perl-devel February 2006

perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

4 participants
60 discussions

Start a nNew thread

[Bug 180034] Review Request: perl-Font-TTF (part of the dejavu-fonts toolchain)
by Red Hat Bugzilla 05 Feb '06

05 Feb '06

1 0

[Bug 180034] Review Request: perl-Font-TTF (part of the dejavu-fonts toolchain)
by Red Hat Bugzilla 05 Feb '06

05 Feb '06

1 0

[Bug 180034] Review Request: perl-Font-TTF (part of the dejavu-fonts toolchain)
by Red Hat Bugzilla 05 Feb '06

05 Feb '06

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Font-TTF (part of the dejavu-fonts toolchain) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=180034 ------- Additional Comments From Nicolas.Mailhot(a)laPoste.net 2006-02-05 05:33 EST ------- (In reply to comment #2) > Generally you should supply a src.rpm; it makes the review process a bit easier > and some of the review items require having it. I know, it's just that my isp changed it's upload rules and I couldn't locate the new ones yesterday > My rpmlint complains: > W: perl-Font-TTF wrong-file-end-of-line-encoding > /usr/share/doc/perl-Font-TTF-0.37/README.TXT > > and indeed README.TXT has CRLF endings. However, there are several packages > which include documentation files with DOS-style line endings so I don't believe > this is a blocker. Fix it up if you like. It's as you want, the rpmlint in rawhide does not care > Other issues: > I can't review spec file naming. > I can't review the source used to build the SRPM as none was provided. > BuildRequires: perl is not permitted. This line is straight from the fedora-rpmdevtools-1.4-2.fc5 perl template. Is the template wrong ? > The license does not seem to be GPL. I see only: > The Perl TTF module is licensed under the Perl Artistic License. Ok, my mistake, copied the licensing in dries rpm without checking > I don't understand this comment in the %files section: > # For arch-specific packages: vendorarch This is a bit of fedora-rpmdevtools-1.4-2.fc5 perl template I should have snipped > I can't install the resulting RPM: > > error: Failed dependencies: > perl(Win32) is needed by perl-Font-TTF-0.37-1.noarch > perl(Win32::Registry) is needed by perl-Font-TTF-0.37-1.noarch > > I believe this is the result of lib/Font/TTF/Win32.pm. I'm not sure what would > be best to do here. You can fix it with a quick > > rm %{buildroot}/%{perl_vendorlib}/Font/TTF/Win32.pm > > in the %install section but I'm not completely sure if that's acceptable. I agree on this, will do > Another solution would be to postprocess the output of the dependency generator, > but that's rather unpalatable as well (and more complicated than just deleting > the file). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.

1 0

[Bug 180034] Review Request: perl-Font-TTF (part of the dejavu-fonts toolchain)
by Red Hat Bugzilla 05 Feb '06

05 Feb '06

1 0

[Bug 180034] Review Request: perl-Font-TTF (part of the dejavu-fonts toolchain)
by Red Hat Bugzilla 04 Feb '06

04 Feb '06

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Font-TTF (part of the dejavu-fonts toolchain) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=180034 tibbs(a)math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |163778 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From tibbs(a)math.uh.edu 2006-02-04 20:27 EST ------- Generally you should supply a src.rpm; it makes the review process a bit easier and some of the review items require having it. My rpmlint complains: W: perl-Font-TTF wrong-file-end-of-line-encoding /usr/share/doc/perl-Font-TTF-0.37/README.TXT and indeed README.TXT has CRLF endings. However, there are several packages which include documentation files with DOS-style line endings so I don't believe this is a blocker. Fix it up if you like. Other issues: I can't review spec file naming. I can't review the source used to build the SRPM as none was provided. BuildRequires: perl is not permitted. The license does not seem to be GPL. I see only: The Perl TTF module is licensed under the Perl Artistic License. I don't understand this comment in the %files section: # For arch-specific packages: vendorarch I can't install the resulting RPM: error: Failed dependencies: perl(Win32) is needed by perl-Font-TTF-0.37-1.noarch perl(Win32::Registry) is needed by perl-Font-TTF-0.37-1.noarch I believe this is the result of lib/Font/TTF/Win32.pm. I'm not sure what would be best to do here. You can fix it with a quick rm %{buildroot}/%{perl_vendorlib}/Font/TTF/Win32.pm in the %install section but I'm not completely sure if that's acceptable. Another solution would be to postprocess the output of the dependency generator, but that's rather unpalatable as well (and more complicated than just deleting the file). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.

1 0

[Bug 180034] Review Request: perl-Font-TTF (part of the dejavu-fonts toolchain)
by Red Hat Bugzilla 04 Feb '06

04 Feb '06

1 0

[Bug 180034] Review Request: perl-Font-TTF (part of the dejavu-fonts toolchain)
by Red Hat Bugzilla 04 Feb '06

04 Feb '06

1 0

[Bug 180034] Review Request: perl-Font-TTF (part of the dejavu-fonts toolchain)
by Red Hat Bugzilla 04 Feb '06

04 Feb '06

1 0

[Bug 161785] spamassassin restart fails - functions bug?
by Red Hat Bugzilla 02 Feb '06

02 Feb '06

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: spamassassin restart fails - functions bug? https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=161785 ------- Additional Comments From mitr(a)redhat.com 2006-02-03 01:42 EST ------- FWIW, killproc and other initscript functions now support -p to specify the PID file location, so the symlink hack should no longer be necessary. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.

1 0

[Bug 167354] Review Request: amavisd-new
by Red Hat Bugzilla 02 Feb '06

02 Feb '06

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: amavisd-new https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=167354 steve(a)silug.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From steve(a)silug.org 2006-02-02 22:30 EST ------- Please open a new bug if you can reproduce the problem with 2.3.3-5 when it comes out of the build system. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.

1 0

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

2005

perl-devel February 2006