.rpm with "-Werror=format-security" flag to reproduce the problem. To make this process easier, you can use a modified "redhat-rpm-config" package from http://people.fedoraproject.org/~halfie/artifacts/redhat-rpm-config/ URL. $ sha256sum redhat-rpm-config-9.1.0-56.fc20.* faad7594b2080fe76497d0ce50808c905a93dd7b41c1defdde5ca57e3833d3d2 redhat-rpm-config-9.1.0-56.fc20.noarch.rpm 5aa9357174305c7285ffdbc92d7ffe1c07a8a95d5459b930461308f5aad75413 redhat-rpm-config-9.1.0-56.fc20.src.rpm -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=g63zoQoqmq&a=cc_unsubscribe

1 5

[Bug 1066374] New: perl-Socket6-0.25 is available
by Red Hat Bugzilla 16 Jul '14

16 Jul '14

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1066374 Bug ID: 1066374 Summary: perl-Socket6-0.25 is available Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: perl-Socket6 Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged Assignee: wtogami(a)gmail.com Reporter: upstream-release-monitoring(a)fedoraproject.org QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: jpo(a)di.uminho.pt, perl-devel(a)lists.fedoraproject.org, wtogami(a)gmail.com Latest upstream release: 0.25 Current version/release in Fedora Rawhide: 0.23-15.fc21 URL: http://search.cpan.org/dist/Socket6/ Please consult the package updates policy before you issue an update to a stable branch: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Updates_Policy More information about the service that created this bug can be found at: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Upstream_release_monitoring -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=BspCDUVyeg&a=cc_unsubscribe

1 5

[Bug 1059154] New: perl-DBD-SQLite distributes sqlite3 sources
by Red Hat Bugzilla 15 Jul '14

15 Jul '14

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1059154 Bug ID: 1059154 Summary: perl-DBD-SQLite distributes sqlite3 sources Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: perl-DBD-SQLite Assignee: jplesnik(a)redhat.com Reporter: ppisar(a)redhat.com QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: jplesnik(a)redhat.com, mmaslano(a)redhat.com, perl-devel(a)lists.fedoraproject.org, ppisar(a)redhat.com, steve(a)silug.org DBD-SQLite sources come with sqlite3.c, sqlite3.h, and sqlite3ext.h which are bundled SQLite sources. The files are not used when building perl-DBD-SQLite, however they are installed into the system later into /usr/lib64/perl5/vendor_perl/auto/share/dist/DBD-SQLite for this documented purpose: FOR DBD::SQLITE EXTENSION AUTHORS Since 1.30_01, you can retrieve the bundled sqlite C source and/or header like this: use File::ShareDir 'dist_dir'; use File::Spec::Functions 'catfile'; # the whole sqlite3.h header my $sqlite3_h = catfile(dist_dir('DBD-SQLite'), 'sqlite3.h'); [...] You usually want to use this in your extension's "Makefile.PL", and you may want to add DBD::SQLite to your extension's "CONFIGURE_REQUIRES" to ensure your extension users use the same C source/header they use to build DBD::SQLite itself (instead of the ones installed in their system). First it does not match Fedora philosophy, second it installed different sources from those used for building the Perl binding. I propose to remove this feature completely. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=qxOHw1pDB0&a=cc_unsubscribe

1 1

[Bug 1000256] New: mojomojo contains bundled Flash files
by Red Hat Bugzilla 02 Jul '14

02 Jul '14

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1000256 Bug ID: 1000256 Summary: mojomojo contains bundled Flash files Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: mojomojo Assignee: iarnell(a)gmail.com Reporter: tchollingsworth(a)gmail.com QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: iarnell(a)gmail.com, perl-devel(a)lists.fedoraproject.org Blocks: 1000236 (WebAssets-BundledBinaries) This package contains binary files that are typically excuted by the Flash player or another similar program. These files are not permitted in Fedora. [1] Everything we produce needs to be built from source. [2] The offending file(s) shipped in this package are: /usr/share/mojomojo/root/static/flash/swfupload.swf /usr/share/mojomojo/root/static/flash/swfupload_f8.swf /usr/share/mojomojo/root/static/flash/swfupload_f9.swf If these files are just a fallback for something that is now supported by modern web standards like the HTML5 <video> element, please just remove the binaries. If removing these files would seriously cripple your application, please let me know so we can figure out a solution. If you have any questions, please shout. Thanks! [1] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Guidelines#No_inclusion_of_pre-bui… [2] https://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/devel/2013-August/187836.html -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=Yxk8KBRcHs&a=cc_unsubscribe

1 7

← Newer
1
...
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
...
136
Older →

Jump to page:

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

2005

perl-devel February 2014