On Mon, Dec 16, 2019 at 1:18 PM Neal Gompa <ngompa13(a)gmail.com> wrote:
On Mon, Dec 16, 2019 at 1:00 PM Miro Hrončok <mhroncok(a)redhat.com> wrote:
>
> On 16. 12. 19 16:56, Neal Gompa wrote:
> > For what it's worth. I think %pycached is a nice improvement. I'm not
> > sure if I like the name of it specifically, but the behavior is quite
> > desirable.
>
> Naming things ¯\_(ツ)_/¯
>
> I was thinking:
>
> %with_pycache - collides with bconds
> %include_pycache - quite long
> %pyc - quite indecipherable
> %pycache - might be mistaken to only include the pyc files
>
> %pycached doesn't sound that bad to me - include that file, but also its cached
> Python bytecode. However I am not a native speaker and I realize I often
> desecrate the English language. Got any better suggestions?
>
%pyfile is probably quite enough for that. It looks and feels like a
marker instead of something strange, and the underlying behavior is
somewhat immaterial.
I support this incremental improvement.
I agree with Neal here. %pyfile is probably the best/simplest option.
It will read best too, as it basically says "Deploy the functionality
of this python file in the appropriate manner". The implementation can
then be adjusted as needed.