--- Comment #5 from Christopher Meng <cickumqt(a)gmail.com> ---
(In reply to Michael Scherer from comment #4)
1) I fail to understand what you mean by "doesn't pass first
itself", can you clarify ?
I review packages first from SPEC, if spec is not fine, the review of course
will generate many problems. SPEC should be bascially correct.
I will post a updated with 0.0.2 shortly, didn't see there was a
since I posted it.
2) for %configure, likely a wrong cut and paste, will remove it in
3) I didn't report a bug, because this is not a bug.
%check is not usable because it requires the source code of gtest directly,
ie it likly use a non public API by using internals of gtest.cc. And so
asking to gtest to distribute the code as part of the rpm would likely make
others people use it ( so make it public while it likely shouldn't ), which
will them be a hack and quite fragile. I will not ask the package to carry a
non public API just for a test.
Yes, but you should mention this in the initial comment so that we won't waste
Nice to see you have time, so update the bug and I will review it formally.
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component