Not sure if this is the right list for this question. Sorry I can't find anything about this in the wiki.
I'm planning on updating the hugin package, but there have been so many changes that the spec file is largely rewritten - I've split out a hugin-base sub-package, the build system has changed to cmake, there are now .so libraries etc...
Should I submit a bugzilla review request even though this is an 'old' package?
On Mon, 2008-01-21 at 17:08 +0000, Bruno Postle wrote:
Not sure if this is the right list for this question. Sorry I can't find anything about this in the wiki.
I'm planning on updating the hugin package, but there have been so many changes that the spec file is largely rewritten - I've split out a hugin-base sub-package, the build system has changed to cmake, there are now .so libraries etc...
Should I submit a bugzilla review request even though this is an 'old' package?
If you can make it so that a user can type "yum update" to update the packages and still use the application the same way as before then I don't see a need for a re-review.
On Mon, 21 Jan 2008 17:08:56 +0000 Bruno Postle bruno@postle.net wrote:
I'm planning on updating the hugin package, but there have been so many changes that the spec file is largely rewritten - I've split out a hugin-base sub-package, the build system has changed to cmake, there are now .so libraries etc...
Should I submit a bugzilla review request even though this is an 'old' package?
At any time you want to have a fresh review done of your package you should feel free to set the flag accordingly and ask for a new review. We only currently require a review when bringing a new package in, but we shouldn't stop folks who want to get a fresh look at their package.
packaging@lists.fedoraproject.org