On Wed, 2007-01-31 at 10:26 -0800, Toshio Kuratomi wrote:
I think I've realized where I'm getting confused, though.
packages will always fall under this policy. However this policy only
allows use of the "jpp" portion of the JPackage release tag until the
technical considerations are worked out. At that point the policy will
use the integer subrelease from JPackage without jpp.
If this is true then I'm still +1.
Yes. This is the case.
I dislike using the word Exception in something that's meant to
permanent because exceptions are things you want to get rid of. Since
this is something that we're seeing a continuous value in maybe
"JPackage Subrelease Policy" would be better. Use of the subrelease by
itself is generic enough that we might even consider extending it to
cover other situations if there's a legitimate need for it in the
Agreed. I'll rename it accordingly when it gets out of Draft.