Le Lun 8 janvier 2007 17:09, Axel Thimm a écrit :
On Mon, Jan 08, 2007 at 11:03:54AM -0500, Fernando Nasser wrote:
> Axel, 1.10 wins over 1.09. Why do you need an Epoch in this
Sorry, I meant 1.1 vs 1.09.
Then the best practice would be to write 1.1 1.10 (I hope this is
documented somewhere). Tought of course it would be better if upstream
used a fixed digit number, but some developpers have been known to take
this suggestion as a pretext to rant on Red Hat in general, and rpm in