Le lundi 28 mai 2007 à 13:16 +0200, Patrice Dumas a écrit :
On Mon, May 28, 2007 at 12:00:42PM +0200, Nicolas Mailhot wrote:
>
> Which sort-of hints shipping static libs is a short-term workaround and
> energy would be better spend making tools like eclipse integrate our
> best-of-breed infrastructure (autoconf, rpm, yum, mock whatever)
> transparently so these people don't have to spend time on plumbing to
> produce modern sofwtare.
I can't see the connection between eclipse and the issues at stake
here... Shipping static libs is not necessarily a short term workaround,
dynamic libs keep changing ABI and one cannot necesarily install
everytime the libs on all the computers he may want to run a program.
How is it related with eclipse???
Replace one can not with it's too much hassle to and you'll see where I
was going. Reduce the hassle factor doing things right and suddenly
static libs will get less attractive.
--
Nicolas Mailhot