On Mon, Jul 14, 2008 at 12:50 PM, Richard W.M. Jones <rjones(a)redhat.com> wrote:
But that was stuff where there either wasn't source or there was
no
clear chain from the source to the binary.
Please be clear that the MinGW cross-compiler is 100% free software
built from source. If it turns out that any parts aren't, then they
will be removed.
Sorry, I didn't mean to confuse the issue. I think Toshio is saying
better what I am trying to say.
There is a difference between cross-compiling code that is inherently
arch-adependent in how its compiled and writing code in a language
that is meant to be managed by a arch-independent virtual machine
layer.
I have a very difficult time seeing wine as similar to any virtual
machine based language such as mono unless wine can be built and run
on multiple arches. So as such I would have a very hard time seeing
any code be branded as Fedora that had to be run under wine to be
useful at all. I'm okay with optionally building a varient that runs
under wine as part of the Fedora project if and only if there is a
native version of that code already available for Fedora Linux. if
wine as a project gets to the point where it can usefully run on ppc,
then i would feel a lot better letting application code inside Fedora
need it. But I'd still want to have it as a side-repo.
-jef