Dne 16. 02. 24 v 1:21 Toshio Kuratomi napsal(a):
On Thu, Feb 15, 2024 at 2:06 PM Tim Flink tflink@fedoraproject.org wrote:
Does anyone have knowledge on how situations like this have been handled in the past?
I know in the past at least some packagers have submitted requests to upstream to include the additional license texts but I don't know if that was a general policy.
This IMHO is the right answer and there is also this guideline part of review guidelines [1]:
~~~
SHOULD: If the source package does not include license text(s) as a separate file from upstream, the packager SHOULD query upstream to include it.
~~~
IOW I believe that license tag should be always the source of truth and the rest needs to be clarified with upstream, but it is not blocker.
Vít
[1]: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/packaging-guidelines/ReviewGuidelines/#...