I figure it's worth writing this up.
PackagingDrafts/PostRelease FESCO approves, but Warren would like a comment added to the effect that packagers should document in the specfile any weird upstream versioning conventions which they're trying to massage into a sortable RPM EVR.
I indicated that I did not believe that the PC would have any issue with adding such a comment.
PackagingDrafts/ExtraDistTagConditionalMacros FESCO is onboard here, but the issue is down to implementation. And of course there's an ongoing thread in fedora-devel.
PackagingDrafts/Utf8Filenames FESCO approves.
- J<
On Thu, 2007-03-29 at 13:19 -0500, Jason L Tibbitts III wrote:
I figure it's worth writing this up.
PackagingDrafts/PostRelease FESCO approves, but Warren would like a comment added to the effect that packagers should document in the specfile any weird upstream versioning conventions which they're trying to massage into a sortable RPM EVR.
I indicated that I did not believe that the PC would have any issue with adding such a comment.
PackagingDrafts/ExtraDistTagConditionalMacros FESCO is onboard here, but the issue is down to implementation. And of course there's an ongoing thread in fedora-devel.
PackagingDrafts/Utf8Filenames FESCO approves.
Thanks tibbs. :)
~spot
packaging@lists.fedoraproject.org