[perl-Dancer] Update to 1.3098
by Jitka Plesnikova
commit e8f7b0732492052c14f6fb0645d955a406086f13
Author: Jitka Plesnikova <jplesnik(a)redhat.com>
Date: Mon Jul 30 16:20:51 2012 +0200
Update to 1.3098
.gitignore | 1 +
perl-Dancer.spec | 7 +++++--
sources | 2 +-
3 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
---
diff --git a/.gitignore b/.gitignore
index a533060..3f9bd58 100644
--- a/.gitignore
+++ b/.gitignore
@@ -8,3 +8,4 @@
/Dancer-1.3093.tar.gz
/Dancer-1.3095.tar.gz
/Dancer-1.3097.tar.gz
+/Dancer-1.3098.tar.gz
diff --git a/perl-Dancer.spec b/perl-Dancer.spec
index c08dc30..2caabb0 100644
--- a/perl-Dancer.spec
+++ b/perl-Dancer.spec
@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
Name: perl-Dancer
-Version: 1.3097
-Release: 2%{?dist}
+Version: 1.3098
+Release: 1%{?dist}
Summary: Lightweight yet powerful web application framework
License: GPL+ or Artistic
Group: Development/Libraries
@@ -107,6 +107,9 @@ make test
%{_mandir}/man3/*
%changelog
+* Mon Jul 30 2012 Jitka Plesnikova <jplesnik(a)redhat.com> 1.3098-1
+- 1.3098 bump
+
* Fri Jul 20 2012 Fedora Release Engineering <rel-eng(a)lists.fedoraproject.org> - 1.3097-2
- Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_18_Mass_Rebuild
diff --git a/sources b/sources
index 3838ed5..e7ff45a 100644
--- a/sources
+++ b/sources
@@ -1 +1 @@
-b7399681be6e1dfaa8eddcac7147c80f Dancer-1.3097.tar.gz
+53c441ad64e838af9a47741718c152f5 Dancer-1.3098.tar.gz
11 years, 9 months
[Bug 839751] Review Request: perl-Rose-DB - DBI wrapper and abstraction layer
by Red Hat Bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=839751
Jitka Plesnikova <jplesnik(a)redhat.com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Flags| |fedora-review+
--- Comment #2 from Jitka Plesnikova <jplesnik(a)redhat.com> ---
Package Review
==============
Key:
- = N/A
x = Pass
! = Fail
? = Not evaluated
==== Generic ====
[x]: EXTRA Rpmlint is run on all installed packages.
Note: There are rpmlint messages (see attachment).
[x]: EXTRA Spec file according to URL is the same as in SRPM.
[x]: MUST Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets
other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging
Guidelines.
[x]: MUST Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at
least one supported primary architecture.
[x]: MUST %build honors applicable compiler flags or justifies otherwise.
[x]: MUST All build dependencies are listed in BuildRequires, except for any
that are listed in the exceptions section of Packaging Guidelines.
[x]: MUST Buildroot is not present
[x]: MUST Package contains no bundled libraries.
[x]: MUST Changelog in prescribed format.
[x]: MUST Package has no %clean section with rm -rf %{buildroot} (or
$RPM_BUILD_ROOT)
[x]: MUST Sources contain only permissible code or content.
[x]: MUST Each %files section contains %defattr if rpm < 4.4
[x]: MUST Macros in Summary, %description expandable at SRPM build time.
[-]: MUST Package contains desktop file if it is a GUI application.
[-]: MUST Development files must be in a -devel package
[x]: MUST Package requires other packages for directories it uses.
[x]: MUST Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime.
[-]: MUST Package is not known to require ExcludeArch.
[x]: MUST Permissions on files are set properly.
[x]: MUST Package does not contain duplicates in %files.
[x]: MUST Package complies to the Packaging Guidelines
[x]: MUST Spec file lacks Packager, Vendor, PreReq tags.
[x]: MUST Package does not run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) at the
beginning of %install.
[-]: MUST Large documentation files are in a -doc subpackage, if required.
[-]: MUST If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the
license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the
license(s) for the package is included in %doc.
[x]: MUST License field in the package spec file matches the actual license.
[x]: MUST Package consistently uses macro is (instead of hard-coded directory
names).
[x]: MUST Package is named using only allowed ascii characters.
[x]: MUST Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines.
[x]: MUST Package does not generate any conflict.
Note: Package contains no Conflicts: tag(s)
[x]: MUST Package obeys FHS, except libexecdir and /usr/target.
[x]: MUST Package must own all directories that it creates.
[x]: MUST Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages.
[x]: MUST Package installs properly.
[x]: MUST Package is not relocatable.
[!]: MUST Requires correct, justified where necessary.
[x]: MUST Rpmlint is run on all rpms the build produces.
Note: No rpmlint messages.
[x]: MUST Sources used to build the package match the upstream source, as
provided in the spec URL.
[x]: MUST Spec file is legible and written in American English.
[x]: MUST Spec file name must match the spec package %{name}, in the format
%{name}.spec.
[-]: MUST Package contains systemd file(s) if in need.
[x]: MUST File names are valid UTF-8.
[x]: SHOULD Reviewer should test that the package builds in mock.
[-]: SHOULD If the source package does not include license text(s) as a
separate file from upstream, the packager SHOULD query upstream to
include it.
[x]: SHOULD Dist tag is present.
[x]: SHOULD No file requires outside of /etc, /bin, /sbin, /usr/bin,
/usr/sbin.
[x]: SHOULD Final provides and requires are sane (rpm -q --provides and rpm -q
--requires).
[?]: SHOULD Package functions as described.
[x]: SHOULD Latest version is packaged.
[x]: SHOULD Package does not include license text files separate from
upstream.
[x]: SHOULD Patches link to upstream bugs/comments/lists or are otherwise
justified.
[x]: SHOULD SourceX tarball generation or download is documented.
[x]: SHOULD SourceX / PatchY prefixed with %{name}.
[x]: SHOULD SourceX is a working URL.
[-]: SHOULD Description and summary sections in the package spec file contains
translations for supported Non-English languages, if available.
[x]: SHOULD Package should compile and build into binary rpms on all supported
architectures.
[x]: SHOULD %check is present and all tests pass.
[x]: SHOULD Packages should try to preserve timestamps of original installed
files.
[x]: SHOULD Spec use %global instead of %define.
TODO:
* Add to buildrequires:
perl(lib)
perl(base)
perl(Test::Pod) >= 1.00 - ./t/pod.t:7
perl(Scalar::Util)
perl(Carp) - ./lib/Rose/DB/Registry.pm:5
perl(DateTime::Infinite) - ./lib/Rose/DB/Pg.pm:5
perl(Exporter) - ./lib/Rose/DB/Constants.pm:5
* Please add version to buildrequires and requires. The versions are mentioned
in META.yml
perl(Bit::Vector::Overload) 6.4
perl(DateTime::Format::Pg) >= 0.11
perl(Rose::DateTime::Util) >= 0.532
perl(Rose::Object) >= 0.854
* The filter of requires should be removed. It is not needed.
The package was successfully built in rawhide.
Please update the spec file before submit.
Package APPROVED.
Generated by fedora-review 0.2.0 (53cc903) last change: 2012-07-09
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
11 years, 9 months
Broken dependencies: perl-eperl
by Fedora Koji Build System
perl-eperl has broken dependencies in the rawhide tree:
On x86_64:
perl-eperl-2.2.14-19.fc17.x86_64 requires perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.14.2)
On i386:
perl-eperl-2.2.14-19.fc17.i686 requires perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.14.2)
Please resolve this as soon as possible.
11 years, 9 months
Broken dependencies: perl-Class-InsideOut
by Fedora Koji Build System
perl-Class-InsideOut has broken dependencies in the rawhide tree:
On x86_64:
perl-Class-InsideOut-1.10-6.fc17.noarch requires perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.14.2)
On i386:
perl-Class-InsideOut-1.10-6.fc17.noarch requires perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.14.2)
Please resolve this as soon as possible.
11 years, 9 months
Broken dependencies: perl-Unix-Statgrab
by Fedora Koji Build System
perl-Unix-Statgrab has broken dependencies in the rawhide tree:
On x86_64:
perl-Unix-Statgrab-0.04-13.fc17.x86_64 requires perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.14.2)
On i386:
perl-Unix-Statgrab-0.04-13.fc17.i686 requires perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.14.2)
Please resolve this as soon as possible.
11 years, 9 months