Stephen opened this FPC ticket: https://pagure.io/packaging- committee/issue/777 So, I'm stepping back from writing the draft... think it would just slow down the process, since you folks are more clear on what you're wanting - and I'm fine with what both Stephen and Jason wrote previously.

On Fri, Jun 22, 2018 at 10:02 AM, Gerald B. Cox gbcox@bzb.us wrote:

FESCo has decided to review this topic at their next meeting. I will hold off submitting another draft pending the results of that discussion.

https://pagure.io/fesco/issue/1918

On Thu, Jun 21, 2018 at 5:05 PM, Gerald B. Cox gbcox@bzb.us wrote:

...

On Thu, Jun 21, 2018 at 3:14 PM, Jason L Tibbitts III tibbs@math.uh.edu wrote:

...

...

...

...

>> "GBC" == Gerald B Cox gbcox@bzb.us writes:

To me this doesn't make much sense in the context in which you have put it. The existing hardware activation section is just this paragraph: ... I don't disagree with the idea behind what you're proposing, but the hardware activation section is quite the wrong place to put it.

It seems to me that a far more appropriate place would be in the https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:DefaultServices document

...

Completely agree. I'll make the changes and repost another draft via email.

Thanks for you help Jason!