On Thu, Jan 18, 2007 at 01:52:52AM +0100, Enrico Scholz wrote:
Axel.Thimm(a)ATrpms.net (Axel Thimm) writes:
> So let me ask again: What's really that bad about including the
> current *.la files into devel by default (unless really needed in
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
> main packages)
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Again: it depends on the (more or less) legitimated module whether .la
files (of listed dependency_libs) are required at runtime. Therefore,
.la files MUST be in main (when they are packaged at all).
Enrico
--
Axel.Thimm at
ATrpms.net