On Tue, 2006-11-14 at 19:32 +0100, Michael Schwendt wrote:
On Tue, 14 Nov 2006 19:01:01 +0100, Nicolas Mailhot wrote:
> Le mardi 14 novembre 2006 à 12:52 +0100, Michael Schwendt a écrit :
> > On Tue, 14 Nov 2006 12:35:26 +0100, Thorsten Leemhuis wrote:
>
> > > Well, Core has conflicts with other core packages afaik. So the above
> > > will never work afaics, with or without Extras.
> >
> > Is that true?
>
> The kernel package, for example, has a boatload of versionned conflicts
> to prevent installation on a system with the wrong userspace level.
Void.
The right userspace tools are part of Core, so these conditional conflicts
only become active under corner-case conditions and then create artificial
hurdles.
== bug
Frankly speaking, I am having difficulties to imagine valid reasons when
an explicit "Conflicts:" in an rpm.spec makes any sense, and am inclined
to think all such explicit "Conflicts:" actually are packaging bugs.
Am I missing something?
Ralf