Le lundi 23 octobre 2006 à 22:04 +0200, Axel Thimm a écrit :
On Mon, Oct 23, 2006 at 09:05:33PM +0200, Nicolas Mailhot wrote:
> Le lundi 23 octobre 2006 à 14:44 -0400, Matthew Miller a écrit :
> > On Mon, Oct 23, 2006 at 08:08:36PM +0200, Nicolas Mailhot wrote:
>
> > Although it's perfectly reasonable for
> > Fedora to provide a default, it shouldn't/can't rely on me or you
keeping
> > that default, because, as Axel points out, there's many perfectly good
ways
> > for arranging this directory depending on system usage.
>
> As long as Fedora can provide a default and rely on the sysadmin
> creating directories, updating conf files, selinux contexts, if he
> wishes another policy all is fine
How, if the distribution defaults are in the way?
Just put distributions defaults under /srv/whatever if you're afraid of
collisions. With whatever being system if you're reasonable and
DoctObnik! or wi.drigco if you're not
--
Nicolas Mailhot