On Tue, Feb 28, 2012 at 10:27 AM, Rex Dieter <rdieter(a)math.unl.edu> wrote:
On 02/28/2012 10:13 AM, Vít Ondruch wrote:
> Dne 28.2.2012 16:59, Rex Dieter napsal(a):
>> On 02/28/2012 09:29 AM, Vít Ondruch wrote:
>>> Pleas do not be mistaken. We are not speaking about building gems from
>> OK, so... is there some other better way to do it then? Please do
>> suggest any better alternative if you do.
> Better way is not doing it.
I guess we may have to agree to disagree then. Guidelines that allow for
not building from (preferred form) source is deal-breaker for me at least.
Agreed. We have to rebuild Java jars, or not include them, no matter
how uncomfortable COUGH*gallery2*COUGH. I don't see why another
language should be any different.
packaging mailing list
in your fear, seek only peace
in your fear, seek only love