>>>> "SS" == Simo Sorce <simo(a)redhat.com>
writes:
SS> I haven't found any Fedora Packaging rules or otherwise any
SS> recommendation on transforming a PEP440 package version number to an
SS> RPM NVR.
Don't the existing versioning guidelines already cover this, though? I
don't see how they fail to do so.
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Versioning#Non-Numeric_Version_i...
Isn't that pretty much what you describe? (Except that in the very last
case should be name-0.2.0-2.post1 because the release integer must
always increment.)
- J<