[Bug 477426] New: Please convert to new font packaging guidelines
by Red Hat Bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
Summary: Please convert to new font packaging guidelines
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477426
Summary: Please convert to new font packaging guidelines
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Platform: All
OS/Version: Linux
Status: NEW
Severity: medium
Priority: medium
Component: monafont
AssignedTo: mtasaka(a)ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp
ReportedBy: nicolas.mailhot(a)laposte.net
QAContact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org
CC: mtasaka(a)ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp,
fedora-perl-devel-list(a)redhat.com
Classification: Fedora
This bug has been filed because we've detected your package includes one or
several font files:
repoquery -C --repoid=rawhide -f '*.ttf' -f '*.otf' -f '*.pfb'
-f '*.pfa' --qf='%{SOURCERPM}\n' |sed -e
's+-[0-9.-]*\.fc[123456789]\(.*\)src.rpm++g'|sort|uniq
Unfortunately the script
does not detect symlinks to other packages, so if that's your case, you can
close this bug report now.
Otherwise, you should know that:
- Fedora guidelines
demand the packaging of fonts in a separate package or subpackage:
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#Avoid_bundling_of_font...
- our font packaging guidelines recently changed, and every package that ships
fonts must be adapted to the new templates available in the fontpackages-devel
package.
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackagingDrafts/Fonts_packaging_automation_...
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_fonts_policy_package
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Simple_fonts_spec_template
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fonts_spec_template_for_multiple_fonts
Please make
your package conform to the current guidelines in rawhide.
If your package is not
principaly a font package, depending on a separate font package or subpackage
is the prefered solution. If your application does not use fontconfig you can
always package symlinks to the files provided by the font package and installed
in the correct fontconfig directories.
It is preferred to make a font package or
subpackage per font family, though it is not currently a hard guidelines
requirement (it may become before Fedora 11 is released). The definition of a
font family is given on
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fonts_spec_template_notes/font-family
The new
templates should make the creation of font subpackages easy and safe.
The
following packages have already been converted and can serve as examples: -
andika-fonts - apanov-heuristica-fonts - bitstream-vera-fonts - charis-fonts -
dejavu-fonts - ecolier-court-fonts - edrip-fonts - gfs-ambrosia-fonts -
gfs-artemisia-fonts - gfs-baskerville-fonts - gfs-bodoni-classic-fonts -
gfs-bodoni-fonts - gfs-complutum-fonts - gfs-didot-classic-fonts -
gfs-didot-fonts - gfs-eustace-fonts - gfs-fleischman-fonts - gfs-garaldus-fonts
- gfs-gazis-fonts - gfs-jackson-fonts - gfs-neohellenic-fonts -
gfs-nicefore-fonts - gfs-olga-fonts - gfs-porson-fonts - gfs-solomos-fonts -
gfs-theokritos-fonts - stix-fonts - yanone-kaffeesatz-fonts
If you have any remaining
questions about the new guidelines please ask them on fedora-fonts-list at
redhat.com
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
14 years
[Bug 564702] New: FTBFS perl-Catalyst-Runtime-5.80013-2.fc12
by Red Hat Bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
Summary: FTBFS perl-Catalyst-Runtime-5.80013-2.fc12
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=564702
Summary: FTBFS perl-Catalyst-Runtime-5.80013-2.fc12
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Platform: All
URL: http://linux.dell.com/files/fedora/FixBuildRequires/mo
ck-results/
OS/Version: Linux
Status: NEW
Keywords: Triaged
Severity: high
Priority: high
Component: perl-Catalyst-Runtime
AssignedTo: cweyl(a)alumni.drew.edu
ReportedBy: ftbfs(a)fedoraproject.org
QAContact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org
CC: cweyl(a)alumni.drew.edu,
fedora-perl-devel-list(a)redhat.com
Blocks: 538681
Classification: Fedora
perl-Catalyst-Runtime-5.80013-2.fc12.src.rpm Failed To Build From Source
against the rawhide tree. See http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/FTBFS for more
information.
If you believe this is actually a bug in another package, do NOT change the
component in this bug or close this bug. Instead, add the appropriate bug
number from the other package to the "Depends on" line in this bug. If the
other package does not yet have a bug created that you think matches, please
create one. Doing so helps us properly track bugs and their dependencies, just
as we track package dependencies. (If you close this bug, and the other
package is not fixed before the next FTBFS run, a new bug will get created.
Please follow the above advice to avoid such duplication.)
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
14 years
[Bug 484866] New: perl-Network-IPv4Addr : Conflicts with other packages
by Red Hat Bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
Summary: perl-Network-IPv4Addr : Conflicts with other packages
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=484866
Summary: perl-Network-IPv4Addr : Conflicts with other packages
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Platform: All
OS/Version: Linux
Status: NEW
Severity: low
Priority: low
Component: perl-Network-IPv4Addr
AssignedTo: dennis(a)ausil.us
ReportedBy: bugs.michael(a)gmx.net
QAContact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org
CC: fedora-perl-devel-list(a)redhat.com, dennis(a)ausil.us
Classification: Fedora
perl-Network-IPv4Addr-0.05-13.fc11.noarch in rawhide-development-i386
File conflict with: perl-Net-IPv4Addr-0.10-3.fc9.noarch
/usr/share/man/man1/ipv4calc.1.gz
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
14 years
[Bug 484865] New: perl-Net-IPv4Addr : Conflicts with other packages
by Red Hat Bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
Summary: perl-Net-IPv4Addr : Conflicts with other packages
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=484865
Summary: perl-Net-IPv4Addr : Conflicts with other packages
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Platform: All
OS/Version: Linux
Status: NEW
Severity: low
Priority: low
Component: perl-Net-IPv4Addr
AssignedTo: sindrepb(a)fedoraproject.org
ReportedBy: bugs.michael(a)gmx.net
QAContact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org
CC: sindrepb(a)fedoraproject.org,
fedora-perl-devel-list(a)redhat.com
Classification: Fedora
perl-Net-IPv4Addr-0.10-3.fc9.noarch in rawhide-development-i386
File conflict with: perl-Network-IPv4Addr-0.05-13.fc11.noarch
/usr/share/man/man1/ipv4calc.1.gz
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
14 years
[Bug 514942] New: An assertion in FindRef.xs fails
by Red Hat Bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
Summary: An assertion in FindRef.xs fails
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=514942
Summary: An assertion in FindRef.xs fails
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Platform: All
OS/Version: Linux
Status: NEW
Severity: medium
Priority: low
Component: perl-Devel-FindRef
AssignedTo: skasal(a)redhat.com
ReportedBy: skasal(a)redhat.com
QAContact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org
CC: fedora-perl-devel-list(a)redhat.com, kwizart(a)gmail.com
Depends on: 156113
Classification: Fedora
Target Release: ---
Description:
Assertion ((((shplep)->sv_flags & (0x00004000|0x00008000)) ==
0x00008000) && (((svtype)((shplep)->sv_flags & 0xff)) == SVt_PVGV ||
((svtype)((shplep)->sv_flags & 0xff)) == SVt_PVLV)) failed: file
"FindRef.xs", line 212 at
/usr/lib64/perl5/vendor_perl/5.10.0/ppc64-linux-thread-multi/Devel/FindRef.pm
line 196.
This message was observed when running the test suite of Test::Refcount.
Reported upstream (see the external bug link) and the prompt answer was that
Devel::FindRef nay not be used in combination with -DDEBUGGING
Consequently, I'm reopening bug #156113; let's verify then that this bug
disappeared.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
14 years
[Bug 508194] New: RFE: split /usr/bin/padre into own subpackage
by Red Hat Bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
Summary: RFE: split /usr/bin/padre into own subpackage
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=508194
Summary: RFE: split /usr/bin/padre into own subpackage
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Platform: All
OS/Version: Linux
Status: NEW
Severity: medium
Priority: low
Component: perl-Padre
AssignedTo: mmaslano(a)redhat.com
ReportedBy: cweyl(a)alumni.drew.edu
QAContact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org
CC: fedora-perl-devel-list(a)redhat.com, mmaslano(a)redhat.com
Classification: Fedora
Created an attachment (id=349494)
--> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=349494)
spec file patch
It would be nice (and make more sense) if we could split /usr/bin/padre into a
"padre" subpackage here, the same way we do for nopaste (perl-App-Nopaste),
asciio (perl-App-Asciio) and git-cpan-patch (perl-Git-CPAN-Patch), to name a
couple.
I've attached a patch to do this :)
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
14 years, 1 month