On 01/30/2012 01:31 PM, Christoph Wickert wrote:
Am Sonntag, den 29.01.2012, 23:38 -0500 schrieb Jon Stanley:
> On Sun, Jan 29, 2012 at 8:04 PM, Christoph Wickert
> <christoph.wickert(a)googlemail.com> wrote:
>> I wonder if this rule is still needed. I know I'd loose backward
>> compatibility with older rpm versions, but I don't want make a
> I agree that a -common subpackage is silly for this, but are any of
> the RPM versions that this *wouldn't* work with still in supported
Not in Fedora.
> The only one I'd be concerned with is RHEL5, but I think even that
> works right, no?
I haven't tested it, but based on my experience with multi-arch file
conflicts I *guess* it will not work on RHEL 5.
But RHEL 5 shouldn't really get gtk3 packages anyway, right?
Michel Alexandre Salim
Fedora Project Contributor: http://fedoraproject.org/
Email: salimma(a)fedoraproject.org | GPG key ID: A36A937A
Jabber: hircus(a)jabber.ccc.de | IRC: hircus(a)irc.freenode.net
() ascii ribbon campaign - against html e-mail
- against proprietary attachments