>>>> "JLT" == Jason L Tibbitts
<tibbs(a)math.uh.edu> writes:
JLT> I don't think that we should allow any implicit package
JLT> Do we need to note under "Optional Functionality" that the
JLT> Conflicts: should go away when the package being conflicted with
JLT> is in the repository and the oldest possible version in a
JLT> particular distro release is new enough not to conflict? This
JLT> would get rid of many of the conflicts that glibc has.
Umm, you know, it helps to hit reload so you're actually reading the
correct version.
- J<