On 12/12/14 11:42, Michael Schwendt wrote:
On Fri, 12 Dec 2014 11:29:52 +0100, Tomas Radej wrote:
> Please note: https://fedorahosted.org/fpc/ticket/478
Could you cover the directory ownership, too?
Dir ownership is incomplete/inconsistent.
Fixed by adding the section "Directory ownership" .
Create a devassistant-filesystem package if necessary, which could
reused where appropriate.
# repoquery --whatprovides /usr/share/devassistant/meta
# repoquery --whatprovides /usr/share/devassistant/doc
All directories in question will be owned by the package devassistant-core. We have a COPR
build of DevAssistant 0.10.1 at , which conforms to the layout described in the
guidelines. You can examine the packages therein to verify my claims. Should these
guidelines be accepted, the package of DevAssistant in Rawhide would be very similar to
the one in COPR.
Multiple owners (and incorrect naming of the package?):
# repoquery --whatprovides /usr/share/devassistant/assistants
The package openlmi-devassistant was not created in accordance to these guidelines, and
will have to be changed/dropped. We will talk to the maintainers to rectify the
# repoquery --whatprovides /usr/share/devassistant
# repoquery --whatprovides /usr/share/devassistant/files
# repoquery --whatprovides /usr/share/devassistant/files/crt
# repoquery --whatprovides /usr/share/devassistant/icons
# repoquery --whatprovides /usr/share/devassistant/icons/crt
Please, bear in mind that the version of DevAssistant present in Fedora 21 and Rawhide at
the moment (0.9.3) is not subject these guidelines. They will not take effect in Fedora
21, and the version 0.9.3 is to be replaced by version 0.10.1 in Rawhide.
Regards, Tomas Radej
packaging mailing list