On Tue, 2007-01-16 at 16:05 -0500, Jesse Keating wrote:
On Tuesday 16 January 2007 16:00, Tom 'spot' Callaway wrote:
> No, actually, RHEL doesn't support v3 -> v5 upgrades afaik. At least,
> RHEL has never previously supported upgrades across more than one major
> release.
Hrm, I'm getting conflicting information from those over the wall.
However even still, RHEL4 -> RHEL5 is a pretty big jump, that's FC3~ -> FC6 to
think about. I just think we could widen our horizon a bit on how long to
keep a (valid) conflict in the spec file.
I don't think it would be a problem if the packager rationalized it
with:
# Needed for RHEL 4 -> RHEL 5 upgrade
~spot