On Fri, Jul 21, 2006 at 12:06:39PM -0500, Tom 'spot' Callaway wrote:
On Fri, 2006-07-21 at 17:51 +0200, Thorsten Leemhuis wrote:
> BTW, when we initially discussed the kmod standard there was also (IIRC)
> a strong resistance from multiple important and well known people at
> redhat against overloading %{NAME} with the output of "uname -r". I
> doubt that option changed. Spot? Jeremy? f13?
Yep. I'm still very strongly against overloading %{NAME}. We don't
permit any other package to do this for any reason, and I don't want to
start now. Name is not for versioning.
Well, it's good to know as that kills any review attempt of the
current scheme.
--
Axel.Thimm at
ATrpms.net