[Bug 171578] No way to see why e-mail was marked as Junk
by Red Hat Bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: No way to see why e-mail was marked as Junk
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=171578
------- Additional Comments From redhat(a)nodata.co.uk 2006-03-07 17:14 EST -------
(In reply to comment #3)
> SpamAssassin by default puts headers in the message. Look for X-Spam-Status,
and it'll tell you the rules
> that hit, and potentially give you a report with more details. If it's not
there, you'll have to look into how
> you filter your mail.
Yes it would, if I had setup Spam Assassin myself, but I'm using Spam Assassin
that comes into Evolution.
Can you paste an example portion of the e-mail header added by Evolution's Spam
Assassin please? Which version are you using?
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.
18 years, 1 month
[Bug 183028] Review Request: perl-Spiffy
by Red Hat Bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: perl-Spiffy
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=183028
------- Additional Comments From steve(a)silug.org 2006-03-03 10:51 EST -------
I haven't seen (or come up with) another solution that I'm completely happy with
yet, but I've been watching the "Filtering requires/provides" thread on
fedora-perl-devel-list. When that's resolved, I'll fix this and the other
packages I submitted, and I'll add code to cpanspec to match.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.
18 years, 1 month
perl-DBIx-SearchBuilder: Bizarre build error
by Ralf Corsepius
Hi,
Last night, I issued a rebuild request of perl-DBIx-SearchBuilder for
FC5 and now am facing build errors:
http://buildsys.fedoraproject.org/logs/fedora-development-extras/5571-per...
What puzzles me, is the same spec file having built flawlessly a couple
of weeks ago. Since then, except of the release-tag, this spec file has
not been changed. So I'd assume other perl modules or the main perl
package to be the cause (The previous built was with perl-5.8.7).
Any insights?
Ralf
P.S.:
This example demonstrates that noarch-perl dist rebuilds are useful. ;)
18 years, 1 month