On Tuesday, 26 February 2008 at 23:09, Ralf Corsepius wrote:
On Tue, 2008-02-26 at 13:54 -0500, seth vidal wrote:
> On Tue, 2008-02-26 at 13:49 -0500, Bill Nottingham wrote:
> > Bill Nottingham (notting(a)redhat.com) said:
> > > The biggest issue I could see is that any issues in handling such a
package
> > > would need to be fixed *everywhere* that package is deployed, whether it
> > > be current Fedora, earlier Fedora, or EPEL. It may not be practical to
> > > deploy such fixes everywhere.
To me, these are the least issues. They are of a technical nature and
can be overcome/fixed (utf-8)
My concern is usability of the distro.
IMO, we can not avoid to restrict certain aspects of the distro to the
least common denominator. Package-names are such a case.
> > Consider, for example, that such a package breaks bugzilla. Although I
> > suppose that's one way to avoid getting bug reports.
> >
>
> /me renames yum to ᶨᶬⱴ
Is this Farsi, Arab or Hebrew?
Proposal: Let's rename the bodhi and koji packages + their primary
executables into their Indian rsp. Japanese equivalents :)
I, for one, have nothing against 工事. At least I wouldn't have to cringe
at the bad romanization that's used all over the place. :P
As for executables, you can always do something like
# ln -s 工事 /usr/bin/koji
and ship both... just kidding.
Although this discussion sheds an entirely new light on l10n/i18n. Imagine
a fully localised system, where not only messages, but also everything else
is translated into local language.
/me imagines typing (pl_PL.UTF-8 locale)
$ znajdź . -typ p -upr 0600 -drukuj
Oh, the horror. ;)
Regards,
R.
--
Fedora contributor
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/DominikMierzejewski
Livna contributor
http://rpm.livna.org MPlayer developer
http://mplayerhq.hu
"Faith manages."
-- Delenn to Lennier in Babylon 5:"Confessions and Lamentations"