[Bug 165885] Misnamed package, add Provides?
by Red Hat Bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Misnamed package, add Provides?
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=165885
------- Additional Comments From rc040203(a)freenet.de 2005-08-16 03:11 EST -------
(In reply to comment #2)
> I thought that the package naming guidelines would have adviced to use
> perl-$CPANDIST, but instead it goes on to say things about "the CPAN module
> name".
Can we agree upon this and make this mandatory for FE?
Is there consenus on this?
> IMO, that makes no sense because the unit of CPAN module packaging is a CPAN
> _distribution_, and the vast majority those distributions contain more than
> one module. What's "the CPAN module name" then? Just using the CPAN
> distribution name would work, and is already used in all CPAN packages I'm
> aware of.
I would not bet on FC, but I guess, you are right as far as FE is concerned.
How to proceed with this package?
1. Apply cvs tricks (I.e. an admin moving the files in CVS)?
2. Re-import the package into CVS under "perl-gettext" and "cvs rm"
perl-Locale-gettext?
3. Let it be in FC-4 and re-import it as "perl-gettext" into "devel"?
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.
18 years, 8 months
[Bug 165907] perl: specfile cleanup and update to 5.8.7
by Red Hat Bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: perl: specfile cleanup and update to 5.8.7
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=165907
------- Additional Comments From jpo(a)di.uminho.pt 2005-08-14 10:10 EST -------
(In reply to comment #7)
> ... I want to avoid the case of the version of obsoleted
> perl-subpackage modules going backwards temporarily.
Can you be more specific? Which perl-subpackage/module would be going backwards?
Additional info about Perl and core modules versions
(source: corelist):
Perl Filter::Simple Filter::Util::Call Time::HiRes
5.008005 0.78 1.0601 1.59
5.008006 0.78 1.0601 1.65
5.008007 0.78 1.0601 1.66
FC4 - Perl core modules in external packages
perl-Filter-1.30-7.i386.rpm
* includes Filter::Util::Call version 1.06
perl-Filter-Simple-0.79-5.noarch.rpm
perl-Time-HiRes-1.65-1.i386.rpm
Example of strange dependencies
$ rpm -q --whatrequires "perl(Filter::Util::Call)"
perl-5.8.6-15
$ rpm -q --whatprovides "perl(Filter::Util::Call)"
perl-Filter-1.30-7
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.
18 years, 8 months
[Bug 156113] [PATCH] Perl is build with debugging support
by Red Hat Bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: [PATCH] Perl is build with debugging support
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=156113
ville.skytta(a)iki.fi changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Summary|Perl is build with debugging|[PATCH] Perl is build with
|support |debugging support
Keywords| |Patch
------- Additional Comments From ville.skytta(a)iki.fi 2005-08-14 05:20 EST -------
Warren, while you're rolling the Rawhide Perl updates, could you slip this one
in (patch in comment 1) so more people could start testing?
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.
18 years, 8 months
[Bug 165857] Parse directory not owned by perl-Parse-Yapp-1.05-32
by Red Hat Bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Parse directory not owned by perl-Parse-Yapp-1.05-32
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=165857
ville.skytta(a)iki.fi changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|NEW |CLOSED
Resolution| |CURRENTRELEASE
Fixed In Version| |1.05-33
------- Additional Comments From ville.skytta(a)iki.fi 2005-08-14 05:14 EST -------
Warren probably meant to close this one too as a part of yesterday's batch;
I'm pretty certain that this won't be fixed for FC3 if it's the only thing
needing an update in the package. The dir ownerships have already been fixed
in FC4+.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.
18 years, 8 months