On Mon, 23 Mar 2009, Rex Dieter wrote:
Mattias Ellert wrote:
> It was suggested to me to bring this issue to this list.
> The packaging guidelines says that a package should not own a directory
> that is owned by a package on which it depends.
> The packaging guidelines also says that packages should own all
> directories needed in order not to leave orphaned directories after a
> package de-installation.
> The way rpm/yum currently works these guidelines are contradicting and
> you must choose which one to implement in your packaging.
> My question is - is this a bug in yum/rpm, or a flaw in the packaging
What bug number is this?