On 1 June 2010 19:00, Jeff Spaleta <jspaleta(a)gmail.com> wrote:
2010/6/1 salsaman <salsaman(a)gmail.com>:
> I'd not heard of rpmfusion before, but if it's acceptible to Harry then I
> suggest we target builds for that instead of for for fedora itself.
If you are targeting rpmfusion, then the gst workaround I was trying
to suggest becomes less important as rpmfusion's LIVES can depend on
mplayer as packaged by rpmfusion even for theora.
That's fine with me.
--
Harry Rickards - harry(a)linux.com
Vote Lib Dem - Building a fairer Britain -
http://libdems.org.uk