On Tue, 2022-02-15 at 15:46 +0100, Miro Hrončok wrote:
On 15. 02. 22 15:31, Sérgio Basto wrote:
> On Tue, 2022-02-15 at 10:33 +0100, Miro Hrončok wrote:
> > On 14. 02. 22 10:34, Michal Schorm wrote:
> > > The time had to come, when two packages would generate the same
> > > hash.
> > >
> > > I was hit by:
> > > ---
> > > Error: Transaction test error:
> > > file/usr/lib/.build-
> > > id/34/feaa549462e8818baa0629ce11da344465882b
> > > conflicts between attempted installs of discord-0.0.16-
> > > 1.fc35.x86_64
> > > and skypeforlinux-188.8.131.52-1.x86_64
> > > ---
> > > some time ago but since neither is a package maintained by
> > > Fedora
> > > Project maintainers, no one gave a damn about the core of the
> > > issue.
> > > That time, I got one of the apps as a Flatpak instead, but not
> > > all
> > > packages have such workarounds at hand.
> > That's because they both ship the same electron binary.
> Right , so ? two package can't ship the same binary on Fedora ?
I never said that. What I meant is that that problem is known and I
help with a different problem.
I was being ironic, I didn't want to say that either, sorry.
But I think the root of the problem is the same, .build-id hash be the
same is not a coincidence .
Also we have old bug reports about .build-id hash conflicts , IIRC .
Sérgio M. B.