On Tue, 2007-02-06 at 21:54 +0100, Axel Thimm wrote:
On Tue, Feb 06, 2007 at 01:35:51PM -0600, Tom 'spot' Callaway
> Well, I'm trying to review the core perl package, and part of that has
> been a near total spec rewrite. I need to know whether I should add a
> perl-devel or not.
If there is a mass rebuild (e.g. by Matt's buildsystem) before test2
it could be used to check whether that split really harms
anything. But I think perhaps that's us being to pedantic in this
case, and we could revisit it after F7.
OK, being pedantic:
- I can't make perl pass review unless I make a perl-devel
- Perl needs an exception in the guidelines so it can pass review.
Which one would people prefer for FC-7? At this point, I'm rather