perl-devel April 2008

perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

16 participants
175 discussions

[Bug 176889] New: many missing files when rebuilding per-XML-Grove
by Red Hat Bugzilla 10 Jan '13

10 Jan '13

1 4

[Bug 176888] New: perl-RPM-Specfile can't find /usr/share/man/man3/RPM::Specfile.3pm when being built
by Red Hat Bugzilla 10 Jan '13

10 Jan '13

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=176888 Summary: perl-RPM-Specfile can't find /usr/share/man/man3/RPM::Specfile.3pm when being built Product: Fedora Core Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: perl-RPM-Specfile AssignedTo: jvdias(a)redhat.com ReportedBy: jkeating(a)redhat.com CC: fedora-perl-devel-list(a)redhat.com Please see attached log. ------- Additional Comments From jkeating(a)redhat.com 2006-01-03 20:48 EST ------- Created an attachment (id=122740) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=122740&action=view) build failure log -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.

1 4

[Bug 247253] New: Conflicting Provides
by Red Hat Bugzilla 30 Sep '11

30 Sep '11

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=247253 Summary: Conflicting Provides Product: Fedora Version: f7 Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: low Priority: low Component: perl-Time-Piece-MySQL AssignedTo: chris(a)chrisgrau.com ReportedBy: bugs.michael(a)gmx.net QAContact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-perl-devel-list(a)redhat.com perl-Time-Piece provides perl(Time::Piece) EQ 0 1.09 perl-Time-Piece-MySQL provides perl(Time::Piece) required by: perl-Email-Date - 1.102-2.fc7.noarch required by: perl-Time-Piece-MySQL - 0.05-3.fc6.noarch required by: perl-Time-Piece-MySQL - 0.05-3.fc6.noarch required by: perl-Email-Date - 1.102-2.fc7.noarch Indeed. perl-Time-Piece-MySQL does not include a Time::Piece module and therefore must not provide perl(Time::Piece). Luck has it that a second dependency on Time::Seconds pulls in perl-Time-Piece. Else it would break. [...] Further reference, similar cases: https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-perl-devel-list/2007-July/msg00011.h… -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.

1 14

[Bug 228433] New: perl-version: EPEL branch?
by Red Hat Bugzilla 02 Feb '11

02 Feb '11

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=228433 Summary: perl-version: EPEL branch? Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: normal Component: perl-version AssignedTo: tcallawa(a)redhat.com ReportedBy: cweyl(a)alumni.drew.edu QAContact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-perl-devel-list(a)redhat.com A project I'm working on uses perl(version) on RHEL4. Any chance of an EPEL branch? :) (note -- the specfile currently uses Build.PL; as perl-Module-Build isn't available in EPEL yet, it'll probably be necessary to switch over to the standard Makefile.PL provided.) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.

4 15

[Bug 357641] New: EL branches
by Red Hat Bugzilla 12 Oct '10

12 Oct '10

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=357641 Summary: EL branches Product: Fedora Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: low Priority: low Component: perl-Tk AssignedTo: andreas.bierfert(a)lowlatency.de ReportedBy: andreas.bierfert(a)lowlatency.de QAContact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-perl-devel-list(a)redhat.com Package Change Request ====================== Package Name: perl-Tk New Branches: EL-4 EL-5 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.

1 10

[Bug 427049] New: broken spec
by Red Hat Bugzilla 15 Jul '10

15 Jul '10

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=427049 Summary: broken spec Product: Fedora Version: 8 Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: low Priority: low Component: perl-Class-Std AssignedTo: andreas(a)bawue.net ReportedBy: rc040203(a)freenet.de QAContact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-perl-devel-list(a)redhat.com Description of problem: Package doesn't build, because the perl-package split has not been reflected to it. Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): perl-Class-Std-0_0_8-1* How to reproduce: check out from CVS make mockbuild Additional info: I would have fixed this bug in CVS, but you have restrictive ACLs set on this package. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.

1 9

[Bug 247476] New: Changed upstream...
by Red Hat Bugzilla 18 Dec '09

18 Dec '09

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=247476 Summary: Changed upstream... Product: Fedora Version: f7 Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: low Priority: low Component: perl-Mail-SPF-Query AssignedTo: steve(a)silug.org ReportedBy: lmb(a)biosci.ki.se QAContact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-perl-devel-list(a)redhat.com Description of problem: Shouldn't this package be updated/replaced with perl-Mail-SPF 2.005?? Note the missing query in the name. Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): 1.999.1-3.fc7 How reproducible: Steps to Reproduce: 1. 2. 3. Actual results: Expected results: Additional info: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.

1 8

[Bug 237421] New: Bad cpuTime retrieved from Sys::Virt::Domain->get_info
by Red Hat Bugzilla 18 Dec '09

18 Dec '09

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=237421 Summary: Bad cpuTime retrieved from Sys::Virt::Domain->get_info Product: Fedora Extras Version: fc6 Platform: i686 OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: perl-Sys-Virt AssignedTo: steve(a)silug.org ReportedBy: g+fedora(a)pkg.fr QAContact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: berrange@redhat.com,fedora-perl-devel-list@redhat.com Description of problem: I tried the API on a AMD Athlon(tm) XP 3000+, I got bad values with some negative one for the cpuTime of a domain. Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): perl-Sys-Virt-0.1.1 How reproducible: every time Steps to Reproduce: 1. Run a server with some xen domains 2. Try the example included in the package: /usr/share/doc/perl-Sys-Virt-0.1.1/examples/dump-info.pl 3. Observe the "cpuTime" values Actual results: False Expected results: Good Additional info: I search the sources and I found this value is in fact unsigned long long value in libvirt library to represent nanoseconds (cf http://libvirt.org/html/libvirt-libvirt.html#virDomainInfo) I didn't try on a 64 bits arch but I think the it could work on it. I managed to obtain the expected results by patching the sources: I edit Virt.xs from the source and changed the line 359 from: hv_store (RETVAL, "cpuTime", 7, newSViv(info.cpuTime), 0); to hv_store (RETVAL, "cpuTime", 7, newSVnv(info.cpuTime), 0); So the unsigned long long is read as a float scalar and not an integer scalar. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.

1 13

[Bug 199736] New: perl C compiler Can't locate object method "IVX" via package "B::NV"
by Red Hat Bugzilla 03 Dec '09

03 Dec '09

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199736 Summary: perl C compiler Can't locate object method "IVX" via package "B::NV" Product: Fedora Core Version: fc5 Platform: i386 OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: perl AssignedTo: jvdias(a)redhat.com ReportedBy: timliim(a)lucent.com QAContact: dkl(a)redhat.com CC: fedora-perl-devel-list(a)redhat.com Description of problem: When compile perl script into C code, modules complained Can't locate object method "IVX" via package "B::NV" Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): $ rpm -qf /usr/lib/perl5/5.8.8/i386-linux-thread-multi/B/C.pm perl-5.8.8-5 How reproducible: always. Steps to Reproduce: 1. create a file tw.pl with this content: #!/usr/bin/perl -w use strict; package mx; sub new {} #sub x { my $m = 5.1; } 1; 2. compile with this line time perl -MO=C tw.pl > t.c Actual results: Got error msg Can't locate object method "IVX" via package "B::NV" at /usr/lib/perl5/5.8.8/i386-linux-thread-multi/B/C.pm line 650. CHECK failed--call queue aborted. Expected results: Compiling ok, produce a compilable .c file: Additional info: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.

1 6

[Bug 229179] New: check_whitelist and check_spamd scripts missing.
by Red Hat Bugzilla 14 Jul '09

14 Jul '09

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=229179 Summary: check_whitelist and check_spamd scripts missing. Product: Fedora Core Version: fc6 Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: low Priority: normal Component: spamassassin AssignedTo: wtogami(a)redhat.com ReportedBy: m.d.t.evans(a)qmul.ac.uk CC: fedora-perl-devel- list@redhat.com,felicity@kluge.net,jm@jmason.org,parkerm @pobox.com,reg+redhat@sidney.com,wtogami@redhat.com Description of problem: The SA source contains 2 useful perl scripts, one to maintain the autowhitelist database file and a nagios monitoring script. It would be helpful if you could include them. I've attached a patch below (which you will may want to tweak a bit). Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): 3.1.8-1.fc6 ------- Additional Comments From m.d.t.evans(a)qmul.ac.uk 2007-02-19 07:00 EST ------- Created an attachment (id=148315) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=148315&action=view) Patch file for spamassassin that adds check_whitelist and check_spamd scripts. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.

1 12

Jump to page:

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

2005

perl-devel April 2008