On 7/12/06, Jesse Keating <jkeating(a)redhat.com> wrote:
On Wednesday 12 July 2006 06:14, Michael Schwendt wrote:
> Else it would be abuse of tags. The only vaguely valid case is combining
> BuildArch noarch and ExcludeArch, which is like saying "by nature, the
> package contents are arch-independent, but we know that there is a problem
> on the N excluded archs".
How far do you take this though?
ExcludeArch: ppc ppc64 s390 s390x alpha sparc sparc64 ia64 arm .....
If you have over 3 excluded architectures, you are arch specific.
It is an arbitrary rule.. but sounds good to me.
--
Stephen J Smoogen.
CSIRT/Linux System Administrator