On Tue, Sep 14, 2010 at 04:02:33PM -0300, Sergio Belkin wrote:
2010/9/14 Toshio Kuratomi <a.badger(a)gmail.com>:
> On Mon, Sep 13, 2010 at 09:10:31PM -0300, Sergio Belkin wrote:
>> Hi Fedora people!,
>>
>> I have been reading
>>
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Guidelines#Explicit_Requires.
>>
>> It says that we should avoid explicit requires...
>>
>> I want to make sure that I understood it. Is an "explicit requires" is
both:
>>
>> 1) A full package: eg: mysql-libs
>> 2) A versioned library file:libmysqlclient.so.16.0.0
>>
>> So, the right way should be:
>>
>> Requires: libmysqlclient.so
>>
>> Please fix me if I misunderstood that.
>>
> No. Listing a library in a Requires: tag at all is an explicit requires.
> ie:
> Requires: libmysqlclient.so
>
> is also not allowed.
>
> RPM is generally good about discovering what libraries a program needs to
> run. So it will find that your program needs libmysqlclient.so.16 and
> create a Requires on it automatically. You do not need to list it in your
> package if this is the case.
>
> -Toshio
>
Thanks Toshio, can we say that explicit == added by hand ==
non-automagical ;-) ?
That would be accurate. I've added a sentence to the Guideline:
"""
Explicit Requires are Requires added manually by the packager in the spec
file.
"""
Hope that helps,
Toshio