On Wed, Oct 18, 2006 at 05:08:23PM +0200, Ralf Corsepius wrote:
I consider the separation of firmware from "other binaries"
inside of
the FPG to be nonsensical and the criteria above to be nonsensical, and
wish we (FPC) were able to find better criteria.
I think the package group's mandate is about *how* to package, not
*what* to package and whether it's legal, endagers Fedora sponsors, is
in the spirit of Fedora etc.
E.g. these goals are set from a higher instance and we just provide
matching guidelines. IMO we shouldn't redefine objectives, this needs
to be escalated to <your board here>. Especially if something isn't
spelled out in the current objectives as clear as the
position/distinction towards firmwares and other non-source binaries.
--
Axel.Thimm at
ATrpms.net