On Mon, 2006-07-24 at 13:37 +0200, Axel Thimm wrote:
On Mon, Jul 24, 2006 at 06:32:47AM -0500, Rex Dieter wrote:
> While we're on the subject, what's the importance that the license file
> under %_docdir anyway? As far as I'm concerned, as long as the license
> is in the package somewhere, that's should be sufficient.
Easier mass-review by legal? It's easier to check there than rpm
-ql'ing the package and browsing though all file lists.
A real legal review
would have to look into each and every file in any
case. No matter which kind of "detached license files" a package's
tarball is accompanied by, or an FE rpm-packager might have added.
Ralf