-----Original Message-----
From: packaging-bounces(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
[mailto:packaging-bounces@lists.fedoraproject.org] On Behalf Of Garrett
Holmstrom
Sent: Wednesday, May 05, 2010 6:14 PM
To: Discussion of RPM packaging standards and practices for Fedora
Subject: Re: [Fedora-packaging] create a wrapper installer
On 5/5/2010 18:04, MGandra(a)diskeeper.com wrote:
I have an rpm package for installation. Before I install I should
display the License Agreement and when the user accepts it then I should
install the package. I know we don’t have user interaction in rpm, what
I am looking at is how to create an wrapper so that I can present this
license agreement and then ask the user to agree it and if he says “Yes”
or “y” I can continue to install.
I have seen programs like“jdk-6u18-linux-i586-rpm.bin” and other which
are able to do this. We will just change the file to exectable and then run
it.
We've found this problematic in the past at my workplace. In
particular, it makes the product very difficult to automatically install
or update since customers never get their hands on the actual binary
RPMs. This forces sysadmins to log into every machine individually
every time they want to install or update the program just so the
installer can display some license agreement they've already read and
agreed to. This is especially important to corporate customers who
don't care to spend their time doing this for a network of hundreds of
machines. If you insist on using a wrapper, please make it possible to
extract the binary RPM so customers can add it to their private package
management systems and avoid this mess.
As a simple alternative, I suggest sending customers to a web page with
the license agreement that they can accept before actually downloading
product RPMs. This makes it easier both for packagers like yourself as
well as for customers who want to roll out products to a number of
computers. Sun, Oracle, and VMware all do this sort of thing with many
of their products since there's no point in making somebody accept the
same license agreement hundreds of times.
I understand the concerns but we want to do that. Can you tell how to do
that?
--
packaging mailing list
packaging(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/packaging
__________ Information from ESET NOD32 Antivirus, version of virus signature
database 5089 (20100505) __________
The message was checked by ESET NOD32 Antivirus.
http://www.eset.com
__________ Information from ESET NOD32 Antivirus, version of virus signature
database 5092 (20100506) __________
The message was checked by ESET NOD32 Antivirus.
http://www.eset.com