Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: libFoundation - A free implementation of OpenStep's
------- Additional Comments From rc040203(a)freenet.de 2006-09-28 22:26 EST -------
(In reply to comment #12)
I'm not sure what impact this would have on other dependent
projects, and it's
for fixing something that (currently) isn't broke. I also consulted the
packaging commitee and most agree on that (but we were only 5 out of 10
Sorry, due to an unplanned commitment, I could not make it yesterday.
If I had been around, I would have voted against "allowing
I suggest the following: Let the package pass as is (at least wrt to
the are other issues, they need to be fixed, of course), and I will take the
header topic upstream. So should a clash with say glibc's assumed future
extensions folder come up, the issue would have been ironed out at the source
and not the package. Do you agree?
I don't fully understand what you are trying to say, but the answer probable is
IMO, THIS package is misbehaving and therefore MUST be fixed. If other packages
contain hard-coded dependencies on this misbehavior, all necessary changes MUST
be reflected to them, too.
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.