On Sat, 25 Oct 2008 16:53:42 +0200
Thorsten Leemhuis <fedora(a)leemhuis.info> wrote:
On 25.10.2008 15:47, Patrice Dumas wrote:
>
> In
>
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#Summary_and_description
>
> I suggest changing README.Fedora to README.Dist, see for an
> argumentation:
>
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageMaintainers/Packaging_Tricks#Avoidin...
I really appreciate the general idea, but I don't like the term
".Dist" to much, as it is a bit misleading imho: some people might
think that file might contain "informations relevant for distribution
of the package".
I thought about a alternative, but all my mind came up with was
"distribution-specific-notes" -- that has the same problem as noted
above, but it's imho not that worse. But that filename is quite
long :-/
Maybe somebody else comes up with something that is shorter and more
accurate...
I tend to use "README.RPM" or some variant thereof (e.g.
README-SELinux.RPM).
Paul.