On Wed, Oct 18, 2006 at 05:08:23PM +0200, Ralf Corsepius wrote:
I consider the separation of firmware from "other binaries"
the FPG to be nonsensical and the criteria above to be nonsensical, and
wish we (FPC) were able to find better criteria.
I think the package group's mandate is about *how* to package, not
*what* to package and whether it's legal, endagers Fedora sponsors, is
in the spirit of Fedora etc.
E.g. these goals are set from a higher instance and we just provide
matching guidelines. IMO we shouldn't redefine objectives, this needs
to be escalated to <your board here>. Especially if something isn't
spelled out in the current objectives as clear as the
position/distinction towards firmwares and other non-source binaries.
Axel.Thimm at ATrpms.net