On Tue, 2006-07-04 at 11:37 +0100, Joe Orton wrote:
On Mon, Jul 03, 2006 at 08:54:14AM -0500, Jason L Tibbitts III
> >>>>> "TJ" == Tim Jackson <lists(a)timj.co.uk> writes:
> TJ> Not sure if I'm on my own here, but this seems like a lot of
> TJ> namespace clutter for little benefit. What's the problem with
> TJ> "yum install php-pear-FOO"?
> I believe spot's reasoning was that we don't want
> users to have to know whether what they want is in a PEAR or PECL
> module. I'm not sure it's worth the inevitable namespace collision.
I completely agree with Tim. You *have* to know whether the package is
a PEAR or PECL extension to be able to use it; we should not attempt to
hide this distinction from anybody, it will only lead to confusion and
Consider that provision dropped, I was never overly attached to it
Tom "spot" Callaway: Red Hat Technical Team Lead || GPG ID: 93054260
Fedora Extras Steering Committee Member (RPM Standards and Practices)
Aurora Linux Project Leader: http://auroralinux.org
Lemurs, llamas, and sparcs, oh my!