On Tue, Jul 25, 2006 at 06:29:28PM +0200, Ralf Corsepius wrote:
> But the scheme above even takes care of your multiuser-
> build-the-same-package-corner-case, so at least you have no reason not
> to be happy.
== no substantial progress on features in comparison to the current FE
recommendation.
Apples are not more yellow than oranges.
redhat-rpm-config patch: always ensures sane coherent buildroots, no
matter what the specfile
guideline: a disputable, non-mandatory recommendation
> > - Do %name, %version, %release always expand correctly (Rpm
suffers from
> > a bug, where at least %name or %version (I don't recall exactly)
> > occasionally is not being expanded correctly)?
>
> URL?
Sorry, none.
[...]
Unfortunately I don't have an example at hand to reproduce it.
Let's file it under hear-say then and move on.
--
Axel.Thimm at
ATrpms.net