On Fri, Oct 10, 2008 at 9:02 AM, Michel Salim <michel.sylvan(a)gmail.com> wrote:
When packaging a package that contains Emacs mode files, should the
Emacs subpackage require emacs(bin) or emacs? emacs(bin) seems to be
commonly used, but this is not provided by RedHat/Fedora Emacs
packages until version 22; RHEL 5.2 is still on 21.4 and thus EPEL
packages would have to be specially handled.
A related question: why emacs(bin) ? xemacs provides xemacs(bin) too
so the question applies there. We don't ever plan for the binary to be
provided in a subpackage, do we?
miʃel salim • http://hircus.jaiku.com/
IUCS • msalim(a)cs.indiana.edu
Fedora • salimma(a)fedoraproject.org
MacPorts • hircus(a)macports.org